One of the first few difficult decisions that new Presiding Officer Tricia Marwick will have to make is who gets to quiz the First Minister at Question Time, how many questions will they get and how regularly will they be asked.
Given the SNP enjoys a majority in the Parliament, there is an even greater incentive for Salmond to duck and dodge answering questions. A ‘you can’t do anything about it anyway’ mentality could easily seep in over the next five years so a strong opposition with ample time to press the Government is as important as ever. It was relatively easier for the SNP to take umbrage with opposition parties on policies from Local Income Tax to Minimum Pricing because the onus was as much on Labour, Tories, Greens and Lib Dems to get involved as it was on the SNP to deliver on its promises. Not any more, and that means opposition parties have more of a right to be righteous.
Labour and the Conservatives will no doubt take first and second spots in the questioning stakes, possibly even with an extra question each.
It is difficult to quantify to what extent FMQs defined Gray and Goldie’s tenures as leader but it could be a useful springboard into the public arena for either (or both) of their replacements.
The Liberal Democrats, to reflect their shrunken size, will no doubt be entitled to a couple of questions every other week. A frustrating demotion for the party but it may lead to more targeted and more effective questioning as the party seeks to find a foothold in the electorate’s hearts. It does seem that Willie Rennie is going to opt for the Mr Angry mould of opposition that didn’t serve Gray or Scott terribly well. We shall se if that changes in the chamber at Question Time.
There is an argument that as the Greens are the only Opposition party not to lose any seats then Patrick Harvie should not suffer a reduced profile at FMQs, and perhaps even increase it given the overall shrinkage for other opposition parties. Realistically this won’t happen and it’ll be business as usual for the Greens. The battle for relevance, within or outwith FMQs, will be even more challenging now that the party’s 2 MSPs do not hold the balance of power.
The main problem of course is the content. We have had ‘hamster wars’ between McLeish and Swinney and last term was more than a little bit panto. Adding a touch of theatre to proceedings is welcome of course but whoever asks however many questions in whatever order over the next five years, they will do well to have learned from the election that a constructive, positive, logical line of questioning is key.
And there’s no Lord Foulkes any more so at least they should be a little bit quieter…
#1 by Douglas McLellan on May 26, 2011 - 10:14 am
I think the new rules have been announced already:
Question one – Labour leader (with four supplementary questions).
Question two – Tory leader (with two supplementary questions).
Question three – Lib Dem leader (two weeks out of three) and “best” backbench question one week out of three.
Question four – SNP.
Question five – Labour.
Question six – Tories, SNP or Green.
Intention to take local issues after question two.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-13549277
#2 by Jeff on May 26, 2011 - 10:25 am
Interesting. Thanks for that Douglas.
It seems getting onto the Corporate Body is the critical factor.
Lib Dems (5 MSPs): will get to ask the third question for two weeks out of three.
Greens (2 MSPs): question 6 – from time-to-time on a roughly proportional basis
Doesn’t seem entirely fair to me. Maybe the PO felt sorry for fellow Fifer Willie Rennie’s plight…
#3 by Douglas McLellan on May 26, 2011 - 10:31 am
It doesnt seem fair. I would have at least given them the question on the non-Lib Dem week.
#4 by Jeff on May 26, 2011 - 10:38 am
I smell a petition in the air….. 😉
(just joking)
#5 by James on May 26, 2011 - 10:49 am
The Lib Dems with 5 MSPs are getting more access (two weeks in three) than Greens got when we had 7 MSPs (one week in two).
And, now, if they get 10 slots every 15 weeks, then (proportionally to them) we should get 4 slots every 15 weeks. We shall see.
#6 by Caron on May 26, 2011 - 2:55 pm
I would rather we got 2 questions on the 2 weeks out of the 3 and the Greens and Margo shared the third – and also got 2 questions. It’s much better to pursue something if you have a supplementary.
I don’t think that this way of doing things is going to help with the yah boo shouty pantomime nonsense. It’s perfectly possible for Lab and SNP to take up 15-20 minutes doing that with 5 questions.
The other thing is that the best backbench question issue is quite subjective. Is that a risky tactic from the new PO.
We’ll have to see how this works in practice and whether Tricia is willing to cut Salmond down to size.
#7 by Bill Pickford on May 26, 2011 - 7:45 pm
It seems, going by the replies to the First Minister today, that the Unionist Alliance are simply carrying on from last session.
More of the same was the order of the day, with Zombie Gray (dead man walking) snarling, Zombie Goldie (dead dame walking) using sarcasm instead of wit and Willy Wipe-out bigging himself up with faux anger.
These gombeens all have geggs like Marty Feldman, with half an eye viewing Holyrood but with most of their attention focused on their masters in London.
They have no vision for Scotland, and for all the good they’re doing – and have done – they may as well pack it in.
They should all just eff off.
#8 by Bill Pickford on May 26, 2011 - 10:00 pm
By the way, well done Joan McAlpine and especially Chic Brodie, who gave far and away the best of the ‘maiden’ speeches.
#9 by Brian Nicholson on May 27, 2011 - 2:18 am
Surely in the spirit of enlighted democracy with an active opposition, it would make more sense to do the following
Question one – Labour leader (with three supplementary questions).
Question two – Tory leader (with two supplementary questions).
Question three – Lib Dem leader (with one supplimentary question)
Question four – |green leader (no supplementary question)
Question five – Margo
Further questions as directed by Presiding Officer following a party rotation as follows
SNP x 2, Labour, Conservative, LibDem, Green.
FMQ should recognize that there are five political parties and one independent and all should be recognized each week.
#10 by Alex Buchan on May 27, 2011 - 6:15 pm
I remember Jack MacConnel had some ideas for improving the way Holyrood works. He wanted to see it being able to be more like Westminster in having the structures to have ministers come before parliament to give statements on current issues of concern so that Holyrood because more of a focus for the nations concerns and was more able to respond to events. Would this kind of thing also be decided by the PO or is there a committee that looks into these things?
#11 by Angus McLellan on May 27, 2011 - 8:17 pm
“More like Westminster”? See also “death, kiss of”.
But it’s certainly a good idea in principle – who can object to there being more ministerial accountability? – although there are other parliaments in the world. How this problem is addressed in countries of a similar size with unicameral legislatures – Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and Ireland too if the Seanad is abolished – is probably more relevant than British experience. I’ve no answers, but perhaps someone better informed will be along shortly.
#12 by BM on May 29, 2011 - 2:14 pm
Norway has a ‘General Question Time’, where questions can be put to the appropriate minister, just like ‘General Question Time’ in the Scottish Parliament.