Wee guest post today from Kirsty Boyle, who worked as a Scottish Parliamentary Researcher for a couple of MSPs during the last Holyrood session. Â It reviews the BBC documentary aired on Sunday 15 May which saw Michael Portillo follow Alex Salmond around the country on the campaign trail.
Airing just over a week after the SNP won a landslide Scottish election and a few days before Alex Salmond is sworn in as First Minister for a second term; Michael Portillo’s documentary on the man himself comes at a timely interlude in the SNP’s history.  With the next five year term of the Scottish Parliament undoubtedly being dominated by talk, debate and judgement on an independence referendum the SNP know it is Salmond who will see the ensuing legislation proceed through Parliament. The Scottish electorate have voted for the man, but how is he seen through the eyes of an ex-Tory MP?
Portillo makes no secret of the fact from the outset that he viewed making this documentary as recording Salmond’s political obituary. That he started the process sure Salmond would not see a second term in office in Holyrood. How wrong he was and how he appeared to change in his opinion of Alex Salmond during the course of the documentary.
Charting Salmond’s rise, fall, suspension, rise, fall and rise again in the SNP, Portillo examined the personality behind the persona. At different points Jim Sillars, Margo MacDonald and Michael Russell all allude to the adage; “That’s just the way Alex is.â€Â Something there is no doubting for the people of Glasgow Southside when we see him meeting them. Just the way he is. Which it appears is enthusiastic and infectious, even prompting Portillo to admit he felt like campaigning when witnessing Salmond in action.
We can tell, however, that Portillo wants to go further. He wants to probe Salmond about his family by remarking how Salmond is known for keeping his private live separate from his political life. Salmond answers in his trademark fashion of turning it round to talking about Scottish tradition, how Scots are very often private people yet are naturally friendly people. Incidentally he also says such public displays of personality cannot be forced and must be genuine.
After following Salmond’s career from his student days to his suspension from the SNP and his ultimate rise to lead the party again, Portillo spends much of the latter part of the documentary on the 2007 Scottish Parliament election result and what it meant for the SNP and Salmond in particular. He speaks to an uncomfortable and scathing Alistair Darling, who insists the banking crises came from Edinburgh and that the SNP’s energy policy is unworkable. Annabel Goldie MSP makes an appearance describing the way in which Salmond conducts himself in the chamber as; “good at shouting.â€
However, it is Portillo’s own analysis of Salmond’s character that surprises during this documentary. By the end of the hour we are left feeling Portillo has a clear admiration for Salmond and the way in which he has led his party to become credible and acceptable in an ultimately fragile world of politics. By the time it gets to election night Portillo is almost, almost, willing the SNP to win and although incredulous at the level of victory clearly admires the way in which it was done and the extent to which Salmond is backed by party members and now, it seems, by Scotland.
Salmond is portrayed as a man sure of himself, his country and his ability to govern as well as a gambler and a “marmite†personality – you either love him or loathe him. Despite claiming student politicians are pretty weird Portillo redeems himself slightly when he and Salmond have an open and frank discussion on past foibles in Salmond’s home town of Linlithgow. The conclusion of the documentary sees Portillo return to the scene of his childhood holidays in Kirkcaldy, somewhat reminiscent of an episode of Who Do You Think You Are? But it is here, in his Mother’s home town and the seat of the SNP’s triumphant majority win that Portillo sums up his own position on the SNP winning an independence referendum; “One thing is certain. You don’t often make money betting against Alex Salmond.â€
#1 by EphemeralDeception on May 16, 2011 - 6:59 pm
I hope I am wrong but this BBC documentary seems to be an AS / SNP for Dummies, examined from an anglocentric viewpoint and essentially oriented for an anglo-UK audience.
On the bright side maybe we will get another look at the depressed faces of the BBC Scotland election night team headed by S. Magnuson as SNP gain, after SNP gain, after LD lost deposit sank in. 🙂
#2 by douglas clark on May 16, 2011 - 8:05 pm
I dunno. At the end, Michael Portillo looked quite pleased that Salmond had won. As the guest blogger says:
Perhaps it wasn’t complete magnanimity but it didn’t seem completely unfriendly. Given that he appeared to get little or no access to Mr Salmond, I thought he made an interesting fist of it.
