At the risk of giving the Scottish Conservatives far more ether-coverage than they are used to, or they deserve, another blogpost from me on their leadership contest.
So far there isn’t actually a contest, what with Jackson Carlaw MSP, the only one to show his hand. But you read it here first. Ruth Davidson will win.
Reliable sources, as they say, advise that she will stand and that she is garnering support from some of the party’s big guns. Apparently, the constituency party with the most members, Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire (John Lamont MSP’s seat), will vote for her. So too will David Mundell MP’s seat, Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale. Ditto John Scott MSP’s Ayr.
And these three constituencies count for big swathes of the party’s membership. It also indicates that not only does Ms Davidson carry the outgoing leader, Annabel Goldie’s, patronage but support from some of the party’s biggest hitters. In a party of 15 MSPs and 1 MP, she has effectively sewn up a quarter of that high level support. No doubt there are others in the wings too. Struan Stevenson MEP touted her leadership qualities when Malc and I caught up with him in Strasbourg in June (as you do) so there’s another of the party’s elected representatives in her court. And Struan’s a popular figure whose opinion will also count.
Anyone with a geography O/standard grade will have worked out that so far Ms Davidson’s support is from the South of Scotland. Murdo Fraser MSP is also likely to stand and no doubt he will pick up most of his support from his North East – ahem – heartlands. Like Jackson Carlaw, though, he’s tainted. While he has bestrode (bestridden?) this part of Scotland like a colossus, traditionally Tory territory has fallen to the Nats. Like snaw off a dyke, as the FM might, and probably did, say.
During his tenure as Depute Tory leader, his patch has been put through the wringer and turned totally yellow. They don’t count SNP votes anymore in these constituencies, they weigh them. Moreover, there appears to be a bit of a move on in the party to keep Murdo out. And anyone who has ever stood for political election, either internally or externally, knows you care little about why people vote for you, you just want them to vote for you. Ms Davidson therefore will accept such anti-Murdo votes with a gracious smile.
Moreover, Ruth Davidson represents the future face of Scottish Conservatism. Too young to be tainted by Thatcher, she might finally make the break with the past and allow the Tories to turn their fortunes around. Or at least that’s the thinking. Whether or not she will manage it remains to be seen – bigger political Tory beasts than her have tried and failed.
If she becomes leader – and she will, or I’ll eat someone’s hat – the Scottish Conservatives will have the youngest party leader, be the only party in Scotland not only to have a woman at the helm but to do it twice and moreover, elect a lesbian to the position. There are so many ironies in this I don’t know where to start. Progressive Torydom. Even in the Shires. Who knew?
For these and many more reasons, hers will be a remarkable election. She’s only been an MSP for a few months. Her rise may have been stratospheric, but she has undoubted qualities. Articulate and media savvy, she will inject something different into our political discourse. Cybernats will no doubt scoff at her prospects against the First Minister every week but I wouldn’t write her off. Going toe to toe with him is bound to end in disaster, but as Annabel has shown many times in recent years, there are other ways to get attention, get your point across and importantly, get under Alex Salmond’s skin.
Ruth Davidson is probably more centred politically than many on the right would like. That will make for an interesting conversation. While the rest of Europe lurches rightwards, including our ain dear UK Parliament, Scotland will have proven definitively that it is on a quite different political course. Her election will undoubtedly make it easier for the Scottish Tories to establish clear blue water from their UK counterparts – and hopefully detoxify their brand from the government’s activities that are not finding favour with Scots voters – but we await clues to see how this might pan out in policy terms.
But the most urgent task at hand is the implementation of the Sanderson review. The party needs overhaul at every level and in every sphere, to bring it out of the 1970s and into the 21st Century. Only when it has achieved this, can it seriously begin to think about political renewal. No doubt Ruth Davidson supports the review’s recommendations but does she have the mettle to push them through?
Such activity requires an attention to detail and a knowledge of what to do and when – qualities that John Swinney demonstrated in abundance during his ill-fated SNP leadership, during which he managed to push through a centralised membership scheme and also one member, one vote in all internal elections. This was no accident: his longterm membership and service in key party roles, particularly as National Secretary, served as a useful apprenticeship to achieving such fundamental structural changes. Does Ruth Davidson have the same organisational skills to bring to the fore?
The Scottish Conservatives have no doubt spent their summer chattering amongst themselves and one hopes garnering an inkling on what the three likely candidates think about stuff. And while these are the only votes that count for now, Ruth Davidson might like to share some of her thoughts on stuff with the rest of us. It would be bizarre indeed to greet a new Tory leader without knowing her views on well, anything.
