It’s been a bad week for bad news.
Ninety editorial jobs going at the Daily Record and Sunday Mail is a body blow to one of Scotland’s greatest newspaper institutions and will have struck terror into the hearts of every journalist in the land.
The scale of the losses, almost halving the editorial team and diminishing the whole staff by over a third, is breathtaking: every single one represents a human tragedy for the families involved. No, they are not the first and won’t be the last people ever to lose their jobs but where are the alternatives? Finding work in a diminishing media pond in Scotland will be tough. Yet colleges and universities keep on churning out journalism and media studies graduates. Hmm.
The attempt by the Trinity Media Group to spin this as good news is contemptuous. Yes, there is an inevitability about the impact of advancing technology. Online content systems reduce the need for scribblers and editors but – and I realise I’m stating the bleedin’ obvious here – they don’t seek out the news, research a good story, create a splash. The more rationalisation in the Scottish press, the more ubiquitous and uniform copy we get as holes in pages are filled by agency releases.
I can’t help thinking – though of course I may be wide of the mark – that the Daily Record/Sunday Mail’s reduced circulation in recent years is more of an excuse rather than a cogent reason for these job losses. The problems at Trinity Media Group are much more profound. Bringing the largely standalone operation in Scotland under the Trinity wing and standardising it as a Trinity publication with shared content and features might make financial sense to the parent company but threatens to kill off Scotland’s national tabloid newspaper.
Charles McGhee opines eloquently about the impact of big proprietorial, often international businesses. His article, and indeed allmediascotland’s leader on the issue, are excellent. Others, of course, have used the bad news to have a pop, largely from their metropolitan boltholes, pointing out the many faultlines in the Scottish press environment and product.
I might even agree a little, believing firmly as I do, that the essential components of a flourishing press are to be free and fair, bold and imaginative, not thirled to the political preferences nor personal foibles of owners and editors.
But the reasons for the decline of the national newspaper in Scotland are multifarious and complex. For a whole host of reasons, people are buying fewer newspapers and that says as much about us, as a nation, as it does about the quality of the offering.
I will confess to reading the Daily Record/Sunday Mail only occasionally but I am a rare burd, being an avid newspapers and new magazine purchaser and reader.  I acknowledge and agree that there is a place in our world for tabloid newspapers and they have an existing and potential market and purpose. How dull we would be if we all had the same tastes and views: newspapers should reflect and meet all the needs and interests of a population and its society.
Moreover, bloggers co-exist with media outlets and practitioners. The media play a vital role at the heart of our communities and society, acting as the hub of a wheel that ensures information, news and comment reaches audiences. Bloggers may like to think they are the new kids on the block, bypassing the media through modern technology to reach audiences directly but frankly that is delusionary. The future might be social but our paltry viewing figures cannot hope to compete with the ability of mainstream media to reach mass audiences. In fact, those that have become celebrity bloggers owe thanks to MSM professionals for their stardom: many now have successful media careers as a result.
There is also a desperate irony behind the reason for my absence from these shores when the bad news broke. The European Parliament office in the UK has been trying for years to interest journalists to do the visit I was on and find out more about writing news stories on Parliament business. Few had the time or inclination to do so and often, the editorial line in the UK media, almost uniformly, is a negative one when it comes to European matters. The Directorate-General for Communications has turned to citizen bloggers as a way of trying to influence the news agenda, neatly pointing up some of the embedded weaknesses in our current media set-up.
Ultimately, we need a vibrant, healthy media if we want a vibrant, healthy democracy. To shine a light – as the Daily Record has done so effectively in years’ past – to expose, to praise, to promote and to defeat, to shame, to change. If anyone doubts the power and role of the media in a free society, go check out PEN and Amnesty International. Or just google *campaigns to free journalists*.
