Democracy doesn’t run itself. There’s a reason why political donations, like charitable giving, are tax deductible. The public has a vested interest in political parties being well populated and well funded. The more average Joe’s that sign up with direct debits, the less the Souters’ will be required to play a part.
So I’ve never understood how so many people can be fleetingly interested in politics once every four years while still resentful that those very few that are constantly, consistently involved don’t just fix everything for them, the way they want. My preferred vision of an ideal country is for political parties to be chock full of engaged individuals, branch meetings to be lively affairs and candidate selections to be thorough and exciting. We are, sadly, a long way off and we shouldn’t need George Galloway to remind us of this.
I took the principle down to London of choosing a party from the local options and joining it although, in the same way that I don’t really believe I’m a Londoner, I never really felt a proper member of GPEW, even one at the outer fringes (which is all I ever was, and all I ever intend to be, irrespective of the party I’m a member of). So, now that a return to Scotland is looming, if not quite imminent, sticking to that principle but jumping ship seemed like a good idea, and there was really only one option.
The SNP is taking the debate, constitutional and otherwise, wider and deeper than any other party. While I rail against the idea that a Scot can’t be ambivalent about independence, so regularly touted by the more fundamentalist Nationalists out there, there is no avoiding the intertwining of the SNP and independence, irrespective of the fact that independence alone will neither improve nor worsen the lives of any Scot. Politically I may be pale green but the Scottish Green Party is only advancing the independence debate on its backfoot, and that lacks a certain appeal, despite being justifiable, as we enter an historic period that needs to be grasped with all fingers and all toes, whichever side of the argument one is on.
In terms of political debate, independence is the only show in town, and Scotland shouldn’t be ashamed of that.
And, well, it might be the paltry departures boards at Scottish airports, it might be voting for 1 Tory MP but still being stuck with a Tory Chancellor, it might be the growing desire to hear a distinctly Scottish voice on a global stage, it might be the creeping belief that Scotland would be a fairer place if it left parts of the UK behind, it might be a selfish desire surrounding who would more usefully spend Scotland’s considerable energy revenues or it might simply be the unsustainable tug-of-war of a coalition Government taking the UK one way and a Scottish Government taking Scotland another, but it’ll most likely be a Yes vote in 2014 from me.
To be the best you’ve got to beat the best, and I don’t see the UK taking on Finland in education, France in egalitarianism and Sweden in Social Democracy any time soon. Scotland could, given the chance.
How can you get excited about a Russian doll that sits inside another Russian doll? The same way that you can’t get excited about a country that sits inside another country. You can’t see something if you don’t know it’s there and you don’t know something’s there if you can’t see it. It’s time Scotland stepped out of the shadows.
And joining the party that is doing its utmost to make that Yes victory a reality seems appropriate if I am to make good on my personal principle of being a member of a party and assisting in the (very) low level funding of politics that greases the wheels of democracy.
This is not to say that I ever want to be a Convener of this or a Councillor of there, the sooner Scotland moves away from the notion that to be a member of a political party means holding some wonkish desire to hold some sort of office the better. And anyway, another reason the SNP is an appealing party to join at the very fringes is because it is abundantly clear that the party is fizzing with healthy energy, positive ideas and young, fresh talent ready to shore up any MP, MSP, MEP or councillor gaps that may arise, as I suspect we shall no doubt see in May.
It’s worth noting that running a blog and being the member of a political party, particularly the SNP, is an occupational hazard to be risked at one’s peril. It’s no accident that I cancelled my first bout of SNP membership in less than glorious circumstances, but I don’t intend to make the same mistake twice. I maintain that there’s no good reason why an ordinary person can’t write about politics as a hobby without fear of being a fish in a barrel that will inevitably be shot at. (It does help that a particular bane of my own blogging life recently ran into pleasingly emasculating professional difficulties, even if indulging in such schadenfreude probably makes me a slightly lesser person).
Not that the SNP is perfect of course. There are good reasons beyond Malcolm Chisholm MSP why the area I will be moving to is the only constituency in Scotland not represented by the SNP at Holyrood. Complacency is surely not an option for a party a couple of years out from the biggest date in its history. All negative associations, from Rupert Murdoch down to Joan McAlpine, should be objectively considered. Not that one should join a party only to take pot shots at it.
Many Scots have joined the SNP in 2012. The party, and by extension Scotland itself, has a seductive momentum and is clearly going places. In the spirit of being the change that one wants to see in the world, from greater public participation in political parties through to Scotland having a voice on the world stage, it is very pleasing indeed to be back onboard.
#1 by Steve on April 2, 2012 - 11:39 am
I presume you mean only constituency in Lothian (or maybe Edinburgh), not Scotland?
To be fair to the Greens, they are a democratic party and I don’t think their membership is all that pro independence, so rather than trying to run roughshod over their membership (e.g. Labour – many of its members are in favour of devo max or independence) they are trying to find a way to be relevant to the debate and true to their membership.