And while the prospect of such a vibrant, youthful unknown leading one of Scotland’s main parties provides a frisson of excitement, I wonder if Ruth Davidson might just be peaking too soon? The Tories are in transition and such leadership stipends rarely last long enough to reap gains from any reforms enacted or attempted. Ask the afore-mentioned John Swinney. And Wendy Alexander.
Which makes John Lamont’s decision to sit out this round of musical chairs, and instead, throw his hat (and constituency votes) behind the most likely contender to defeat his shot at the next leadership election seem very shrewd indeed.
#1 by Indy on August 20, 2011 - 9:32 am
It’s an interesting conundrum for the Tories because they must get frustrated that, despite having a popular leader like Annabelle Goldie and despite having made a very constructive contribution to the Scottish Parliament, the Tory brand is still toxic. But I don’t see what else they can do except carry on regardless and hope that they can make progress incrementally.
Ruth Davidson is undoubtably the best choice for leader in Scotland – but there is still nothing they can do to escape being tarnished by the actions of the Tories down south. I think Alex Salmond will probably be quite pleased if she wins because she’s the kind of women he gets on with, she’s bright, she knows her own mind, she can think on her feet and she has a sense of humour. I think she will probably shine in the Scottish Parliament.
In the long run the Scottish Tories simply have to find a way to break free of the UK party because that’s the only way they will ever be able to convert goodwill from the electorate into votes. It sounds paradoxical but if the Scottish Tories could do that I think they might actually be in a good position to pick up a fair chunk of the middle class Lib Dem vote.
#2 by Doug Daniel on August 20, 2011 - 11:03 am
Indy’s right, the Tories will never make any headway up here as long as they’re part of the UK party. In fact, it seems to be the story for all three unionist parties – it’s hard to see how any of them will recover anytime soon while they remain as nothing more than a branch of the UK party.
Anyway, in regards to Ms Davidson herself, I’d certainly welcome her as Tory leader. Willie Rennie hasn’t been much cop, and Labour’s next LOLITSP will likely be as bad (if not worse) than Iain Gray, so we need someone to be able to at least challenge Big Eck. Also, while her skills are far more important than her gender or sexuality, I’d rather we didn’t have an all-male cast of party leaders, and it’d make Scotland look pretty radical to have two out of five party leaders – 40% – from the LGBT community. I doubt even the Dutch or Scandanavians could boast that figure.
I could see one problem on the horizon, of course. I may be wrong, but I would imagine Tory voters are the most likely to be against gay marriage (despite Bill Walker et al doing their best to make the SNP look like the anti-gay party). Obviously, homophobic and/or overly Christian voters are not going to find any party leader speaking up against gay marriage when it comes into the arena properly, but they’re going to be more uncomfortable with a lesbian as their leader in this situation. I would not expect this to play any part in people’s thinking when voting for leader – and I would most certainly hope it doesn’t – but it may result in some uncomfortable times for the Tories. Then again, they are probably necessary for the party to evolve anyway.
But yes, let’s have the best for the job in place. Holyrood will be all the better for it.
#3 by The Burd on August 20, 2011 - 1:25 pm
Yep, the SNP’s difficulties over same sex marriage might pale into insignificance compared to the Tories – I can’t recally what Ms Davidson’s position is on it. And not sure how her centrist leanings will endear her to the right of her party either…. but I’m sure her team are addressing these kind of concerns behind the scenes. Maybe…
#4 by DougtheDug on August 20, 2011 - 11:11 am
I’ve read both the Lib-Dem constitution which allows their Scottish region to do what it wants as long as it doesn’t impinge on UK policy and I’ve read the Labour constitution which doesn’t differentiate between the Scottish region of Labour and any other Labour region in Britain but what I’ve never got my hands on is a copy of the Conservative constitution to find out just how much leeway Ruth Davidson would have as leader of the Tory’s Scottish region. Does anyone out there have an electronic copy?
To be honest despite the fact that the Lib-Dems’ Scottish region has some regional autonomy they were rightly and correctly recognised by the Scottish electorate as just another part of a unified UK Lib-Dem party and punished in the polls accordingly. I can’t see the Scottish region of the Tories being treated any differently whether under a new leader or not.
#5 by Angus McLellan on August 20, 2011 - 12:21 pm
It is curious that there’s no sign of the Scottish or UK Conservative Party having their constitution available online. It can’t be a Burn Before Reading top secret document because there’s a comment piece by a Tory activist here in the Guardian which discusses some of the clauses.
The Scottish Party are supposed to be changing their rules anyway, based on the Sanderson Review. At least we can read the review, so is that a sign of greater openness there? No, because that document doesn’t come direct from the Tory Party but is instead a copy put up by the BBC. Very strange stuff.