If ever there was a time to play a nationalist media card, this was it. Scotland needs a diverse media mix in rude health. It needs smaller ownership, not bigger, and more homegrown products to succeed. More powers over all media regulation – to create an enabling framework – and full fiscal powers to create a tax regime that allows the flourishing of talent and creativity, and protects the very good products that we still have. Two very recent examples include the Sunday Herald’s expose of the reach of organised crime gang culture into our lives and Scotland on Sunday’s partnership with Wikileaks. As a nation, we punch above our media weight in so many ways. But we can do more and better.
So, go on, cyber nats, do your worst. Enough gloating about the job losses – very unedifying and immature by the way. Don’t focus on the Daily Record’s current political slant as the source of all its ills – you’ll be wrong by the way – but put your invective to good use for once.
The thing about standing up for Scotland is that we stand up for all of it. And it’s time to stand up for Scotland’s press.
#1 by Holyrood patter on June 11, 2011 - 9:47 am
I find more examples of people slating the cybernats, than cybernats themselves gloating. Another example of an invented threat. The SNP’s official policy, as adopted at conference is to support trinity staff to the hilt, and I see that reflected in the ministerial response
#2 by James on June 11, 2011 - 9:52 am
Honestly, just read the comments on Newsnet Scotland if you don’t know what Kate’s talking about.
#3 by John Ruddy on June 11, 2011 - 3:25 pm
I try not to, but I can easily guess the sort of remarks being made over there. Its not nice, and shows that if you want to stand up for scotland, you have to stand up for everyone in Scotland, and not just those who support you.
#4 by Don on June 12, 2011 - 2:26 am
Perhaps you can point to specific posts gloating about the job losses. Or perhaps you can’t. From what I can read on that site, everyone agrees that the job losses are terrible but few will miss a rag that deliberately lies to its readership while masquerading as news.
#5 by The Burd on June 11, 2011 - 9:56 am
ross, you are missing/ignoring the point…. possibly deliberately?
#6 by JPJ2 on June 11, 2011 - 9:48 am
“Bringing the largely standalone operation in Scotland under the Trinity wing and standardising it as a Trinity publication with shared content and features might make financial sense to the parent company but threatens to kill off Scotland’s national tabloid newspaper”
A similar action destroyed the Scottish Daily Express in the sixties (my late father worked for them for many years). It will no doubt come as news to many that in the early sixties the Scottish Daily Express outsold the Record-and ever other paper in Scotland for that matter.
#7 by The Burd on June 11, 2011 - 9:56 am
Thanks for sharing that – aware this is not the first time this has happened.
#8 by Holyrood patter on June 11, 2011 - 10:14 am
Not at all, caught up in perhaps some of the anti jeff hysteria on twitter, any redundancies are awful in a struggling industries, I actually enjoy the record, pages 2 and 8 aside, and the loss of a Scottish perspective on Scottish and global events is a travesty
#9 by The Burd on June 11, 2011 - 10:20 am
As James commented, go read the general hysteria in newsnet scotland. I would have posted this on my ain blog but nice to have the choice of two platforms. And shouldn’t you have included page 3 in your omissions? Tsk!
#10 by Don on June 12, 2011 - 2:29 am
I’ve read the website. Have you? Perhaps you can point to some specific examples of this “general hysteria” you claim the cybernats are exibiting. Or perhaps you’ll concede your own political leanings have led you on a wee rant and a bit of hysteria of your own.
#11 by Don on June 12, 2011 - 2:51 am
Just for balance, here’s a unionist point of view:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2011/jun/09/daily-record-mediabusiness?CMP=twt_fd
Do you think that is more or less hysterical then newset scotland’s posters? Bare in mind the author of this article was paid for his work and it was published in a national newspaper.
Puts those comments on newset into context doesn’t it. It also puts your comments about cybernats and hysteria into context too. Poor showing.
#12 by The Burd on June 12, 2011 - 8:06 am
The thing I love about the *banter* on some of these comment threads is how commenters rarely actually bother to read the posts properly or click through the links in them before commenting.