#2 by Jeff on April 2, 2012 - 11:51 am
I mean all of Scotland. I think I’m right that Edinburgh North & Leith is the only area that has constituents that don’t have an SNP MSP (regional or constituency).
#3 by Steve on April 2, 2012 - 12:08 pm
Wow, you’re right! I live in that area and didn’t even realise. How odd.
#4 by Robert Blake on April 2, 2012 - 12:16 pm
Jeff
I believe that, even though you joined the separatists, you will do your bit to keep them honest and cast a light where it needs casting, pull them up where they fall short.
I just wish that others for other parties would do the same
#5 by Jeff on April 2, 2012 - 12:31 pm
Thanks, I think.
“Separatists” isn’t a term that I would ever choose to use, needlessly emotive as it is, though admittedly technically accurate.
But you’re right that most parties line up far too often and far too obediently along party lines when it is the debate and the disagreement, inside and out of parties, that the fun of political involvement lies.
The SNP tend to do a great job online of picking holes in party positions though – Burdzeyeview and Lalland’s Peat Worrier have had several recent excellent posts in this regard, making up for the somewhat slavish adherence to Salmond’s decisions in the Parliament itself, one could argue.
#6 by Robert Blake on April 2, 2012 - 2:07 pm
James
Apologies. Independentistas then.
The bugbear for me is Labourhame, which I find a perversions of the tolerance, inclusivity and principle we should have. It seems less a Labour site, than one individual’s wee clique
Labourlist is mildly better, it has to be said
Liberal conspiracy is more my cup of tea
Anyway, good luck to you
#7 by Jeff on April 2, 2012 - 2:19 pm
Independentistas! I like it! Sounds kind of South American, and I’ve always wanted a tan.
I’ve not read Labour Hame in a long time (which perhaps vindicates your viewpoint that it’s a wasted opportunity?) so I can’t really comment. it doesn’t sound like the site is taking off as it should have done though.
PS It’s Jeff here, not James. I edited the first error but thought I’d point out the second…
#8 by Robert Blake on April 2, 2012 - 2:48 pm
Ooops!
There’s me sportin a pure beemer so ah am!
Sorry, Jeff you are, and you remain!
Well, there’s my credibility shot
#9 by Stuart on April 2, 2012 - 12:18 pm
The Scottish Greens will be getting much more involved in the independence debate in the coming 18 months- there’s still a long way to go before 2014.
Watch this space.
#10 by Jeff on April 2, 2012 - 12:33 pm
Glad to hear it. There is still a long, long way till the vote itself so I’m probably being a bit unfair in gently chastising them for being on the “backfoot”.
#11 by Doug Daniel on April 2, 2012 - 12:24 pm
Excellent news Jeff – although I knew you’d be back. They always come back…
I’m the same as you – I’m a member, but I hold no desire to become an elected representative or part of the administration. Mainly through laziness/inconvenience (door-chapping always seems to start at 5:30pm, so even if I DID fancy skipping my supper and the gym to go traipsing the streets after a full day at work, I would still be on my way home at that time), but also because I’m not sure I trust myself not to dismiss someone rather pithily if they give me the same rubbish about subsidies or border patrols that I’ve heard from other people that day. It’s one thing to do it on a politics blog, but it’s quite another to do it to someone at their doorstep, someone who may not even take much interest in politics. So it would be a bit cheeky of me to expect to rise up the party ranks if I’m not willing to start at the bottom!
As for getting into trouble by blogging, I’d like to think those who caused all that nonsense at the time have gotten used to the fact that people with party memberships are not actually spokespersons for their parties, regardless of how regularly unionists protest that the SNP should somehow by in charge of what each and every one of its members (sorry, Cybernats) is saying online. I’m fairly sure that was just one in the (very) long line of stushies in Scottish politics which, in hindsight, were absolutely pathetic.
#12 by Jeff on April 2, 2012 - 5:18 pm
Thanks Doug.
I’m with you on the leafletting, but that harks back to my suggestion that it should be acceptable for people to join parties while still being free to be as involved as they want to be. Competing priorities mean that it’ll be a very rare day indeed that’ll see me leafletting (not that I’ll be back in Scotland before the May elections).
Funnily enough, I don’t think biting my tongue for any doorstepping would be the issue. I think the issue, applicable to all parties as far as I know, is that there’s a set list of questions that get asked that makes the canvasser sound like a robot rather than a real person. I suppose the output from canvassing needs to be usable so in a set format but reading out questionnaires to confused people doesn’t sound like fun (and wasn’t fun the couple of times I did before).
I’d like to see a movement towards local meetings, local debates where a high profile member or candidate or MP/MSP/councillor discuss the local issues. Not just at election time but throughout any term. It would be more enjoyable to be a party member at such times, less slogging around doors and it would help draw more of the public into the whole process.
But yeah, leafletting? Not for me thanks. And I don’t even have gym visits to use as an excuse!