#6 by The Burd on August 20, 2011 - 1:22 pm
Yes you can tell i hedged around the actual voting process a bit ie don’t actually know if MSPs have double votes the way they do in Labour or if this election is by electoral college or OMOV. Would be interesting to know – let us know if you find out!
#7 by DougtheDug on August 20, 2011 - 4:11 pm
Angus,
Thanks for the link to the Sanderson report because there’s something quite interesting in it about the Conservative leadership in Scotland. I’ve skimmed through the report before but as this post is about the Conservative leadership it made me look at one section more closely.
On page 15 of the report it says, “As a result, the Scottish Conservatives currently have a UK leader, a Scottish parliamentary leader, a chairman (who is also the Party’s chief executive officer), an elected deputy chairman (who is the leader of the Party’s volunteers), as well as political leaders in the parliaments of Westminster and Brussels.” and in the conclusions on that page “The Scottish Conservatives are not alone in lacking clarity of political leadership in Scotland. The arrangements within the Scottish Labour Party are similar.” (My bold)
I’d always thought that the Conservatives had a regional structure in Scotland rather like the Lib-Dems with a genuine regional leader but it appears from the report that that is not the case. It seems that rather than Iain Gray being the odd one out of the three parliamentary leaders of the UK parties in Holyrood Willie Rennie is the odd one out because he’s the only one who is an actual regional leader.
Unless the Conservatives in Scotland rearrange their party structure Ruth Davidson is just going be the LOCITSP opposite the LOLITSP in Holyrood.
Another passing thought. If both Annabel and Iain are just LOCITSP and LOLITSP respectively doesn’t that make Willie Rennie the most powerful parliamentary leader in the Scottish Parliament after Alex Salmond? You’ve just got to laugh.
#8 by The Burd on August 20, 2011 - 1:22 pm
No neither can I Doug but they gotta try and you can see how it’s quite a good refrain for a wannabe leader.
#9 by Barbarian on August 20, 2011 - 12:56 pm
Who she? But as long as it is not Murdo Fraser I don’t mind.
#10 by The Burd on August 20, 2011 - 1:19 pm
New MSP, lesbian aged 31, elected on Glasgow list, accolyte of Annabel’s, very savvy, previously journalist, haven’t a clue what her line on anything is…. but isn’t it interesting?!
#11 by Indy on August 20, 2011 - 2:07 pm
I have seen her speak at a few things. She is very good. Wouldn’t make me think of voting Tory lol – but then I wouldn’t vote Tory unless someone was holding a gun to my head. But she is in every way a modern woman so she will appeal to a different demographic to the traditinal Tory vote.
#12 by Andra on August 20, 2011 - 1:13 pm
Maybe the Scottish Tories should be the first of the UK wide parties to break away from the UK party. They would steal a march on Labour and LibDems in adapting to the Devolved situation. A change of name might also help cast of the toxicity that plagues them.
#13 by The Burd on August 20, 2011 - 1:20 pm
These are the kind of things one surmises they might be debating internally over the leadership but who knows?
#14 by mav on August 20, 2011 - 2:23 pm
All I’ll say is that I’ll decide who I vote for after the hustings. Like a lot of others have said, I don’t know enough about Ruth Davidson. But I don’t know enough about Jackson Carlaw either. I know my opinions on Murdo Fraser, and while I don’t want to share them here I will say that the widespread press/online belief that he’s persona non grata with the Tory rank and file is pretty wide of the mark.
Still, nice to have a choice of decent candidates. Members of parties beginning with L must be jealous.
#15 by Dr William Reynolds on August 21, 2011 - 9:02 am
Doesn’t seem a great deal of interest? For what it is worth I thought Murdo Fraser was their best hope.although I know nothing of Ruth Davidson.Whatever,my personal view is that the Conservatives need achange of attitude,more than a change of leader.They need to stop viewing standing up for Scotland as picking fights with Wesminster.They need to get in line with the growing business pressure for full fiscal autonomy,and they need to promote a Scottish role and presence withing the international scene.That will do for starters but I see no sign that they are likely to that.In that case their support will continue to flat line.While they have a few pockets of support just now,two of their frst past the post seats (Ayr and Galloway & West Dumfriess,are vulnerable.
#16 by Barbarian on August 21, 2011 - 1:04 pm
Slightly off topic, but the PCS union has caused a furore over gay/lesbian awareness conference, and most of the anger has ironically come from gay/lesbian members. I’m not in the union, but colleagues have told me that the union is paying all expenses for those who wish to attend the conference. However, to attend you must be gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender. One gay person has already resigned in protest, and there are rumblings that some may take legal action as the offer discriminates against hetrosexual/asexual members.
This might explode nationally and also make the current SNP issue disappear.