#3 by douglas clark on May 16, 2011 - 8:08 pm
Dear moderator,
Why am I still being moderated? Or is this normal? I signed all the forms and I really am not bad person. Have I done something wrong?
#4 by cynicalHighlander on May 16, 2011 - 10:02 pm
Seems that some are more equal than others.
#5 by Jeff on May 16, 2011 - 10:14 pm
Yeah, I have no idea how that works. Appreciate it’s frustrating though if it’s not working for some reason. I think it’s a great idea but I don’t know how it was set up to be honest.
I’ll have a look just now.
#6 by Malc on May 16, 2011 - 10:38 pm
Teething trouble with the moderating system. Bear with us!
#7 by Doug Daniel on May 16, 2011 - 10:42 pm
Are you remembering to log in every time you visit the site? I’ve forgotten a couple of times, only realising once I’ve posted something and see the dreaded “awaiting approval” message beside the comment.
#8 by Brian Nicholson on May 16, 2011 - 8:08 pm
U was left with the distinct impression of watching a travelogue. Portillo presented a few pictorials and a short history but little of substance. When your documentary spends more time showing Portillo and massaging his ego than it does on its subject, it doesn’t pass muster.
It would have been better named
Portillo on what Portillo thinks of Salmond.
#9 by Bill Pickford on May 16, 2011 - 8:43 pm
I’ve just watched a recording of this documentary and I admit I was astounded at how fair Mr Portillo was (he obviously won’t get any work from Beeb Scotticus with an attitude like that).
While he does make it plain he is still very much Thatcher’s man, he didn’t display the naked hostility towards Mr Salmond and the SNP that is Labour’s default position.
Catch this on IPlayer it’s worth a watch.
#10 by Gary on May 16, 2011 - 8:45 pm
As a member of the FSN (though not one of the people shown in the documentary), I do have to take issue with the section of the documentary where he follows round some student/youth activists and describes them first off as “student politicians” and secondly as “weird”.
I think what the likes of Portillo fail to appreciate is that, for most SNP activists my age, being part of the SNP isn’t a career move in the way that it is for other parties, but is rather an expression of our desire to see our nation stand on its own two feet politically and economically. Calling such passion and drive for a vision that extends far beyond our lifetime “weird” is, quite frankly, insulting in a way.
I’m not denying that there are probably some younger members of the Party who have an eye on the reins of power in the distant future; however, I’d like to think that, in the SNP’s case, this is the minority rather than the majority, and that our main focus is not on selfishly retaining power but advancing our country.
#11 by Gryff on May 17, 2011 - 9:03 am
As a former student politician I can advise you that all strudent activists think:
And nonetheless, they are (we were) still weird.
#12 by oldchap on May 17, 2011 - 9:19 am
I was quite impressed with the documentary too. Maybe a little light on detail in places but as the target audience is meant to be fairly wide that’s to be expected. It’s great to see mutual respect between politicians of completely different viewpoints too 🙂 It’s a shame we don’t see more of that.
On the student politics comment – as someone who did get involved in their student union I thought it was a pretty fair thing to say. We were wierd, that’s one of the reasons 95% (probably more) of students were completely uninterested in our picky debates over things like tweaking the union constitution.
#13 by Indy on May 17, 2011 - 10:04 am
I concur that young people who get so closely involved in politics are pretty weird. And we stay weird.
#14 by Gary on May 17, 2011 - 2:15 pm
I don’t see how it’s any weirder than any other interest people have though. It’s probably just a personal thing more than anything else, but for a sizeable part of the student wing I know, the SNP is just one of many interests in their lives.
It just felt a bit off to me that he pigeonholed every young person interested in politics as weird. It’s far too sweeping a generalisation based on a small section of those interested, sort of like saying every football fan was a hooligan.
If Portillo was remarking that teenagers & youths whose only ‘hobby’ or interest is student activism are weird, however, then I can see where he’s coming from- to purely live and breathe party politics to the exclusion of all else during the ‘four best years of your life’ does seem a waste to me.