#13 by Don on June 13, 2011 - 7:47 am
The same could be said about bloggers too, mind you.
#14 by Alec Macph on June 11, 2011 - 10:30 am
Holyrood Patter, dude, what are you talking about?
Now to the title post, as someone who’s been unemployed since long before the public sector and a bunch of teenagers with entitlement complexes pulled-up their collective skirts, I find it difficult to get animated about the human tragegies. A recession is where a factory closes, a depression where a newspaper closes.
Yet the point about the effectiveness of political bloggers is apposite. This medium is the modern-day equivalent of pamphleteering, and relies on journalistic expertise to provide it with much of its material.
People who spend all their Internet activities rabbiting on about obscure political events are a bit weird. Don’t get be wrong, I am sure all youse guys are great, but I wouldn’t want to date any of youse.
~alec
#15 by The Burd on June 11, 2011 - 11:06 am
Phew that’s good cos the feeling’s mutual.
#16 by Mike on June 11, 2011 - 10:35 am
I completely disagree. ‘The press’ isn’t one thing. The tabloids are – in my opinion – a force for a reactionary conservatism in this country. Aside from the sort of cosseted cronyism of the Record / Labour relationship it and others foster a mindless sleb culture, an obsession with football and just pile upon pile of disinformation.
Other forms of participatory media are and should replace them. The sooner the better.
#17 by The Burd on June 11, 2011 - 11:05 am
I don’t disagree about the current make up and focuses of tabloid journalism in this country, Mike. But I do hope for better! There is a role for reactionary conservatism in all societies. I don’t have to like it but important to acknowledge it has a right to exist as we do!
#18 by James on June 11, 2011 - 11:26 am
Also, most anti-tabloid sneering is from people who don’t read them and don’t know about them. Campaigns against loan sharking, the disproportionate imprisonment of women for non-violent offences, and this country’s failed drug laws: these are some of the things I’ve seen recently in Scotland’s tabloids.
Also, having one mass-market paper not slavering over Alex Salmond is quite a good thing for accountability.
#19 by Euan McColm on June 11, 2011 - 2:17 pm
glad you’ve been reading my column, james.
#20 by James on June 11, 2011 - 2:32 pm
Ha! On the loan sharking I was thinking about this.. from your competition.
#21 by Don on June 12, 2011 - 2:06 am
Having one mass-market paper not slavering over Alex Salmond is quite a good thing? I can point to 5 mass-market papers not slavering over Alex Salmond but salvering over Iain Gray/Scottish Labour/Ed Milliband/Balls instead. How is that any better for accountability?
#22 by Alec Macph on June 11, 2011 - 10:54 am
>> The tabloids are – in my opinion – a force for a reactionary conservatism in this country.
A sure fire way for any Party to face well-deserved obliquoy is to dismiss the masses in this way. I feel a Philip Dodd moment coming on.
~alec
#23 by The Burd on June 11, 2011 - 11:07 am
Go for it! Just play nicely….
#24 by Mike on June 11, 2011 - 11:21 am
Sure it has a right to exist – but does it have a right to dominate the news agendas in an unregulated way because it has massive resources?
No.
Should we cry a river for its demise? No.
#25 by Mike on June 11, 2011 - 11:22 am
Btw Alec – we don’t represent any party…
#26 by Alec Macph on June 11, 2011 - 11:49 am
Come on! Don’t you think this is all a bit Calvinistic. Give the working man a choice between culture or beer and circuses, he’ll go for the beer and circuses.
#27 by Alec Macph on June 11, 2011 - 11:53 am
>> Also, having one mass-market paper not slavering over Alex Salmond is quite a good thing for accountability.
A bi-cameral legislature – preferably with one appointed – would be better.
#28 by Alec Macph on June 11, 2011 - 11:55 am
>> Btw Alec – we don’t represent any party…
Party sharty, bloggers yoggers, it’s still a way to invalidate your opinion.