#13 by Indy on April 2, 2012 - 9:15 pm
You don’t read out a questionnaire on the doorstep- or at least you shouldn’t.
There are a set of questions you want the answer to but they should be woven into a natural conversation.
Practice makes perfect!
#14 by Indy on April 2, 2012 - 1:13 pm
Welcome back. I think it’s good to have independently minded people in the party – elected members have to toe the line to a certain extent in terms of policy etc but no reason anyone else has to! I don’t think the whole blogging thing is a real issue because although you have sometimes said stuff I don’t agree with you have never said anything horrible or nasty or basically untrue.
#15 by Jeff on April 2, 2012 - 1:24 pm
Thanks Indy, and I agree. Some bloggers try to overstate the importance of blogging. I’m not one of them.
#16 by Craig on April 2, 2012 - 1:55 pm
I joined the SNP in the Autumn and I have been delivering council electional material for a few weeks now. I’ve never been involved in any political party before but independence is too important to not get involved and I find the process quite interesting. I’ve no desire to be a representative but it’s good to meet local people and hear what they say, I quite enjoy the blether! That said I haven’t been canvassing so have not confronted non-SNP voters and I’m interested to see how that goes. Lots of tongue-bting I suspect.
#17 by Doug Daniel on April 2, 2012 - 4:18 pm
Word of advice – biting people’s tongues most definitely won’t win them over to our way of thinking.
*tumbleweed*
#18 by Dubbieside on April 2, 2012 - 4:25 pm
Jeff
Your input has been missed, welcome back.
I think that the Greens will be important during the run up to the referendum debate, given that theirs will be a none SNP voice, and they can make a real contribution, particularly about Trident.
Craig
Canvassing is not so much fun these days as the opposition are so dispirited. I canvas round the old mining areas and it has been a long time since I have been told where to stick my leaflets. Now you are more likely to be told “I did not leave Labour son, they left me” the Lib Dems are wearing sackcloth and ashes, Torys are non existent.
#19 by Richard on April 2, 2012 - 4:39 pm
Welcome back to the fold, Jeff. My memory is just long enough to appreciate the reference in the title 🙂
#20 by Lin Anderson on April 2, 2012 - 6:00 pm
I support Scottish Independence, but have only recently joined the SNP. I agree with Jeff and have read his blog for some time. What does Scotland want to be as a country? One thing is for certain. It is not what the coalition desire for the UK. The SNP are leading us to self-determination, but those resident in Scotland will decide our path after we get there. I support the mix of parties in the Scottish parliament. Long may it continue. All voices should be heard. Maybe after the referendum those parties will feel free to have views that don’t have to reflect those of their London masters.
#21 by Topher Dawson on April 2, 2012 - 6:27 pm
Welcome back Jeff, I’m glad the stushie was not terminal. I always enjoy reading your posts, they are reasonable and reasoned. By the way Labourhame seems to be dominated by Nats posting reasonable stuff whenever I go there, not sure if reasonable nats qualify as cybernats or not.
#22 by mav on April 2, 2012 - 8:35 pm
I’d love to know how political donations are tax deductible. Can you let me know how its done? Does it only apply to the SNP?
#23 by Jeff on April 3, 2012 - 7:58 am
Bah, I think I might have got my charitable donations mixed up between income tax and corporation tax. Thanks for pointing out before I put any self assessment forms in!
#24 by Barbarian on April 2, 2012 - 11:13 pm
I almost joined last year, but I think I am too critical and that would upset some of the more long standing members, even if I do suport the SNP and independence.
Part of my problem is that I am an process auditor / analyst by profession, with a role to find problems in a system, and recommend changes. But that upsets a LOT of people, even if – and this may come as a shock – I am rather good on the diplomatic front, and changes are necessary.
What do others think?
(And no, I’m not going to be some sort of subversive unionist Labourite Tory spy!)
#25 by Robert Blake on April 3, 2012 - 10:13 am
I think the idea that all members of a party should sing from the same hymsheet is a silly one
In fact, if they are, that can the sign of problems in the party, and can lead out to some ill-thought out policies granny-tax
#26 by Doug Daniel on April 5, 2012 - 12:42 am
Testers are the bane of a software developer’s life,but without them, we release crappy software.
Join up, and make your voice heard.
#27 by Craig Gallagher on April 3, 2012 - 1:35 am
I don’t think I overstate things when I say this is something of a coup for our party. You’re one of the most thoughtful Scottish bloggers around, Jeff. I’m glad you are (re)joining us for reasons other than simple partisanship.
I’ve been SNP since high school, myself, but I’ve always considered myself open to persuasion away. The Scottish National Party have always managed to keep me in-house by pursuing my socially-left ideals. One thing is for certain, you’re not alone in joining up these days.
#28 by Dr William Reynolds on April 18, 2012 - 3:52 pm
Congratulations Jeff.I am very pleased to hear that you are now an SNP member.