One news story that caught my eye this morning was the SNP complaint that a young girl (who happens to have a Labour MSP as a relative) has been granted £9,000 a year in taxi fares in order to attend Dance School of Scotland in Knightswood throughout the year. The story struck me in light of yesterday’s discussion on Better Nation where Kate (SNP) wrote “Carping, sniping, empty posturing. That’s what the people rejected, so we’ll (Labour’ll) give them more of the same.†and Aidan Skinner (Lab) followed up with “The other thing is that there’s a developing and hardening narrative that the SNP are relentlessly positive, above the old, discredited politics and offering something new. They aren’t.â€.
It didn’t take long for a bit of evidence to back up Aidan’s point.
I vividly remember the one kid in our school who wanted to do German and had to get a taxi out to Kilsyth every other day to make this happen (as we had no German teachers). The girl lost out on a good half an hour of her lunch break whenever these trips took place and had to sit on her own in a class of strangers. So, obviously, we thought she was mental. Now, of course, I’m 15 years older and wiser(?) and I’m in a relationship with someone who speaks three languages and I, luddite Brit that I am, only speak the one, the dearth of opportunities open to Scottish youngsters now abundantly clear.
A Scotland where we don’t aspire to be creative, cultural, sporty, healthy and knowledgeable because it’s too hard or it costs too much or it means ‘the other lot’ might win a few more votes than us is a terrible prospect for our nation to find itself in and, yet, hardly a day goes by that a headline doesn’t relate to something along those lines. How do so many other countries find it so easy to make all the pieces fall into place? Why is it so damn hard for Scots to better themselves and feel good about it, all at the same time?
So, it is disappointing to see the SNP acting in this way. North Lanarkshire council has a £3.7m fund to spend on moving children around to match potential with opportunities and this case of a young girl going to dance classes in Scotland’s only centre of excellence looks like a no-brainer decision to me. If the local councillors know that the family are multi-millionaires or the little girl can’t dance for toffee (unlikely if Scotland’s leading dance school is welcoming her in), then they should state their arguments accordingly but throwing mud in the hope that it sticks just because Labour happens to be distantly involved really does undermine any complaints that the Nats may have regarding any mudslinging coming their way, particularly involving Brian Souter.
I can’t see any problem with the taxpayer helping to make sure this girl gets the best chance to dance and, if the SNP wants to really have the positive vision for a better Scotland that it regularly claims to, I’d be surprised if they had any real problems with it either. But then, I would say that, because I really can’t dance for toffee.
#1 by Zoe Smith on August 11, 2011 - 8:57 am
I largely agree that talent and potential should be fed and when local shortfalls in provision make this difficult then this seems like a good use of money.
But!
Having had to spend 12 years chasing an appropriate education for my autistic son- (we live in NE Fife- no autism specific education- hop over the Tay to Dundee and there’s quite a lot on offer) and repeatedly being told that local provision is all he could have I am a little irked by this story.
It’s just another basic inequality, the kind you sadly get well used to when raising a child with a disability. For every talented youngster being nurtured in this way there are several youngsters who are making do with local provision and not meeting their potential as a result.
Scotland doesn’t really “need” more good dancers but it could do with autistic adults who are able to care for themselves and contribute to society- especially as we still don’t have their interests protected within the Parliament itself in any formal way.
#2 by Jeff on August 11, 2011 - 9:39 am
Well, I can of course sympathise with the frustrations that that must involve Zoe, particularly when there seems to be a mix of services across Scotland rather than a standard approach across councils but I still maintain that we should be driving aspirations up, not pulling them down. To an extent, you have been failed by your local council but why that means you should in any way wish a different council to not assist a young girl with dance classes, I don’t really understand. It shouldn’t be a case of one or the other. And I disagree with you when you say ‘Scotland doesn’t need dancers’, a country without a thriving arts scene is an awful prospect.
