As ever at Better Nation, we like to be ahead of the curve. Â (What do you mean we never lead and always follow?! Â What do you mean our predictions were ridiculously poor for the election?!! Â Show us someone who had an SNP majority!)
Anyway, maybe we’re jumping the gun a little (especially since there’s no PO in place yet) but we’ve started casting our thoughts to the personnel who might make up Scotland’s first single-party majority Cabinet. Â Malc up first here, and I think that consistency will be key. Â I doubt that we’ll see many (if any) changes to the major players in the Cabinet, though we may see some changes at Ministerial level. Â Indeed, we’ll definitely have one, since Jim Mather retired. Â I think also that Alex Salmond might take the opportunity to slightly change his ministerial portfolios – just marginally. Â That said, I hadn’t considered some of this until a post-election email from a councillor friend, so I’m kind of going along with his idea here.
So – here’s what I think the Cabinet will look like:
First Minister – Alex Salmond
Deputy FM & Health Secretary – Nicola Sturgeon
Finance Secretary – John Swinney
Education Secretary – Mike Russell
Justice Secretary -Â Kenny MacAskill
Rural Affairs & Environment Secretary – Richard Lochhead
Sub-Cabinet level:
Office of FM:
Minister for Parliamentary Business – Bruce Crawford
Minister for Europe & External Affairs – Aileen McLeod
Minister for Constitution & Culture – Â Alex Neil
Health:
Minister for Public Health – Shona Robison
Minister for Housing, Communities & Sport – Michael Matheson
Finance:
Minister for Enterprise – Joe FitzPatrick
Minister for Transport – Keith Brown
Minister for Local Government – Â Derek MacKay
Education:
Minister for Children & Early Years – Adam Ingram
Minister for Schools & Skills – Angela Constance
Minister for Universities, Colleges & Apprenticeships – Fiona Hyslop
Justice:
Minister for Community Safety – Fergus Ewing
Rural Affairs/ Environment:
Minister for the Environment & Climate Change – Linda Fabiani
I’ve gone for a few new job titles which may not happen. Â I think the Constitution brief might stay separate from Europe etc, and I think the SNP will want a “big hitter” in the brief. Â I’m not sure Salmond would trust Alex Neil not to be too… fundamentalist(!) with the job, but he’s the guy I’d expect in the role (assuming Mike Russell stays on in the Cabinet). Â I’ve added Sport to Housing & Communities since there are issues with funding and reconstruction, particularly in football and rugby which will probably be political issues as well. Â I’ve also added the role of Minister for Local Government because with a “permanent” Council Tax freeze (well, for five years), we’re looking at a relationship between councils and Holyrood which might need a proper go-between at ministerial level. Â Finally, I’ve also added a Minister for “tertiary education”, including apprenticeships – which will help to show both commitment to job creation (a key Labour concern in the election) and university funding (likely to be a key issue in the next five years).
As to the personnel. Â Couple of caveats. Â I’m expecting Roseanna Cunningham to be in line for one of the PO jobs – whether it is PO or one of the DPO slots will depend on who other candidates are/ how much the SNP want the job I suspect – but if she isn’t elected there, I suspect she’ll be named back in her Environment brief from the previous session, with Linda Fabiani back on the back benches. Â There are a couple of new faces in parliament straight into my ministerial team – but consider them more and they make a bit of sense. Â Aileen McLeod has a PhD in Europe – she knows it inside out – and she’s worked in the European Parliament as well, and you want someone in the Europe brief who understands it. Â Equally, Derek MacKay at Local Government. Â He was the youngest council leader in Scotland for a time – and ran his council effectively. Â He’ll have contacts at COSLA and relationships with councillors across Scotland – something required for the role.
I’ve also promoted a few names from the backbenches as well.  Michael Matheson is, for me, long overdue a position in the ministerial team, so he’d be my choice at Housing, Communities and Sport.  He has a background in being spokesperson for sport so I think that fits.  Joe FitzPatrick is another I was impressed with last term, and he spent a spell as Parliamentary Liaison for John Swinney, so I think a job in his department fits.  There are also a couple of other names I considered – and I think are also due promotion – Alasdair Allan, Jamie Hepburn and Aileen Campbell would be shouts here I think, but there are only so many jobs.  I suspect Brian Adam (former Chief Whip) and Tricia Marwick (formerly SNP presence on SPCB) will get Committee Convenorships, as perhaps will Stewart Maxwell and Dave Thompson.
So there we go – my “team for Scotland”. Â What do we think? Â Given how right my election predictions were, I can’t possibly be wrong… can I?!
