So week two and frankly, our riches were embarrassed. To pick out just one proved impossible. Too many contenders, far too little time and space to do them all justice.
But trawling through the list of current motions prompted a few observations. It’s all a bit formulaic no? And there is a definite need to refresh the system and its purpose.
There are what can only be termed the micro-motions – wee, timrous, cowrin’ beasties. Where MSPs line up to outdo each other in the hyper-local and this week they seem to be concentrated in Lanarkshire, for some inexplicable reason. So, Cumbernauld BMX club got a nice wee grant from the lottery fund – thanks for sharing that with us Jamie Hepburn MSP; ditto Plains Community Futures for some “planned events”, Archibald Kelly Court Residents Committee in East Kilbride got some lottery dosh for “film nights”, Gill Park Residents and Tenants Association got theirs for a playpark and 1st East Kilbride scout group got a grant to renovate its hall. All worthy of fulsome praise from SNP Central Scotland list MSP Richard Lyle, who finished the latter motion with a flourish: “hopes that the central heating system makes the Scottish winters more bearable”. Gosh.
And then there are the charity touts. Where Parliament will inevitably congratulate, note, recognise, hope, admire and welcome but never, ever ask for something to be done. Redefining anodyne beyond our wildest dreams. Oh we know these are all good, important causes that deserve recognition but there appears to be a textbook template for drafting them that turn them into a snoresfest. Thus, this wee gem from Kezia Dugdale MSP makes Amnesty International, one of the world’s feistiest, bravest and more essential organisations, seem like a knitting bee:
Motion S4M-00627 – Kezia Dugdale ( Lothian ) ( Scottish Labour ) : Standing Up for Freedom
That the Parliament congratulates Amnesty International on what it considers its excellent programme of work at the 2011 Edinburgh Festival; believes that events such as Stand Up For Freedom, the Comics versus Critics football match, Amnesty’s imprisoned writers series and the Amnesty International Freedom of Expression Award, which this year has received a record number of entries, are excellent means of celebrating and promoting freedom of expression, and further congratulates Amnesty on 50 years of relentlessly campaigning for human rights across the world and never letting legislators or governments forget that human rights are important and should be enjoyed by all by virtue of their common humanity.
Campaigning charities exist because they want to right wrongs, and to change the world, or at least their part of it. Often they are radical and fearless and work with the sort of people, the rest of us cross the street to avoid. Scotland is pretty good at the charitable thang – we have lots of voluntary organisations doing great things and folk dig deep to support them. They deserve better from our elected tribunes and actually as well as warm words, most would also welcome a little call to action. Even a teeny weeny one. Once in a while.
Then there are the milestone motions, that mark an anniversary of some kind. Current and recent motions in this vein include one wishing the NHS a happy 63rd birthday, the 25th anniversary of East Kilbride Yamakai Karate club, the 25th anniversary of Burngreen Peace Garden in Kilsyth, and 45 years of East Kilbride and District Engineering Training Association. But our favourite is this one:
S4M-00581 Mark McDonald: Aberdeen University Shinty Club 150th Anniversary—That the Parliament congratulates Aberdeen University Shinty Club on celebrating its one hundred and fiftieth anniversary; notes that the club is recognised as shinty’s oldest constituted club; welcomes the decision by the Camanachd Association to hold the final of the 2011 Aberdein Considine Sutherland cup final between Kingussie and Kyles Athletic at King’s College pitches at the University of Aberdeen as part of the celebrations; further welcomes the outreach work by the Camanachd Association in Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire schools to encourage more young people to take up the sport and hopes that this work will boost the profile of shinty across Scotland; congratulates Kingussie on its 6-1 victory; further notes that past and present players attended a celebration ceilidh and participated in the city of Aberdeen’s Tartan Day parade; also notes that a book celebrating the club’s history, Keeping the Camanachd Flag Flying: 150 Years of Aberdeen University Camanachd, compiled by Steven MacKenzie, has been published with all proceeds going to the club, and wishes Aberdeen University Shinty Club a long and successful competitive future.