Stepping back from individual local issues; the other concern is that there is simply not enough money for pretty basic expectations to be met. This, for me, is where questioning of the reluctance to raise council tax and non-use of the SVR comes into play.
#3 by Zoe Smith on August 11, 2011 - 9:54 am
You’re right, it shouldn’t be a choice between one or the other and again you’re right that there just isn’t enough money- which is why I am fundamentally opposed to the freeze on council tax (whichever manifesto proposes it or indeed adopts it last minute).
I see the effects all the time- not just on specialist provision but on the future in general. I agree that a country without a thriving arts scene (and the same could be said for sports too) would be a very bad thing but when schools are having to cut back on what they offer due to funding restrictions we are probably nipping a lot of talent in the bud, many children will never get the chance to show that they could meet the standards required to even be considered for this kind of provision.
I’ve been party to discussions about council tax and it’s possible replacements for more years than I care to remember but it seems no party is particularly keen to do much about it at the moment. Until we’re actually paying enough to provide what Scotland’s children need and deserve across the board then success stories like this (which no doubt have a background of highly motivated, persistent parents) will be the exception.
#4 by Douglas McLellan on August 11, 2011 - 9:41 am
I cant actually believe the SNP are complaining about this. After all, they are continuing to push money wasting all-Gaelic schools in many parts of the country that have never, ever been part of Gaelic speaking Scotland. Like Edinburgh.
#5 by DougtheDug on August 11, 2011 - 9:53 am
Spoken like a true Lib-Dem.
Say one thing in your manifesto:
Support Gaelic medium education where there is demand…
http://www.scotlibdems.org.uk/files/SLD2011manifesto.pdf
Page 26.
And then ignore it after the election.
#6 by Douglas McLellan on August 11, 2011 - 10:37 am
You think I was happy that was in there (my argument was based on the fact that in certain places in Scotland there could well demand for education in other languages so how many first languages do we have to meet)?
Had I stood anywhere then I would have to back that policy but I didnt so I wont.
#7 by An Duine Gruamach on August 11, 2011 - 3:35 pm
The difference is that there is no demand for schools in other languages, there is for Gaelic. The Gaelic unit at Tollcross is growing because the demand *does* exist. It’s not some bright-spark SNP idea, it’s parents driving this.
One often sees this vapid line of argument when Gaelic or (heaven forfend!) Scots education is discussed, but I’d like to know how many Polish medium schools there are in Wales or Arabic medium schools there are in Catalonia before it can be accepted as being anything like valid.
#8 by Zoe Smith on August 11, 2011 - 10:02 am
Indeed, my 6 year old son can recite many poems in Scots but the specialist maths provision he needs (on account of being “gifted”- which obviously he gets from me) is patchy and inconsistent. I’m Scottish born and bred, raised in the Highlands and don’t speak a word of Gaelic or Scots. I’m all for educating children about their heritage but the current curriculum appears to almost invent a heritage for our children and teach accordingly. It’s a waste of money, money we don’t really have.
#9 by DougtheDug on August 11, 2011 - 10:20 am
Gaelic medium isn’t about teaching children about their heritage it’s about educating them in their own language.
Gaelic is not an invented heritage but I’d love it if you gave some examples of invented Scottish heritage taught in Scottish schools.
#10 by Zoe Smith on August 11, 2011 - 10:38 am
But it’s not their own language- my children speak English (albeit with lovely Fife accents)- as do I and as does their father. I speak more French than I do Gaelic.
Every time my children are asked at school to write poem in Gaelic or Scots or “find out what your grandparents are called then find out what their Gaelic names would be” or “draw a map of your town, with the street names in Scots”- they are being introduced to something false, something invented for the sake of ticking a box in the curriculum guidelines.
Our heritage is Scottish without a doubt but neither Gaelic nor Scots feature.
#11 by DougtheDug on August 11, 2011 - 11:18 am
The North Haugh
The Links
Granny Clark’s Wynd
Cockshaugh Park
Glebe Road
Aye, not a lot of Scots Street names in St. Andrews.