#1 by TS on May 9, 2011 - 3:33 pm
It seems about time that Alasdair Allan gets a shot at a ministerial role…if he wants it of course! Any thoughts on what role that would be if it was offered?
#2 by Malc on May 9, 2011 - 5:38 pm
I’d say something in education possibly, or maybe the culture job – if it is decoupled from the constitution and put somewhere else. Alternatively they could make a “non-ministerial policy officer” type position to get him involved, perhaps on Gaelic language? I don’t know. I’d like to see him up there as well.
#3 by TS on May 9, 2011 - 6:56 pm
Culture would seem like a good fit…after all he isn’t just qualified on Gaelic policy but also Scots (member of the Scots language working group last term and has a PhD in Scots Language). Not that I am expecting much demand for language policy changes…but he does have the expertise.
#4 by Malc on May 9, 2011 - 7:18 pm
I agree.
#5 by CR on May 9, 2011 - 4:00 pm
According to the evening times, Christine Grahame has put her hat in the ring for PO…
#6 by Danny1995 on May 9, 2011 - 4:19 pm
I’ll be pleased if Matheson gets a gig, he’s my MSP and by all accounts a decent bloke.
#7 by TS on May 9, 2011 - 5:16 pm
Having met him myself, I would have to agree. Great guy. I am sure he will do well if he is called upon.
#8 by Malc on May 9, 2011 - 5:36 pm
I’ve been impressed with him for some time, and was surprised he wasn’t utilised more last term.
#9 by Andrew on May 9, 2011 - 4:23 pm
It’s amazing how many good candidates there are–imagine SLAB’s dilemma in trying to match them.
Was quite impressed with Fiona Hyslop during the BBC election coverage, but “Universities”? A hot potato in this term. Will she cope?
I assume you have added to the present “Ministers” list so watch out for lecture from Taxpayers Alliance, who were strangely silent over Council Tax freeze.
#10 by Malc on May 9, 2011 - 5:35 pm
Well maybe. I’ve added 3 positions true – but it makes a team of 19, which I think is still smaller than previous teams (though not from the SNP’s last term).
#11 by Daniel J on May 9, 2011 - 5:06 pm
All I can say is please please please don’t let Fiona Hyslop near Universities again..
#12 by Aidan Skinner on May 9, 2011 - 5:29 pm
This. She’s surely done enough damage already.
#13 by Malc on May 9, 2011 - 5:35 pm
Perhaps my fictional “universities” position isn’t for her. But she does have experience at Education, and it was more the class sizes thing that did for her, so I’d say if they do make the position, she might be back there.
#14 by AliMiller on May 9, 2011 - 5:37 pm
Agreed, need someone without the baggage.
#15 by Malc on May 9, 2011 - 5:40 pm
Can I clarify in saying the following: its perhaps unlikely that they make the position – but I do expect Fiona Hyslop to be back in a ministerial office.
#16 by Daniel J on May 9, 2011 - 7:59 pm
I thought her being moved to Culture etc last term was seen as her being shuffled down/to the periphery?
#17 by Mary on May 9, 2011 - 5:29 pm
Your thinking about a ministerial job in Local Government is very sound. Derek Mackay did an impressive job during his term as SNP Group Leader in CoSLA, helping to deliver agreement on the Concordat throughout the last parliament. He would be a very obvious and sensible choice for such a post.
#18 by Malc on May 9, 2011 - 5:33 pm
I can’t take full credit for the idea. A councillor friend suggested it to me, and I thought it sounded like a smart move. So its his thinking – but I totally agree with it.
#19 by AliMiller on May 9, 2011 - 5:44 pm
Someone a bit more tactful for the Constitutional Post I reckon. I would like to see Neil take over the enterprise role however, he has a strong background from the financial sector and would be far better than Fitzpatrick who although a good man is a councillor by backround. Scottish Buisiness like having one of there own in Mather, he spoke their language and knew what they were about because of his experience. They should look to someone with enough business accumen to provide the same.
#20 by Malc on May 9, 2011 - 6:27 pm
That’s a fair comment. So if we put Alex Neil into Enterprise, who takes on the constitution? Could give it to Fiona Hyslop, and give Joe FitzPatrick my mythical university post?
#21 by An Duine Gruamach on May 9, 2011 - 7:14 pm
Roseanna Cunningham for Constitution? :p
#22 by Malc on May 9, 2011 - 7:19 pm
Maybe – though if she isn’t in PO’s office as either PO or DPO, I’d imagine Salmond might keep her at Environment to minimise changes…
#23 by Alexander Belic on May 9, 2011 - 5:49 pm
The SNP manifesto said that the DFM will now be Minister for cities, I don’t know if that’ll be shared with the Health brief.
