It’s time for month four of our rolling sequence of polls, conducted as usual by Survation, in partnership with the Daily Record and Dundee University’s 5 Million Questions. The May figures are here, and the Record have written up the indyref results here. The headline there is 47% Yes, 53% No, which is the best score for Yes that we’ve recorded since this polling project began.
That same Record story has the answer to another question: it shows Scots voters would go 54/46 for independence if they were sure Cameron was going to win, which is interesting although a) no-one will know the May 2016 election result in advance and b) no matter how much one may hate Cameron, that’s a poor basis for a vote for independence.
Anyway, onto the Holyrood numbers. Usual background: I’m comparing vote shares to the previous month’s figures: but seat numbers are still shown as the change on the 2011 result. Seat projections are again from Scotland Votes, who don’t include UKIP in their methodology. The ‘kippers are again scoring at a level where they should expect to win a small number of regional list seats, but it is again unclear at which party’s expense those gains would come. Probably more from those parties who are strongest on the list, i.e. overwhelmingly Labour, then Greens and then the rest. If our pals at Weber Shandwick want to keep that tool accurate, regrettably they will need a UKIP entry in their table. With all that in mind, here are this month’s figures.
Parties | Constituency | Region | Total | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vote share (+/-) | Seats (+/-) | Vote share (+/-) | Seats (+/-) | Seats (+/-) | % | |
SNP | 46.2 (+2.5) | 60 (+7) | 39.3 (+0.2) | 5 (-11) | 65 (-4) | 50.4 |
Labour | 28.3 (-3.4) | 8 (-7) | 26.2 (-0.2) | 29 (+7) | 37 (±0) | 28.7 |
Conservative | 13 (-2.4) | 3 (±0) | 10.4 (-0.9) | 7 (-5) | 10 (-5) | 7.8 |
Liberal Democrats | 6.2 (+1.3) | 2 (±0) | 6.1 (±0) | 4 (+1) | 6 (+1) | 4.7 |
Scottish Greens | 2.5 (+1.5) | 0 (±0) | 10.0 (+1.3) | 11 (+9) | 11 (+9) | 8.5 |
UKIP | 3.2 (+1.1) | 0 (±0) | 7.0 (-0.1) | 0 (±0) | 0 (±0) | 0 |
Others | 0.5 (-0.7) | 0 | 1.0 (-0.3) | 0 (-1) | 0 (-1) | 0 |
This would be another very strong result for the SNP: to be within striking distance of 50% in the constituencies, with your nearest rivals almost 20% behind? Few governments seven years into office can have retained this level of support. 65 seats would be a peculiar number to win – technically the barest majority, but theoretically vulnerable: not a position from which coalition would ever make sense for a junior partner, functionally more like a super-minority administration (edit: and unlike now, without a former SNP MSP in the PO’s chair). If 47 generally felt comfortable between 2007 and 2011, this would be a doddle (again, remember they might be one short of this depending on the impact of the ‘kippers).
Labour’s result here looks like a flatline, but they’d actually regard it as a further falling back. Just eight constituencies would go their way: the lists would bring another group of more unknown quantities into Holyrood to swell the Labour delegation, and winning more than 50% of all the list seats would be likely (on these numbers) to make Labour the most vulnerable to any ‘kippers off the lists: the real figure could well be 35 or 36 if this result were the real figure for UKIP in 2016. Whatever John McTernan thinks, this would start to look like SNP hegemony to Labour activists. The demoralising effect would be hard to overstate.
Which brings us to the third-largest group in the Chamber on these numbers: the Greens. Sure, the Tories are a scant 0.4% ahead of the Greens on the list, but the unhelpful (for them) concentration of their vote in South wouldn’t help them in terms of seats, and the Greens show as one ahead of them. In fact, we’d see the Tory group drop by a third, with just four MSPs more than the Lib Dems, who appear to have hit a floor of around 6% for now. All these parties might lose one of these seats to UKIP, obviously. But even 9-10 Green MSPs would be an extraordinary breakthrough for the party.
Looking at all of this as a piece, this is my favourite Survation poll yet, even if the Holyrood election remains in the unpredictable zone beyond the independence vote. A win in #indyref vote, though, which is the next time Scots voters have their say, is now clearly in touching distance. With a strong ground game and some improved messaging, we could even see a moderately convincing win for Yes.
Pingback: Scotland's Date With DestinySCOTTISH GREENS WELCOME LATEST INDYREF AND HOLYROOD POLLS |
#1 by Will on June 12, 2014 - 7:04 pm
I’m getting 8 UKIP MEPs – one per region. The full tally I reach is SNP 63, Lab 33, Con 10, Green 10, UKIP 8, LD 5.
The big news on this poll is that Johann Lamont and Ruth Davidson would lose their seats: Glasgow Pollok would fall to the SNP and the Tories would drop to fifth place in Glasgow with just 4.15% of the vote.
The SNP would win back Dunfermline, and Iain Gray looks to be in trouble in East Lothian.
So when you factor in UKIP, that looks like curtains for the SNP’s majority, but the party has the good fortune of being able to pick its partners – it would take all the opposition working together to defeat the SNP: if just one party abstained on a motion, the SNP would win the vote. So the results of votes would be pretty predictable, but it’d be fascinating to see how they were reached!
#2 by rjbh on June 12, 2014 - 7:36 pm
maybe the punter who put 400 grand on NO to win feels a tad uneasy now,
#3 by charlesobrien08 on June 13, 2014 - 2:38 pm
I like good news,and I like the way its done,thanks I needed cheering up.
#4 by Willie Fleming on June 13, 2014 - 2:55 pm
There was no punter who put 400 grand on NO to win, that was just a stupid story by a reporter who knows nothing about how bookies shops work. Predictably all our “journalists” jumped on it as another anti-YES story to spread.
#5 by bjsalba on June 13, 2014 - 5:48 pm
You say that hatred of Cameron is a poor basis for a vote for independence. Why are you personalizing this? I think it is Tory policies that are hated not the man, although I hold him in utter contempt for the false promises he made at the election.
The problem with the Westminster Parliament is that based on the performance of the last Labour Government, they are not a viable alternative, so what else is left?
If the Scottish electorate is displeased with what Westminster does, Independence would at least give an opportunity for our voice to be heard.
#6 by James on June 13, 2014 - 6:50 pm
The question I was referring to was specific to Cameron. I intend to vote Yes primarily because Westminster is (irrespective of party) barely democratic.