#12 by Douglas McLellan on August 11, 2011 - 10:45 am
So why no Hindi, Urdu schools or Punjabi? No Polish schools?
#13 by Jeff on August 11, 2011 - 10:51 am
On the fairly regular occasions that people ask me if I speak any Gaelic, I am embarrassed when I have to say ‘No’ so I am happy for ‘some’ resources to go into this.
Noone ever asks me if I speak Urdu.
#14 by Douglas McLellan on August 11, 2011 - 10:58 am
Why be embarrassed? Is it something that your family speaks but you didn’t take it up as a child?
I dont get the comment about Urdu? Unless you were being facetious.
#15 by Jeff on August 11, 2011 - 11:03 am
Did the Catalans cave in and speak Spanish? Did the Welsh cave in and speak English? How is Maori getting on in New Zealand?
I think there is a lot to be embarrassed about when it comes to the slipping away of Scots Gaelic.
#16 by Douglas McLellan on August 11, 2011 - 11:18 am
You should only be embarrassed if you believe that it was a language that all of Scotland spoke. It didnt. It never did. It has never been the language of the Scots.
The catalan language continues to be spoken by more people than the population of Scotland. It is the language of the region (upto and including a city on an Italian island). I have no issue with Gaelic being taught in the parts of the country that spoke it. All of Wales at one point was Welsh speaking.
The Burgh in Edinburgh is germanic in origin which speak more of our links there than with Gaelic.
Welsh is the langaueg
#17 by Zoe Smith on August 11, 2011 - 10:58 am
My son is in a class of 26 children- 2 native polish speakers, 1 native Spanish speaker, I native German speaker, 1 native Urdu speaker, 1 native Arabic speaker (it’s St Andrews- the school is like the UN!) any of these would be more useful.
‘some’ resources is the key phrase here.
#18 by DougtheDug on August 11, 2011 - 10:54 am
Ahh…The classic put down of Gaelic. Where it’s assigned the same status as minority immigrant languages in its own country in order to separate it out and marginalise within mainstream Scottish culture.
#19 by Douglas McLellan on August 11, 2011 - 11:01 am
But to me and the rest of my family going back the several generations a genealogist looked at for my Dad, Gaelic has never been a feature of their lives or where they lived. Scots yes, Gaelic no.
#20 by Indy on August 11, 2011 - 11:36 am
I don’t think the status of any language should be central to decisions on education. The education of children is all that matters. I don’t have any issues with Gaelic medium education – but equally I don’t think speakers of Gaelic should be priveliged over speakers of Hindi, Urdu, Punjabi, Polish or anything else. Except of course that all children who have a second language are in a sense priveliged, in our very mono-lingual society at least.
#21 by DougtheDug on August 11, 2011 - 11:58 am
“… but equally I don’t think speakers of Gaelic should be priveliged over speakers of Hindi, Urdu, Punjabi, Polish or anything else.”
So being an indigenous Scottish language and part of Scottish culture counts for nothing then? It’s just another minority language in your PC eyes with no more connection to Scottish culture than Punjabi. You’ve bought wholesale into the idea that Gaelic is not really part of Scottish culture and that Gaelic exists not as a partner language to English in Scotland but as an embedded minority extra. In a way a linguistic mirror to Scotland’s current political situation.
Let’s put it another way. If Hindi, Urdu, Punjabi or Polish die out in Scotland they’ve got tens and in some cases hundreds of millions of speakers left out there. If Gaelic dies out in Scotland that’s it. It’s gone. So lets treat it just like Hindi in Scotland eh?
#22 by Douglas McLellan on August 11, 2011 - 4:28 pm
So why not have Doric schools? Or Scots? Orcadian?
#23 by DougtheDug on August 11, 2011 - 6:17 pm
As Doric (Scots) is the other strand of Scotland’s distinctive linguistic heritage I think a School teaching in Scots is a wonderful idea.
