John Swinney MSP brought the 77th SNP Annual Conference to a close with a heartfelt and impassioned speech, declaring that “this is the time to put the wealth of Scotland to work for the people of Scotland.”
He used his conference address to dispel some of the economic myths about Scotland.
First, Scotland might have a deficit but the UK has a higher one. And while Scotland ran a budget surplus in four out of the last five years, the UK was in deficit. Scotland, he suggested, contributes more to the UK in tax revenue than “we get back in UK public spending”. Which means that Scotland is subsidising the rest of the UK.
The conclusion? “Our country pays its way”.
And he revealed that GDP figures show that with an appropriate geographical share of its offshore resources, Scotland would be the sixth wealthiest country in the world. That’s ten places ahead of the UK which sits in sixteenth position.
In the main, his speech concentrated on the day job. He pledged that “our Government will use every one of our limited existing powers to deliver economic growth for Scotland” but warned “our actions are being thwarted by the Con-Dem coalition’s failed policies”.
He called on the UK Government to recognise that its cuts agenda is harming Scotland, demanding they get their “heads out of the sand” and invest in economic recovery.
The Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth contrasted this with the way in which the “SNP Government is delivering real action for Scotland”, working to create the best conditions for employment, to tackle youth unemployment and investing in communities across Scotland to support jobs and promote growth.
He also focused on the Scottish Government’s ambitious investment in preventative spending – “this Government won’t short change Scotland on its future” – and defended the decision to increase the business rates of large retailers who sell tobacco and alcohol. He argued that the increase would amount to just 0.1% of retail turnover in Scotland: “I don’t think it’s too much to ask highly profitable retailers to make a contribution to creating a better future for our people”.
And while most of his colleagues had studiously ignored Labour in their speeches, John Swinney noted that Alistair Darling promised cuts that were toughter and deeper than those of Margaret Thatcher, promising to remind Labour MSPs of this every time they demanded more spending during the budget process.
He also suggested that next May’s local authority elections were “an opportunity to rid Scotland of Labour municipalism”.
Swinney concluded his speech in a highly personal note, recalling that he first came to SNP conference as a teenager, and in the intervening 30 years, he had seen the party grow – and grow. He acknowledged that at times he wondered and doubted whether the “idea that it is best that the people who choose to live in this country should shape her future” would succeed.
But now, he noted, this “is our chance to fulfil the promise we made to our people.” He suggested that the party’s task was simple: “we must go out and persuade and inspire the people of our country that Independence will be right for them” and called on fellow party members to “commit to fulfil our promise to the people of Scotland”.
It was a rousing and fitting end to four days of a conference which kick-started the yes campaign for independence.
#1 by Allan on October 23, 2011 - 7:41 pm
“John Swinney noted that Alistair Darling promised cuts that were toughter and deeper than those of Margaret Thatcher, promising to remind Labour MSPs of this every time they demanded more spending during the budget process.”
Ummm… not just that, but during the conference season Ed Balls backed George’s Scorched Earth policy of cuts and failed to recognise and back any of the available alternatives there is out there to George’s marvelous medicine. You would have thought that Balls would have had something to say about the UK being turned into a sort of tax haven by Gideon, or about the conduct of Dave Hartnett (the head of HMRC) over the sweetheart deals with Vodaphone and Goldman Sachs. But apparently not.
Instead Balls concentrated on the dash for growth, without realising that the sluggish growth he was chastising the government for is a direct consequence of the Scorched Earth cuts programme. Thankfully Swinney has recognised this. But before the “Oh but what would you cut” people appear, he should have flagged up the patiently unfit for purpose HMRC, which is unable to disclose how much money is going uncollected each year in tax because of tax avoidance/evasion schemes.
#2 by cynicalHighlander on October 23, 2011 - 8:18 pm
Nae Limits but you’ll have to provide your own music.
#3 by Barbarian on October 23, 2011 - 8:59 pm
How about 2 Unlimited? :p
And it’s a bit more catchy…… 🙂
#4 by Doug Daniel on October 24, 2011 - 10:12 am
Maybe Alex and Nicola busted the mic at the karaoke as Twa Unlimited?
[“N” – Nicola]
[“A” – Alex]
[A:] Let me hear ye say AYE!
Let me hear ye say AYE!
[N:] Nae nae, nae nae nae nae, nae nae nae nae, nae nae there’s nae limits!
Nae nae, nae nae nae nae, nae nae nae nae, nae nae there’s nae limits!
[N:] Nae, nae limits, we’ll reach fir the sky!
Nae glen ower deep, nae munro ower high
Nae, nae limits, winnae give up the ficht
We dae fit we want an’ we dae it wi’ pride
[A:] Let me hear ye say AYE!