#24 by Malc on May 9, 2011 - 6:27 pm
I don’t even know what that means.
#25 by AliMiller on May 9, 2011 - 5:52 pm
I would like to see Paul Wheelhouse get a lot of involement on the financail side of things. A very strong background in economics.
#26 by Malc on May 9, 2011 - 6:28 pm
I don’t know him that well – but I agree, if there are experts in a particular field, they should be utilised (see Aileen McLeod and Derek MacKay comments).
#27 by Dubbieside on May 9, 2011 - 7:24 pm
Malc
I think from the comments on here it is obvious that the SNP has a very deep talent pool.
Bet it takes much longer to come up with the shadow posts.
#28 by Una on May 9, 2011 - 7:54 pm
I can’t see Roseanna wanting to take on the PO job really, especially with the referendum coming up. And I think Alex Neil, fine Minister though he is, is not the best face to front up the constitution question. I’d like to see a woman take that one. But there is heaps of talent to choose from, which is great.
#29 by Doug Daniel on May 9, 2011 - 9:19 pm
I agree with your cabinet, Malc,for two reasons. Firstly, having fought on a campaign of “record, team, vision”, it would be strange to then suddenly change the main team. Secondly – and more importantly – the current cabinet are arguably the six strongest MSPs in Holyrood. In fact, it’s hard to see how any of them will ever be moved from their posts, unless just to swap them around a bit. I can’t imagine any of them being demoted.
Swinney seems like he was born to be Finance Minister, and as James has mentioned numerous times, has respect across the whole parliament. Nicola has been excellent in Health, and for some reason it just seems right having a woman in charge of that portfolio. Kenny really made a name for himself with how he dealt with the Megrahi business, and it’s excellent having someone with a law background in the job. Russell is one of the very top talents in Holyrood, and he’s going to be very important over the next five years. Then there’s Richard Lochhead, who may not be a headline grabber, but who has the respect of those in his area of work, particularly the fishing industry – which is extremely important.
And of course, let’s not forget Bruce Crawford, who by all accounts was one of the most important men in the government.
So yeah, it’s hard to see many changes happening, even for the more junior posts. Aileen McLeod is definitely a good shout, as is Derek MacKay, if such a post is created. This is how governments should be – giving posts to people with experience in the field. I’d quite like to see Kenny Gibson given a post. Maybe John Mason too – his victory seemed to sum up the election for me.
Alex Neil in charge of the constitution though… Not sure about that one, unless he’s no longer part of the “fundamentalist” wing.
#30 by Gaz on May 9, 2011 - 10:14 pm
One of the major considerations of course is to keep the peace. On that basis, I can’t see how any of the current portfolio holders could be supplanted by a newly elected MSP.
It is standard practice to be part of the whip’s team or to be a liaision officer for one of the cabinet before a ministerial appointment is made.
I certainly wouldn’t rule out the cabinet and minsterial team being expanded by, say, 2 and 4 to spread the load a bit though. In such circumstances, it would be intriguing to speculate who might be in line for promotion to the cabinet.
I’d expect Stewart Stevenson to be offered a role – perhaps some or all of Jim Mather’s old job.
#31 by Malc on May 9, 2011 - 10:21 pm
I do agree Gaz – it is “standard practice” true… but there are exceptions. If they are the best people for the job, I don’t think you should overlook the new intake. But yes – it would have to be an exceptional fit.
#32 by Calum MacLeod on May 9, 2011 - 10:33 pm
Most of the ministerial roles will pick themselves but whoever is put in charge of the constitution will be the most interesting pick.
I cant see either Alex Neil or Roseanna Cunningham being given responsibility for the constitution. I agree that it needs to be a big hitter however, but someone who ultimately agrees with Salmond.
That rules out Neil because he is a fundamentalist and Cunningham because she would not be able to keep a lid on her republican tendencies, which Salmond sees at the very least as a distraction.
Lochead, MacAskill, Sturgeon all have very natural briefs.
I think Salmond would need to have some control on the brief, but I would not be that surprised to see Michael Russell moved to be in control on a referendum with someone like Neil moved to Education. Salmond originally envisaged Russell for the role, and russells views are relatively in line with Salmonds.
Otherwise, it think it will be Hyslop, with Salmond keeping very tight reins on the brief.