It’s rather disappointing though that you are using Doric as the absurd part of your reductio ad absurdum argument against Gaelic.
#24 by Indy on August 11, 2011 - 9:38 pm
It counts for precisely nothing in educational terms. Teachers are there to teach children not make cultural judgements. As I said I have no problem with Gaelic medium education but it’s the education that matters you know, not the medium.
#25 by DougtheDug on August 11, 2011 - 10:04 pm
Teachers are there to teach children not make cultural judgements.
The choice of the language of instruction is a very important cultural judgement in education and is not made by the teachers though they enforce it.
Why do think the Chinese government schools teach only through Mandarin in Tibet and that the Soviet Union had a program of Russification in the Baltics. In 1978 a nation-wide decree imposed Russian from pre-school through university throughout the USSR.
To pretend that language used in education is immaterial in the education of a country’s children is simple willful blindness.
#26 by Tony on August 11, 2011 - 3:32 pm
Very much the same arguments as Irish unionists use against the Irish language. The hysterical desire to be British means that all native culture is an object of hatred, weird. Can’t believe that I am witnessing it here.
#27 by Tony on August 11, 2011 - 3:28 pm
Gaelic was still the spoken language in fife well into the 16thC until Scots took over, nothing is invented it is all their waiting to be re-discovered.
I know that highlanders learnt English from the English before Scots had a chance but the fact that you can live in the great kingdom of Fife and not know any words of Scots is astonishing.
#28 by Gavin Hamilton on August 11, 2011 - 9:50 am
I agree with Zoe here!
I also couldn’t get past the Aidan Skinner quote at the start of Jeff’s piece.
“…there’s a developing and hardening narrative that the SNP are relentlessly positive, above the old, discredited politics and offering something new. They aren’t.”
This is very true – it seems from many posts by many bloggers over the last few months that criticism and diagreement with the SNP – ‘the national partry of Scotland’ is not especially tolerated.
Iain Gray always gets a slagging for this, now Willie Rennie is getting criticism.
Interesting – I thought – before I read what anyone else thought that he was making some valid criticisms well delivered in what is his job as a parliamentarian and leader of one of the parties.
I thought he was being fairly articulate and reasonably intelligent and doing a good job in the tough gig of being Lib Dem leader this weather!
But apparently this and other criticisms is a bad thing.
Wrong!
Robust debate and pluralism are at the heart of our democracy and is a good thing and criticism of the national party IS allowed!
This is just a trend this year and I hope just a passing phase because the SNP don’t have all the answers and I don’t think their range of policies and philosophy is that deep – or different from anyone else’s – that it doesn’t leave room for plenty of debate and ‘ideation’ from elsewhere.
Glad I got that off my chest 🙂
#29 by Gavin Hamilton on August 11, 2011 - 10:14 am
Dougythedug
isn’t the point ‘where there is demand’
isn’t Douglas Mc therefore being consistent?
#30 by DougtheDug on August 11, 2011 - 10:22 am
Here.
http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=6069344
#31 by Douglas McLellan on August 11, 2011 - 10:55 am
Indeed there is a demand. So it is being met. There is a demand for this girl to get her taxi rides. So why is the SNP moaning about it?
I await with interest to see the results of the census and Gaelic speaking (and other languages). Do we think Edinburgh will still be so statistically irrelevant when in comes to the reporting of Gaelic speaking in Scotland that the GRO Scotland report will lump the city in the “Rest of Scotland” column like it did for its 2001 report?
#32 by An Duine Gruamach on August 11, 2011 - 3:41 pm
Hard to say. The numbers of Gaelic speakers in Edinburgh will probably be slightly up on the 2001 figures, since the Tollcross school has continued to expand all the while. It’ll also be interesting to see the balance of Highland/Lowland Gaelic speakers. In 2001 it was about 55%/45%, which must be a right pain in the situpon for those who are convinced Gaelic should only be spoken far away from them.