#29 by An Duine Gruamach on June 11, 2011 - 1:33 pm
People losing their jobs is not nice, but I can’t find it in me to believe that Scotland will now be missing out on the quality journalism, fact-based, objective/ intellectual comment, radical material that the Record provided. It just means that most of that particular paper’s dose of churnalism, objectification of women, sensationalism and celebrity “news” will be processed in London and not Glasgow.
#30 by Dan on June 11, 2011 - 5:36 pm
I work in the Scottish media and have a few friends who work for the Record in one form or another. However, I can’t disagree with John McGurk’s analysis (http://bit.ly/jWbTNC) suggesting the inevitability of it all.
The burdz side comment on Universities still providing far too many journalism degrees is in my mind a real scandal. These courses are there for the unis benefit, in providing a continual stream of optimistics students and therefore funding, irrespective of the job prospects on the other end.
#31 by The Burd on June 11, 2011 - 6:13 pm
yep it was why it was a side comment Dan, though definitely worthy of further examination. John McGurk is spot on – but there are many like him who have made a tidy income and career out of presiding over the decline in the Scottish press. They shoulder some of the blame frankly.
#32 by AliMiller on June 11, 2011 - 6:46 pm
Tabloids trivialise debate that ought to be substantial and based on sound facts. The tabloids are often right and often wrong, but rarely do they take their stance for the right reasons. They lie, they are intellectually debasing and they are a mechanism by which money infects democracy.
There rightly seems to be great concern about “accountability” and “scrutiny” of government in recent times in the Scotish Political scene, but scrutiny is not just about shouting “youre wrong!” at someone, it must be built on solid foundations of fact and consideration. These tabloids bypass substantive debate and go straight for some reactionary opinion which is based on thei political affiliations and rarely present information without major bias. As such I am not clamouring for political intervention to save what are essentially failing business models.
#33 by Tony on June 11, 2011 - 8:08 pm
>>So, go on, cyber nats, do your worst. Enough gloating about the job losses – very unedifying and immature by the way. Don’t focus on the Daily Record’s current political slant as the source of all its ills – you’ll be wrong by the way – but put your invective to good use for once.<<
Am I the only one who finds this type of patter pretty beligerant, as an SNP supporter and activist I don't appreciate being labelled or judged thus, thanks.
I for one can testify that I held my nose buying the record upto last year before the distortions, misreporting, non-reporting and outright lies, yep lies got too much for me. I would not buy the sun and a broadsheet doesn't fit too well on my lap. I can also testify that many ordinary non-political people have said to me along the lines that they gradually went off the record due to it's race to the bottom with the sun. Even though pretty much all of us who read the record or formally did, come from a natural labour supporting background, it does not mean that we all swallow the nonsense that passes for political reporting.
I do not mourn nor rejoice, but this is the inevitable consequence of treating people like mugs. Remember this is the newspaper that admitted on May 8th that it had lied to it's readership all along and they never thought Gray or labour were the right choice anyway. Despite weeks and months pumping them up and saying how great they were. I'll say this for the sun – a newspaper I detest, they treated their readership with respect and were very clear about the how's and why's of their editorial policy to eventually come out and suport the SNP. And where they drew the line with said support.
#34 by Don on June 12, 2011 - 2:14 am
Couldn’t agree more. While no one can rejoice in people losing their jobs, the record descended into blatantly lying to their readership, not once, not occassionally but on a regular basis, all to “do down” the SNP whilst bigging up Iain Gray/Ed Milliband, et al. How any newspaper can think it can lie to its readship and stay in business is beyond me. What I find amazing is that media pundits all claim that the record’s political leanings have nothing to do with its readership plummeting. They can continue to stick their heads in the sand.
However, since the result last Month, I’ve noticed that the open hostility to the SNP has significantly decreased. If that continues, it would be interesting to see the sales figures over the next 6 months. There may be light at the end of the tunnel.
