The Daily Record‘s latest poll with Survation has Holyrood numbers which, shall we say, may add to the anxiety in Labour that they still haven’t hit bottom yet. Presumably a new leader will hope for a bounce (although so too might Nicola once she’s formally in the big chair), and Labour will pass this off as a long way away and irrelevant. But it’s only 18 months away now, and the end of the referendum campaign has hardly brought them any relief. Change in vote share shown here is pretty notional – the last one of these I had was in July, and a lot has happened since then. For the sake of having some comparison, I’m using it anyway, and seats (as usual, using Scotland Votes, with its UKIP shortcoming) show the notional change on the 2011 result.
Parties | Constituency | Region | Total | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vote share (+/-) | Seats (+/-) | Vote share (+/-) | Seats (+/-) | Seats (+/-) | % | |
SNP | 50.0 (+5.9) | 68 (+15) | 40.6 (+3.7) | 2 (-14) | 70 (+1) | 54.3 |
Labour | 23.0 (-7.6) | 0 (-15) | 20.3 (-5.4) | 27 (+5) | 27 (-10) | 20.9 |
Conservative | 14.1 (+0.8) | 3 (±0) | 13.0 (0.1) | 13 (±0) | 16 (+1) | 12.4 |
Liberal Democrats | 6.7 (+1.6) | 2 (±0) | 6.4 (-0.9) | 4 (+1) | 6 (+1) | 4.7 |
Scottish Greens | 2.3 (+0.4) | 0 (±0) | 9.9 (+1.8) | 10 (+8) | 10 (+8) | 7.8 |
UKIP | 3.1 (-1.0) | 0 (±0) | 7.7 (-0.4) | 0 (±0) | 0 (±0) | 0 |
Others | 0.7 (+0.1) | 0 | 2.1 (+1.2) | 0 (-1) | 0 (-1) | 0 |
Bear in mind the ‘kippers would probably secure seven here – all from the list, and therefore most likely to be predominantly at Labour’s expense, maybe two or three seats from the three smaller parties. The Scotland Votes map shows a complete constituency wipeout for Labour – with, in what would be an extraordinary humiliation, Jim Murphy’s neck of the woods turning back to Tory blue. The Tories would also pick up Dumfriesshire from Labour, but lose Galloway and West Dumfries, as well as Ayr, to the SNP. The Lib Dems would hold the two Northern Isles seats only, plus one more on the list. And the bulk of Labour’s net loss would go to the Greens, who’d be in double figures overall for the first time.
And the main event, of course, would be a slightly increased overall majority for the SNP under Nicola. Hitting 50% in the first vote trumps even the 45.8% the SNP score in the Westminster poll done by Survation at the same time. 2011 was billed as a landslide, but landslides (to break the metaphor) normally recede. At Holyrood, it looks like the land is still sliding in the same direction. It would be an extraordinary achievement to say the least. For comparison, here’s what the constituency map looked like in 1999.
Another thing to note about this is would see another substantial round of churn in terms of the experience of MSPs in the Chamber. Labour would lose all 15 constituency MSPs, including some of the most experienced of those who survived the 2011 landslide, and gain five more newcomers, unless they take a more relaxed attitude to MSPs standing for both. The SNP would, conversely, lose a slew of list MSPs (it’s unclear where, from the model, the two list Members they would retain would be, but the North East plus one would seem a safe bet) and gain yet more constituency MSPs. If I were Humza Yousaf or any other SNP list MSP I’d be seeking a constituency to stand in with some urgency. Similarly, the Tories would lose two of their most experienced MSPs in John Scott and former Presiding Officer Alex Fergusson, even while inching up somewhat overall. And the Greens would have a group that (unless any former MSPs are selected sufficiently prominently), which could be 80% newcomers. A lot of change for no difference in the unbalance of power, in short.
#1 by James on November 18, 2014 - 11:32 am
Another option for the SNP list MSPs would be to try their luck for a Westminster seat next year.
#2 by David on November 18, 2014 - 2:45 pm
The % in the final column cannot be right (or at least i don’t understand what they refer to) – SNP at 46.5% when have an overall majority of seats ?
#3 by James on November 18, 2014 - 2:48 pm
Corrected!
#4 by Ian Baxter on November 18, 2014 - 5:59 pm
Not wishing to be pedantic… OK, wishing to be pedantic … why is there a Tory figure missing from the mock-up of the chamber? Is he or she moonlighting at their law practice?
#5 by James on November 18, 2014 - 6:51 pm
Aha! No idea. One for Scotland Votes.
#6 by Rob on November 18, 2014 - 6:45 pm
Ran it through a spreadsheet – the SNP’s two regional seats would both be in Highlands & Islands (their regional vote share is down slightly on 2011, so they would lose North East list seat). UKIP would have 8 seats it they were included – SNP 70, Lab 22, Con 14, Green 9, UKIP 8, Lib Dem 6.
#7 by Michael on November 18, 2014 - 8:10 pm
A much better use of every Yes voter’s Regional vote would be to vote Green: even with over 40% of the regional vote, the SNP would only gain two more seats because of the way the Additional Member System works.
If everyone voting SNP in this poll used their Regional vote to vote Green, the SNP wouldn’t get those two seats, but the Greens would get 40 seats from the regional vote, meaning a total of 108 pro-independence MSPs vs just 21 unionists. This contrasts with 80 vs 49 with the regional votes “wasted” on the SNP.
This plan would see the Greens taking 9 of the seats that would otherwise go to the Tories, 4 from the LibDems, 15 from Labour, and only the 2 from the SNP.
Go to http://www.scotlandvotes.com/holyrood and try it yourself!