I’m leaving Sweden, again. It feels good to be heading back to my flat in Leith, to Stereo in Glasgow and all my friends, to the Cairngorms, to Frightened Rabbit and Easter Road, CalMac ferries and Scotrail sprinter trains. I would also have put Innis and Gunn Rum Cask on the list, but the Swedish alcohol monopoly sees fit to stock the stuff to an admirable degree.
I’ve been away for a half-year now, watching the independence referendum from afar. I’ve seen TV clips of Johann Lamont declare Scotland a something-for-nothing society before finishing my breakfast and going to work with better paid colleagues at publicly funded Swedish universities. I’ve been forced to turn down Facebook invites to a succession of Nordic Horizons events at the Scottish Parliament, but then had the pleasure of seeing the ideas they promote in action every day.
I’ve heard the Better Together campaign say that modern Scotland is as good as it gets, then walked out of my front door to see a version of urban life which is in many ways better.
I’ve had the pleasure of seeing a Green party take its place as the third party in parliament and take on both left and right on the environment, on child poverty and on the terrible state of privatized railways. Every day on my way to the metro station I pass three different council-run nursery schools and men with pushchairs taking their paternity leave whilst their partners return to work.
I’ve been able to live cheaply in cooperatively run housing with district heating and communal facilities, so well insulated that I often don’t even need to have the radiator on.
I’ve met young Green activists who, unlike young people in Scotland and the rest of Britain, seem to have a genuine belief in their ability to change their country for the better. I’ve hung out with girls from a design school who one day decided that all of the products they made should have zero environmental impact and then set about making it happen.
I’ve talked to writers and journalists who are all part of a vibrant cultural arena, and seen what proper funding can do for political diversity (all Swedish parliamentary parties are given money to stimulate debate and encourage youth politics, as well as to maintain a small staff).
I will be sad to leave Sweden, though it is not a country without its own problems (not least a worrying consumerism which accompanies being one of the world’s richest countries), but I come back over the North Sea with a sincere belief that a Scandinavian style approach in Scotland is not just desirable, but both possible and necessary. Britain today is not as good as it gets.
#1 by Aidan on January 27, 2013 - 1:37 pm
err, Johann Lamont didn’t declare Scotland a something for nothing culture, she said we weren’t.
Better Together doesn’t claim Scotland is the best of all possible worlds currently – just that independence wouldn’t improve things.
Parliamentary parties are also publicaly funded staff and get money for policy development etc funded
#2 by Dom on January 27, 2013 - 4:46 pm
I meant that JL was working on a false premise, in that countries with universal welfare are not ‘something for nothing’, because everyone pays in. I actually think that the SNP should be more honest about the sort of income tax required to develop such a cohesive and open society.
My opposition to BT together stems more from a lack of imagination on their part than anything else, and that their apparent idea of small countries with developed welfare and high levels of public investment is not a serious proposition.
As for parliamentary funding, the Swedish system is far better managed and includes salaried positions for youth convenors, materials and public engagement (meaning the parties can’t just spend it on what they like). It is designed to stop smaller parties being left behind and means that they are not as exposed to corruption as otherwise might be the case. As Scottish Labour are finding out, struggling to stay afloat detracts from the business of running a political project.
#3 by Martin B on January 27, 2013 - 1:40 pm
Anyone who’s had any kind of close scrutiny of Sweden[1] can’t help but come to the conclusion that it’s a fantastic model for what Scotland *could* be. I wrote something on the same subject a wee while back:
http://www.easyweb.co.uk/2012/12/the-kind-of-country-i-want-to-live-in/
[1] Lesley Riddoch has done the same with all the other Nordics; I’m interested to see her views on .se
#4 by Martin B on January 27, 2013 - 2:04 pm
One could also simply compare the UNESCO stats on Child Welfare in OECD countries. Sweden: 2nd. UK: bottom (21st/21)
#5 by Martin B on January 28, 2013 - 1:39 am
And when I said UNESCO, I obviously meant UNICEF.
http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/rc7_eng.pdf
Note also the followup work which specifically compared child experience between UK & Sweden (and Spain)
http://www.unicef.org.uk/Documents/Publications/UNICEFIpsosMori_childwellbeing_reportsummary.pdf
and cited inequality and a materialistic culture as being primary causes of the UK’s low position. And that was *before* the 2010 election…
#6 by Stephen B on January 28, 2013 - 9:01 am
Sweden is one of the fascinating countries that people read into it confirmation of their political philosophies while ignoring the rest.
For example, from a right wing perspective, I quite like the thought of their low corporation taxes, higher VAT, school voucher systems, no minimum wage, budgets surplaces, pensions reform, flexible labour markets, control over their own currency etc.
Interesting anecdotal post here: http://thebillfold.com/2012/12/why-the-swedes-move-to-norway-and-why-i-tagged-along/