#35 by Mike on June 11, 2011 - 10:25 pm
James I’ve read the Record for years, that’s why I know it’s shit.
Have you been following any of the NotW issue?
The tabloid press in this country are frankly a shambles
and a dangerous shambles.
As for your idea of the Scottish press supporting Salmond
I think this is highly dubious.
#36 by Education For All on June 12, 2011 - 1:39 am
“I acknowledge and agree that there is a place in our world for tabloid newspapers”
“Ultimately, we need a vibrant, healthy media if we want a vibrant, healthy democracy”
These statements in the article directly contradict each other. Tabloids are not “healthy media” and are an obstacle to a “vibrant, healthy democracy”.
There is no place in a FAIR and DECENT SOCIETY for tabloids like the Record or Sun. I would prefer them to be dead and cremated.
I would like citizens to be weaned off these tabloids to something more useful to their lives.
I believe there is a need for a national FREE newspaper that simply reports ‘IMPORTANT’ news truthfully and objectively. By ‘IMPORTANT’ I mean news that has an effect on citizens’ wellbeing and general knowledge and completely excludes ‘celebrities’ and whatever they get up to.
Such a free newspaper could be funded by a national charity set up for the purpose. Perhaps it could also be formatted in a way to improve adult literacy in our society.
#37 by Aonghas on June 12, 2011 - 12:52 pm
We definitely NEED more articles about INCREASED tractor production – a gap in the market exists no doubt.
I wish your enterprise the BEST of luck.
#38 by Scottish republic on June 12, 2011 - 9:00 am
The paper news is a dying medium.
Salmond is trying to help them and that’s more than The Scottish Daily News got when it was left to die.
Politically, why would a cyber nat wish to try and save a ranting and raving Brit nat tabloid that speaks to more than 350,000 Scots (family members read too) and tells them how awful they think the SNP is? Their rhetoric was quite mental during the recent Holyrood election.
‘Typical DR heading : ‘SNP blasted… SNP under fire… SNP accused’ etc.
We have a referendum on the future of our country and one less Brit nat rag is not missed.
I will add, the DR is a dull, drab, dreary, football obsessed, crime obsessed dispiriting read. Why save that even in journalistic terms.
The Sun (another Brit nat rag but ever so temporarily a little bit pro-SNP but not for long) is fun, knows it’s a tabloid comic and throws a bit of sex in. The Sun is successful and it’s the complete opposite of the Dreary Read.
Having said all that, the Scot nats all wish the DR journalists could keep their jobs but their England based bosses have decided to take those jobs down to England. The DR has fought for the union and the SNP has fought to break it. It seems, ironically, the DR is just the latest victim of the union it so treasured (journalistically speaking) and of the internet.
The internet is the silver bullet and it’s just a matter of time till there are no more news papers. Sad some say but there it is.
Newsnetscotland is positioning itself in my vew to become a player in the future and will have a loyal readership win or lose the referendum.
#39 by dcomerf on June 12, 2011 - 10:52 am
I was in Ireland last weekend: English speaking, economy in a mess and with 1 million people less than Scotland; you’d have thought its print media diversity would be lower than Scotland’s and with tonnes of titles shipped in from London? Funnily enough this wasn’t the case. Read the Sunday Times when I was there expecting a British newspaper – its content was almost completely Irish, much more indigenous than the Scottish edition ever had been.
Hope some current and ex Mail/Record employees see that there may be employment benefits to Independence.
#40 by douglas clark on June 12, 2011 - 11:02 am
Whilst I don’t read tabloids, I think Education for All is being far too prescriptive. Indeed, if I wanted Pravda, I’d go back in time. The desire to paint everything as rosy is something governments find very hard to resist….
#41 by Hamish on June 12, 2011 - 9:07 pm
Eloquent and trenchant article The Burd.
But why do you hide behind a pseudonym?
I used to think you were Subrosa, but then I used to think Subrosa was Dorothy Grace-Elder.