[A:] Hard tae the core, I feel yon floor
Fann ah’m on the stage, ye, ye’ll ask fir mair
Ah’m on the airse, ah ken the last
Ah work rael haird dae ye like ma cash
Tick tick ticka tick tak yer time
Fann ah’m gaan’ ah’m gaan’ fir mine
Open yer ears an’ ye will hear it
Ah tell ye this ‘cos there’s nae limit!
[N:] Nae nae, nae nae nae nae, nae nae nae nae, nae nae there’s nae limits!
Nae nae, nae nae nae nae, nae nae nae nae, nae nae there’s nae limits!
[N:] Nae, nae limits, we’ll reach fir the sky!
Nae glen ower deep, nae munro ower high
Nae, nae limits, winnae give up the ficht
We dae fit we want an’ we dae it wi’ pride
[A:] Nae limits allowed, cos there’s muckle crowd
Microphone check as ah choose ma rhyme
Ah’m playing on the road; ah’ve got nae fear
The soond fir ma moo’ is the rap ye hear
Nae glen ower deep, nae munro ower high
Reach the top, touch the sky!
They tried tae diss me cos ah sell oot
Ah’m makkin’ techno fann ah am proud!
[N:] Nae, nae limits, we’ll reach fir the sky!
Nae glen ower deep, nae munro ower high
Nae, nae limits, winnae give up the ficht
We dae fit we want an’ we dae it wi’ pride
#5 by Barbarian on October 24, 2011 - 2:40 pm
omg…….what have I started!!
As long as the cabinet ain’t dancing (sorry trying) on stage as they did at the end of Alex’s speech. Looked like the final of the World Daddy Dancing Contest, of which I am the World Champion………
#6 by The Burd on October 25, 2011 - 5:09 am
Excellent – do hope you have posted this at yer ain blog!
#7 by Ken on October 24, 2011 - 10:16 am
JS: “The figures show that with a geographical share of our offshore resources Scotland would be the 6th wealthiest country in the world”
That would be amazing. Anyone got a link to the figures?
#8 by Angus McLellan on October 24, 2011 - 2:20 pm
An interesting question. “Wealth” is to be read as GDP per capita in money terms I think. James might disagree with that measure, but at least we have data for it.
The last cash GDP estimates seem to be in this file, with section 10 and the columns headed “GDP including a geographic share of extra-region” being the relevant numbers . Converting that to a per capita number in 2010 US dollars (the IRS conveniently publish average exchange rates by year) we’d get about 41000. In 2010 UK GDP per capita, again in 2010 US dollars, was around 36000.
I think the UK’s 36K USD is 16th on the OECD’s list here and USD 41K looks like it would be 6th. Q.E.D. Right?
Well, maybe not. That’s 6th in the OECD, not worldwide. The IMF’s latest estimates have the UK at 23rd and would put Scotland at 19th. And if you could find another set of figures they would give different results again.
But some caution is needed here. I think the best that can be said about any of these numbers is that they aren’t purposefully inaccurate. The IMF numbers look bizarre for example. And the underlying Office of National Statistics “regional GVA” numbers on which everything is based are, it is said (often in England furth of London), not as good as we might wish. And the underlying assumption that things would look the same if Scotland were independent has to be wrong, but there’s nothing can be done about that without a crystal ball.
#9 by Doug Daniel on October 24, 2011 - 4:48 pm
Regardless of whether Scotland would be 6th and the UK 16th, or Scotland 19th and the UK 23rd (and of course, that’s the UK currently – it would presumably be lower without Scotland bumping the numbers up), the main thing is that an independent Scotland would almost certainly have a higher level of wealth per individual than we currently have.
This is going to be one of the Big Lies of unionists over the coming campaign. They’ll tell us that the UK is the 6th biggest economy in the world and that Scotland couldn’t possibly match that. True, but Norway are in the 20s/30s in the GDP table, whereas India are in the top 10. A quick look at the GDP per capita table, and Norway are number two whereas India are down around 130. I know which country I would rather live in.
#10 by Angus McLellan on October 24, 2011 - 8:01 pm
I already saw the “6th biggest economy” line today in Tory Hoose’s plug for Unity Scotland. So the scaremongers are ahead of you Doug.
Still, you have to laugh. That’ll be *two* Unionist campaigns already, One Dynamic Nation and Unity Scotland. Shouldn’t Unionists be, well, united?
#11 by An Duine Gruamach on October 24, 2011 - 10:35 am
Gin ye’r makkin Alex speak Doric, shid “floor” no be “fleer”? :p
#12 by Doug Daniel on October 25, 2011 - 2:17 am
It widnae hae rhymed!
(Or I just missed that one…)