#33 by Indy on August 11, 2011 - 10:19 am
The validity of Cllr McTaggart’s comments depends on whether the rules have been properly applied or whether they haven’t. But it is primarily a local story.
#34 by Jeff on August 11, 2011 - 10:26 am
Surely it’s poor form to raise your concerns through the media until you know, or are at least sure, that the rules have not been properly applied?
#35 by Indy on August 11, 2011 - 10:55 am
How do you know the story came from the SNP? The story said that neither the youngster’s name nor her relationship to the MSP were revealed in the council minutes. (And rightly so in my opinion). So we don’t really know where it came from. I note it is in the Daily Record as well. I’d be surprised if the SNP passed a story to them. They may have done so of course but it would be suprising.
#36 by Stuart Winton on August 11, 2011 - 10:21 am
Not sure about the precise details of the case, Jeff, but £9,000 a year seems a bit much to shell out on one kid for something like this when others can’t even get a basic education.
That’s almost as much as someone on the minimum wage takes home.
#37 by Gavin Hamilton on August 11, 2011 - 10:40 am
Dougy the Dug
If that’s the case then there is a demand/need for it in Edinburgh and it as ok thing to do.
#38 by setindarkness on August 11, 2011 - 11:27 am
Don’t be so negative about the SNPs negativity towards other parties negativity about the SNP
To be fair, though, Labour’s unremitting negativity simply sets themselves up for it every time
#39 by Zoe Smith on August 11, 2011 - 11:34 am
*likes post, kills self for alluding to Facebook, kills self again for dragging the tone of Better Nation down by importing her much loved use of twitter speak, particularly the description of actions within asterisks*
#40 by Dr William Reynolds on August 11, 2011 - 11:36 am
I first noticed this issue in the Scotsman.Typical Scotsman heading “Taxpayers fork out 27,000 pounds so that MSP’s relative can get taxi’s to dance school”My first point is that the Scotsman likes titles that are somewhat judgemental.Similarly today,they had one that stated:”Salmond states that Scotland is safer than England.” The fct that Salmond said nothing of the sort,doesn’t seem to matter to the Scotsman.Thus the Scotsman can be guilty of misleading and making the news rather than reporting and analysing the news.My point is that many people see the headlines and jump to conclusion.In the case of the young teenager who wants to go to a dance school 20 miles from her home,many people are likely to be judgmental when they don’t know the facts,as a consequence of the Scotsmans style.I can remember a time when the Scotsman was a quality paper.
Regarding the Scotsmans report,we are informed that the an SNP councillor,John Taggert said that children with special needs would be supported,but that councilling funding priorities made it difficult to support this young girl.now I have an open mind about this issue and take no sides.One councillor in one local authority does not represent all views in the SNP.Some of us like to examine the merits of the case and make our own conclusions.We are not all (as Douglas implies) moaning about it.I don’t have enough detail to assess the merits of the decision that was made,and I suspect that many others in the SNP would be supportive towards the needs of this young teenager.The fact hat she is a relative of a labour MSP is totally irrelevant.I don’t see this as being a party political issue.
#41 by An Duine Gruamach on August 11, 2011 - 3:44 pm
The “controversy” about Scotland being safer than England confused me somewhat as well. I’ve jist keeked oot the windae and… nope: nae riots.
#42 by NoOffenceAlan on August 11, 2011 - 11:59 am
Yes, the SNP are “relentlessly positive” about the Edinburgh trams project, aren’t they?
#43 by Gavin Hamilton on August 11, 2011 - 12:04 pm
Ha! – setindarkness
Just don’t want to be assimilated by the Borg!
😀 😀
#44 by aonghas on August 11, 2011 - 12:06 pm
Given the limited funds, the costs/benefits of government spending need to be weighed up – just saying “getting to go to dance classes is nice and good, ergo this spending is justified” isn’t an argument. e.g., can the thousands spent on this girl be spent more fruitfully elsewhere?