Then I thought I had you sussed as Anne MacWhatsit who is about to stand for the SNP in Inverclyde.
But James has let slip that your first name might be Kate.
Have you taken out a super-injunction to conceal your identity? I don’t have you down as Ryan Giggs’ type, but maybe you are Fred Goodwin’s, who knows. Why so coy?
#42 by Derrick on June 12, 2011 - 10:48 pm
Stop being so preposterous and try Twitter, you old goat :p)
#43 by Malc on June 13, 2011 - 10:07 am
Its hardly a pseudonym when Kate’s short biography appears on our contributors page…
#44 by Hamish on June 16, 2011 - 12:17 pm
Belated but abject apologies Malc (and Kate if I may be so familiar).
I followed the link to The Burdz blog, but missed the obvious link here on this blog.
There’s an expression that Homer (Simpson) uses for such occasions, but I think it has too many syllables for me.
#45 by The Burd on June 16, 2011 - 9:43 pm
No worries Hamish – I had meant to come back and explain the coyness. None really – a vain and failed attempt at a pseudonym but I’m not good at keeping secrets! I was outed early days but now I think the Burd moniker has kind of stuck!
#46 by Aidan Skinner on June 12, 2011 - 9:26 pm
What fiscal powers would you use to help the media?
#47 by James on June 13, 2011 - 8:07 am
Borrowing, the magic wand we’ve all learnt fixes all economic problems?
#48 by Mike on June 13, 2011 - 8:03 am
‘I used to think you were SubRosa’. Oh god. Poor Kate.
#49 by Scottish republic on June 13, 2011 - 2:50 pm
We need more than ‘borrowing’ to make Scotland more than it is.
We need Full Fiscal Autonomy.
In a way that’s playing hard ball to hit but it’s only fair and will allow English tax-payers to feel less disgruntled and us to create a vibrance in the Scottish economy I’ve never yet known.
#50 by Indy on June 13, 2011 - 3:10 pm
I think the idea that people buy newspapers because of their political leanings is rubbish really. Clearly most of the Daily Record’s readers (who voted) voted SNP just as most of the readers of every other paper did. So while it is trued that some of the Record’s eelction coverage was laughably biased it made no difference to the outcome of the election and it is certainly not the reason why it has lost readers.
If people are looking for a reason for that maybe start by looking at really obvious things like the Metro. Why bother buying a paper to read on the bus to work when you can pick one up for nothing that probably has the same standard of news coverage plus lifestyle/celeb pages, a telly page and a much more entertaining letters page? That’s what people buy papers like the Record for, that and the football coverage. And the less said about the Daily Record’s football coverage the better.
#51 by Scottish republic on June 13, 2011 - 5:07 pm
Their ludicrous reporting against the SNP didn’t help but the DR was an awful, depressing load to bear. A terrible snoozepaper.
The internet is killing paper news and the DR is the latest victim. It’ll soon be the Scotsman/Herald.
However, the DR is completely doomed unless it’s bought over and done over because now it’s based in England with regional stuff thrown in. Who would buy over the DR when the Sun has the market and is taking more?
#52 by Observer on June 13, 2011 - 8:41 pm
I agree with Indy the metro rules! Whereas before the kitchens at work might be strewn with discarded Daily Records now there are discarded metros.
If the tabloids want to re-connect with their market they could do worse than look at that. It punches all the right buttons to last a bus journey to work & it’s entertaining which is what people want in a bubblegum newspaper.
The Record is boring.
#53 by Indy on June 14, 2011 - 10:23 am
The other point I forgot to make about the Daily Record is the one Scottish Republic made about the crime obsession. That is a really serious fault. It’s not just about the way they report crime, it’s about the way they talk about gangsters or “cime bosses” as they call them- they have even had “exclusive” interviews with some of these characters! I am sure that this is part of the reason that circulation has fallen as many people are just disgusetd with that kind of approach so if there is anyone from the Daily Record reading take note.