Of course, motions that are hyper-local, have a charitable bent AND mark a milestone are the high watermark of achievement – look out for ones in future editions of Worst Motion of the Week…
Finally we have piping wars. No we are not making this up. Last week, we had Colin Keir, SNP MSP for Edinburgh Western, celebrating the return of the Edinburgh Pipe Band championships and Derek MacKay, another of the newsbies, marking similar in Paisley. This week, we have this from Marco Biagi MSP about bagpipes on the Royal Mile:
“Motion S4M-00612 –
That the Parliament welcomes the agreement between the City of
Edinburgh Council and Royal Mile traders to ensure that the volume of
bagpipe music played by retailers does not exceed irresponsible levels
from August 2011; recognises the importance of residents, traders and
tourists all being able to carry out their daily activities in a
respectful environment; believes that this action will reflect well on
the Royal Mile’s status as part of a World Heritage Site, and would
welcome greater variety overall in the commercial offerings on the
Royal Mile so that Edinburgh’s medieval heart continues to thrive.
while Stuart McDonald MSP for the West of Scotland proclaims the World’s Biggest Week of Piping:
“That the Parliament welcomes what is considered to be the world’s biggest week of traditional music, held between 8 and 14 August 2011 in Glasgow; notes that tens of thousands of traditional music fans and 8,000 pipers, drummers and performers will descend on the city for Piping Live!, Glasgow’s International Piping Festival and the World Pipe Band Championships; further notes that the World Pipe Band Championships or ‘the Worlds’ have predominantly been held in Glasgow for around 70 years while Piping Live! is entering its 8th year and has established itself as one of the world’s top celebrations of Scottish culture, showcasing a diverse blend of traditional music; acknowledges the importance of these cultural events, and wishes the festival and all participants the very best.”
One man’s peace is clearly another man’s pipe.
#1 by Zoe Smith on August 12, 2011 - 8:07 am
S4M- 666- That the Parliament publishes details of the costs involved in the administration of motions; considers that the majority of them are nothing more than an attempt to appease and feature in the local press; encourages MSPs to foster proper relationships with the press by doing useful and or interesting things in their constituencies/regions instead; notes how spurious the vast majority of motions are; acknowledges that is is perhaps a bit of a waste of time as only MSPs, Parliamentary staff, political anoraks and unimaginative local hacks read them; considers making it a little more difficult for MSP’s to publicise their interest in local issues; congratulates Better Nation for revealing just what an utter farce the whole system is and hopefully encouraging a more imaginative use of the system in the future.
#2 by Jeff on August 12, 2011 - 9:39 am
Ha, excellent. It won’t get put forward for Parliament though, far too sensible.
Although, 129 MSPs out there, surely one is tempted to write something like your suggestion Zoe? Hmm…
#3 by Gavin Hamilton on August 12, 2011 - 10:09 am
Question.
Where can I view these motions for myself – easily?
Not that I want to do that for I might go blind!
#4 by Jeff on August 12, 2011 - 10:13 am
http://scottish.parliament.uk/Apps2/MAQASearch/QAndMSearch.aspx
I have to warn you though Gavin, flicking through them gets strangely addicitve…!
#5 by Zoe Smith on August 12, 2011 - 10:37 am
Tread cautiously or before you know it you’ll be losing two hours a week and you’ll find yourself with an extensive knowledge of coffee mornings, school eco flags and scout jamborees in areas of Scotland you probably couldn’t point to on a map.
#6 by Gavin Hamilton on August 12, 2011 - 11:29 am
I have learned about rowing from the Shetlands to the Faroe Isles already!!!
#7 by Ina on August 12, 2011 - 10:14 am
I’m pretty sure it says somewhere in the standards about what motions can and cannot be used for and the purpose of them, which is for local issues – it’s extremely limiting and the wording permitted is altered by Parliament. For example, they cannot call for action if they wish the motion to be considered for member’s business. MSPs are restricted in what they can submit a motion on, I don’t think they should be blamed entirely but perhaps the rules surrounding what is permissible in motions should be examined.
#8 by Jeff on August 12, 2011 - 11:00 am
Good points. I’d step even further back than that and start questioning what the point of motions are at all. I find PQs to be a much more important tool and if motions can be limited in order to free up resources for more PQs to be asked (and, crucially, answered), then the Parliament will be better off for it.
But yes, MSPs can only operate within the parameters of the rules set down in front of them so I guess they are not entirely blameless. They still write the things though (or parli assistants do at least, as I’m sure you’re well aware…!)
#9 by Indy on August 12, 2011 - 10:28 am
S4M- 007- That the Parliament recognises the 30th anniversary of Shakin Stevens reaching number one in the hit parade with “Green Doorâ€, considers it to be an outstanding example of what is widely acknowledged to be a pop song, notes that the composer of Green Door was Bob Davies, with lyrics written by Marvin Moore, and further notes that Bob Davies had an auntie from Largs; congratulates the people of Largs on their connection to Bob Davies, the composer of “Green Door†which reached number one in the hit parade thirty years ago, and considers that both Bob Davies and Shakin Stevens should be congratulated on their contribution to a vibrant and diverse popular culture.
As an amendment to motion S4M-007-insert at end “however deplores Mr Stevens’ long standing commitment to double denim, which it considers to be one of the aspects of the 1980s that, along with Thatcherism, should never be revisited irrespective of what may lurk behind doors of any colour.