However having said that, so many folk are milking the system for much larger amounts that I can’t summon up much outrage at this situation.
Good to see the mean-spirited obsession with the jackboot of Gaelic cultural domination is alive and well.
#45 by CassiusClaymore on August 11, 2011 - 12:19 pm
No wonder our taxes are through the roof, with pointless expenditure like this.
This girl’s father is a higher-rate taxpayer who can easily afford to transport the wee girl to and fro if it’s sufficiently important to the family.
Quite why we’re funding it is beyond me. Presumably because he’s a Labour politician and enriching his family at the expense of the taxpayer is hard-wired into his DNA.
The amount of OUR money wasted by useless councils (and the Scottish and UK governments too) is an absolute disgrace. Folk are on waiting lists for houses and medical treatment, and meantime councils are wasting money on taxis for the children of the rich.
Astonishing, and worth remembering the next time you hear a Labour cooncil bleating about not having enough of our money.
CC
#46 by Aidan Skinner on August 11, 2011 - 2:16 pm
“Presumably because he’s a Labour politician and enriching his family at the expense of the taxpayer is hard-wired into his DNA.” Stay positive!
#47 by CassiusClaymore on August 11, 2011 - 12:31 pm
Correction – grandfather, not father. Makes it even worse. Wealthy grandfathers are supposed to indulge their grandchildren, not chisel money oot their party colleagues on the Council on their behalf!
CC
#48 by Indy on August 11, 2011 - 1:54 pm
In fairness the child is attending the National Dance School. It is the only centre of excellence in Scotland – so it’s not as if it was just a wee dance class.
I think eyebrows are being raised at the support for travel costs taking the form of a taxi rather than subsidising bus/train fares.
There may be reasons for that, I don’t know, the whole issue seems to be a storm in a tea cup really.
#49 by An Duine Gruamach on August 11, 2011 - 3:46 pm
Well, indeed. A couple of friends of mine at school got a subsidy towards their bus fares because they had to come in a fair way to get to the only school in Edinburgh that offered Gaelic. They didn’t get taxis.
#50 by CassiusClaymore on August 11, 2011 - 3:08 pm
Aidan – sorry, what’s your point? Why am I supposed to be positive about your party, when there is so little to admire?
Just as a random example, the Chancellor has just revealed that Gordon Brown’s sale of the UK gold reserves has, at today’s price, cost the UK £12 billion. How can one put a positive spin on that?!
CC
#51 by Aidan Skinner on August 11, 2011 - 4:42 pm
you’re adorable
#52 by Tony on August 11, 2011 - 3:24 pm
Type your comment here
Douglas
Your insistance on distancing us from our heritage is sad. The Scots were a tribe who lived in the north of ireland and the west of Scotland, they spoke gaelic. The rest of Scotland spoke a language akin to Welsh until overtaken by gaelic, which was eventually itself undone by Scots which most of us speak every day unless they have bought into the Scots as slang myth. Which again is sad.
#53 by theshooglypeg on August 11, 2011 - 3:53 pm
I entirely agree re the culture of negativity in politics. I am increasingly depressed by the inability of so many people to see things in any way other than through the lens of their particular party membership. But am I the only person who wondered why we couldn’t pay for her to get the bus instead of a taxi?
#54 by Indy on August 11, 2011 - 9:44 pm
As I said, I think that is what is raising eyebrows. But we don’t know anything about this girl’s circumstances other than who her grandad is, so it’s all speculative and a bit pointless really.
#55 by The Burd on August 11, 2011 - 10:25 pm
I agree Shoogly peg – this is a teenager who could have been given a bus pass or train season ticket at a fraction of the cost. And I’m afraid i don’t see this as a purely negative intervention – John pentland’s relation to the child in question is only an issue if he voted or participated in any way in the decision. I have greater difficulty with the fact that I know that North Lanarkshire council like many others are cutting to the bone their legal requirement to provide safe and appropriate transport for disabled children to get to and from school and some families are having to fight tooth and nail to get support they are legally entitled to. If the SNP had stuck to this being a policy rather than a personality issue then they would have had a better case. The fact they didn’t is a sad reflection on the current state of Scottish politics. IMHO!