#33 by Eilidh on May 9, 2011 - 11:11 pm
Is there a sort of inferred hierarchy to the cabinet posts? For example, does health trump education? I think Nicola’s been excellent in health but she’s done it for a while. I tend to agree with the stability and “if it aint broke” argument but I wouldn’t mind seeing her tackling something new. I’m sure she’s more than capable. Education springs to mind because it was arguably one of SNPs weakest areas last term. But would this be seen as a step down?
just as an aside, i have to disagree with your comment doug. I don’t think any position is more suited to one gender or another, but obviously a lot of people do. I think that’s a shame.
#34 by Malc on May 10, 2011 - 8:46 am
I’m not sure about hierarchy. I’d say there’d be FM then DFM, and then perhaps Finance. But after that – Health, Education, Justice would probably all be roughly equal. And move between the three would be sideways I reckon.
As for Nicola Sturgeon – I suspect at some point during the term we’ll see her shift role from Health into one of the other briefs, probably Education or perhaps Justice. Just to give her a handle on more than one area before she steps up to the FM’s job when Eck steps down.
#35 by Gryff on May 10, 2011 - 8:57 pm
There is no inherent hierarchy, but the profile of the economic and health portfolios are just higher than the others. Interesting to look at the number of letters/PQs to different ministers, or the number of column inches they generate.
From an electoral point of view people are more likely to give their votes on these issues, thus the emphasis in the election on either jobs, or for instance, cancer treatment/drugs. (also perhaps the reason the LDs police force focus was misjudged.
#36 by douglas clark on May 9, 2011 - 11:38 pm
Thanks for that. Are we assuming, or is it the case even, that whoever holds the Constitution brief also holds the referendum brief?
If that is the case then it is the most politically important portfolio going. I think it should go to Nicola Sturgeon.
Any thought?
#37 by Malc on May 10, 2011 - 8:48 am
I’d say for sure the Constitution brief would handle the referendum. But it would also be necessary at the moment to look at the Scotland Bill and its scope.
They won’t shift Nicola out of a Cabinet role into a non-Cabinet role, so that’s a no go. For the same reason, I don’t think Mike Russell gets this gig either – hence my thinking that it might be Alex Neil. I know he disagrees with Salmond on some things, but the referendum would be big for him. I think he’d do well there.
#38 by Mike on May 10, 2011 - 1:51 am
With the referendum scheduled for the latter half of this term, the SNP really need to start the process asap of informing the nation about how Independence will work and what the benefits will be. Allied to this they will have to formulate a strategy to combat anti Independence spin from the media, especially the BBC.
Therefore, how about Joan McAlpine as Minister for Communications & Media Affairs.
#39 by James on May 10, 2011 - 7:36 am
Are you serious about both role and nominee?
#40 by Malc on May 10, 2011 - 8:51 am
I imagine they might cook up a role like this, but it won’t be a Ministerial position – at least, not in my head. It’d be seen as partisan. Suspect an MSP Communications Co-ordinator or something to that effect might work.
#41 by Quinie frae Angus on May 10, 2011 - 7:58 am
All very interesting points above. Agree that Joan McAlpine should be put in charge of Media and Communication – not only has her blog shown she has her finger on the pulse of where the “public” is at, but she has in-depth knowledge and understanding of how the press and the BBC operate. This will be crucial in order to minimse the effects of the largely pro-unionist onslaught, both subtle and not-so-subtle, which will be employed by the MSM to try to affect the electorate’s views on the referendum.
#42 by Malc on May 10, 2011 - 8:52 am
As I said before – can’t see it as a Ministerial role. But she has effectively been part of the media and communications team for several months now, so I do imagine she’ll be part of it from next week on.
#43 by Christian Schmidt on May 10, 2011 - 10:24 am
Hmmm, If I’d be Alex I’d make sure there is at least a second woman in the Cabinet – and you cannot argue that there are not enough good enough candidates. This could be easiest done by making one of the ministers formally a secretary.
If he doesn’t he is offering his opponents a chance to challenge him on equal rites repeatedly. The Greens surely would now that they are 1+1, and should Labour end up with a more gender balance front bench (or a female leader), then so would they.
#44 by Malc on May 10, 2011 - 10:30 am
I don’t disagree that they would benefit from that… but the party campaigned on the idea that “this is the team to take Scotland forward”. Which makes me think there will be limited changes to the Cabinet. Bumping a minister up a pay grade… hmmm. I’m not sure that’ll work. He’ll want to keep the core Cabinet a small team. I’m not sure the way around this. I agree – more women would be better. But who are you going to change?
Pingback: The (actual) new Scottish Government « Better Nation