#10 by Zoe Smith on August 12, 2011 - 10:49 am
You win! If only because you would raise the issue of double denim in the Parliament- it’s an issue that’s been overlooked for far too long. I am sick of being “forced” to approve of double denim.
#11 by Gavin Hamilton on August 12, 2011 - 10:33 am
Thanks Jeff.
I shall book mark.
On a quick glance I see what you mean !
I shall study at my leisure later.
Nothing like improving Scotland one step at a time! 😀
#12 by Richard on August 12, 2011 - 10:51 am
I feel I should point this motion out from earlier in the session:
Motion S4M-00040: Christine Grahame (Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale) (SNP) : Parliament Noticeboard
“That the Parliament considers that the reconvened Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee, or its successor committee, should review Standing Orders in relation to the admissibility of motions in order that those of a congratulatory nature be deemed inadmissible and that a procedure be established for a publically available noticeboard where such motions can be placed for a period of, for example, two weeks.”
#13 by Jeff on August 12, 2011 - 10:57 am
Here, here!
Well said Christine Grahame.
#14 by James on August 12, 2011 - 3:37 pm
Yes! (having written one or two myself)
#15 by theshooglypeg on August 12, 2011 - 11:19 am
I have long deplored the absence of Shakin’ Stevens related motions in the Parliament and welcome with relief, gusto and indeed delight the redressing of this situation.
Is redressing a word? Anyway I completely agree with you: though as somebody who works for a charity, I can report that there is one small aspect that is useful. If somebody puts their name to a motion that is relevant to your campaigning area, it’s a good way of finding out that they might be interested in supporting your cause, and gives you an excuse to ask them for a meeting.
I’m obviously not saying that this justifies them at all, there are lots of other ways that we can (and do) find out who’s interested in our cause, it’s just a tiny positive aspect within the otherwise soupy pointlessness of it all.
#16 by Marco Biagi on August 12, 2011 - 11:58 am
Like Halle Berry at the Razzies, let me pipe up.
*cough* 100 calls a day *cough*
But enough of that. Yes, we should change the motion system. I personally think that a good idea would be that any motion had to be submitted with a number of signatures already to be valid. That would raise the threshold for submission. I also think it would be better if it wasn’t just the anodyne ones that stood a chance of being debated, and if maybe a backbench motion got voted on now and then.
#17 by Jeff on August 12, 2011 - 12:16 pm
Thanks for the comment Marco,
Can I just say, before anything else. I was in Edinburgh last weekend and wandered along to Cafe Royale past a tartan tat shop at St Andrew’s Square. The soft, muted drone of bagpipes wafting out of the shop was music to my ears and stood in stark contrast to the wailing and flailing of Scotland the Brave et al that I was ordinarily used to. I take my tartan bunnet off to you Sir, a success story already deserving of reelection if you ask me.
Your motion suggestions sound good to me; having to have x signatures should concentrate minds as to what is really valid and what is not. And the more cutting motions getting into the Chamber would create better debates and show Parliament in a better light so, yeah, sounds good.
#18 by Marco Biagi on August 12, 2011 - 12:31 pm
Credit where credit is due – it was Cllr David Beckett’s victory on the Royal Mile bagpiping. Definitely deserving of recognition.
#19 by James on August 12, 2011 - 3:38 pm
There’s been two more about piping today (in favour, unlike Marco’s heroic offering)..
And this from a well-known Tory researcher who from time to time does hit reply-all to particularly anodyne ones..
Apart from the Tory self-promotion, hear hear!
#20 by Jeff on August 12, 2011 - 4:39 pm
Not just a Holyrood problem apparently:
http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2010-12/432
#21 by Barbarian on August 12, 2011 - 11:04 pm
I like the motions. Almost as good as PMQs or FMQs when the competition on the government side is to see who is furthest up the metaphorical backside of the leader.
The motions allow the MSPs to remind us that we voted for them and not Alex Salmond, the omnipresent one!! :p
Or in the case of Labour, the Great Escape.
And let us not forget the Not-So-Famous Five of the Lib Dems….
Time for my medication…….
#22 by douglas clark on August 13, 2011 - 3:29 am
It is about time someone in the Scottish Parliament welcomed the fact that Better Nation has been around for nearly a year and has almost 302 people favouring it. This, perhaps, previously unheard of coming together of the intellegencia of the internet is worthy of recognition in the Scottish Parliament and beyond.
It is without fear or favour that I suggest that Nobel Prizes are awarded to all of the editors of the aforesaid blog.
Editor: Your fired.
Pingback: Best motion of the week – James Kelly « Better Nation