#56 by Observer on August 11, 2011 - 6:07 pm
The school is within walking distance of Anniesland Train Station, which via the lowline connection is connected to Motherwell/Wishaw.
However I understand it is custom & practise to waste vast amounts of money on taxi fares, rather than public transport; so it was clearly unfair to single out this lassie, & it doesn’t make the SNP look good.
#57 by Don McC on August 11, 2011 - 6:33 pm
Aiden, are you now being critical of the SNP because they’re NOT relentlessly positive? You talk about “a developing and hardening narrative” but the only place I’ve ever seen that is on Labour’shame, where they even posted a spoof article in the guise of Salmond.
So lets see where we are – you and your ilk set up the premise that the SNP are “relentlessly positive” and push that premise to any that will listen (I take it there’s still one or two gullible fools on the go). You then attack Salmond when he doesn’t live up to the image YOU INVENTED!
Fortunately, many of us are beyond these pathetic tactics so they have no effect.
#58 by Aidan Skinner on August 11, 2011 - 8:48 pm
http://www2.snp.org/both_votes_snp_to_re_elect_alex_salmond_as_first_minister
http://www.lindafabiani.co.uk/2011/03/30/a-few-reasons-to-vote-snp/
http://www.notosh.com/2011/05/we-made-history-the-best-new-media-team-in-uk-political-campaigning/
Whist.
#59 by Don McC on August 11, 2011 - 9:15 pm
Ah, yet another fool who can’t differentiate between the desire to have a message that’s positive and optimistic in tone and a party itself.
Your links prove nothing. Labour’shame accuse the SNP themselves of being relentlessly positive, not for having a message that’s relentlessly positive. You set up the image and then criticise the First Minister for not meeting that image. It’s a cheap trick and it doesn’t work outside the confines of the hootsman and other labour mouthpieces.
Top Trumps indeed.
#60 by DougtheDug on August 11, 2011 - 6:37 pm
Jeff,
Like some other schools of excellence in Scotland such as Plockton and Dyce, Knightswood has residential accommodation for pupils who come from across Scotland.
I’ve no idea about the girl’s home circumstances such as the availability of a car or public transport or if there was a place available in the accommodation in Knightswood but at £9,000 a year guaranteed for three years it is legitimate to ask if other options were considered. Funding a family car at 40p a mile would cut the costs by a factor three and the accommodation is free and already funded by the Scottish Government.
If these options were explored and there was money in the transport budget then I don’t think anyone should carp about funding a talented teenager to go to a School of Excellence.
Just a point. “North Lanarkshire council has a £3.7m fund to spend on moving children around to match potential with opportunities” is not correct. Every local authority has to legally fund travel for pupils who live more than walking distance from the school. If the pupil is going to a school outside their catchment area then the funding is discretionary.
There is no requirement to provide transport for pupils who have been
granted a placing request to attend a school other than the school in whose
catchment area they reside.
The relevant Act is the Education (Scotland) Act 1980, Sections 42(4) and
51(1), as amended by the Education (Scotland) Act 1981, Section 2, the
Education (Scotland) Act 1996, Schedule 5 and the Standards in Scotland’s
Schools etc Act 2000, Section 37.
#61 by Barbarian on August 11, 2011 - 11:58 pm
Lots of balanced comments on here, which is important when discussing such issues.
It’s heartening to see that there are other SNP supporters (and others) who are prepared to make a proper debate without resorting to insults seen on some other sites.
The biggest danger to independence are some of the nationalists themselves.
Better Nation is an excellent blog and one I will be recommending to others.
#62 by Jeff on August 12, 2011 - 11:02 am
Very kind of you Barbarian, always nice to get some positive feedback.
A blog without comments is poorer for it so pats on the back all round…