For many Central constituencies, a Labour win can be perceived as something of an open and shut case. Let’s see what, if any, surprises may be sprung in 2011.
Airdrie & Shotts – There’s something about this constituency that, to me, has always seemed to be an SNP Gain in the making. Sophia Coyle reduced the 2003 8,977 majority to 1,446 in 2007 and boundary changes reduced it further to 633. Perhaps that is where the SNP will top out given the giant leap forward last time but, with just another push, this could be the SNP’s Cunninghame North or Striling of 2011. I had planned on giving this to Labour and my model does suggest they will shade it but I’ve just learned that it is the enigmatic Alex Neil who is standing for the SNP. Against Karen Whitefield, I have to think that the Nats will have enough to push them over the edge and finally this constituency will be SNP Gain – Alex Neil
Coatbridge & Chryston – Easy Labour hold – Elaine Smith
Cumbernauld & Kilsyth – Another Labour marginal that the SNP will do its best to throw West-coast resources at. A lot depends on what the locals think of their MSP Cathie Craigie who has served them for 12 years and what the addition of “MSP†will have done to their perception of challenger Jamie Hepburn (who I happen to think is amongst the very brightest and best of the Nat Rat Pack at Holyrood). That said, strictly on what the polls today are telling me, I am calling this for Labour. Labour hold – Cathy Craigie
East Kilbride – Probably the SNP’s best chance of a big scalp comes here with Andy Kerr holding a 1,972 majority over Linda Fabiani from 2007, increased to 2,108 after boundary changes. The same two do battle again but there is more scope for tactical voting and/or Lib Dems voting elsewhere given the 7,000+ votes for Lib Dems/Tories in 2007 (which is considerably higher than LD/Tory votes in other constituencies). I reckon Labour will get enough top up votes from ex Liberal Democrats to keep a nice majority here. Labour hold – Andy Kerr
Falkirk East – An interesting seat this one as Keith Brown stood for the SNP in 2003 and Annabelle Ewing stood in 2007, both unable to strip back the Labour majority. On a national voteshare of Lab – 35% and SNP 34%, this seat has a majority for Labour of 2,632. Reversing that voteshare to put the SNP in the lead reduces the majority to a still substantial 1,901 so I don’t see the SNP challenger Angus MacDonald winning through unless something rather special happens. Labour hold – Cathy Peattie
Falkirk West – A rare SNP seat in a sea of red in the West, Michael Matheson holding a notional 743 majority going into this contest. Denis Goldie returns to fight for his seat back for Labour but, with the national voteshare prescribed above, the SNP cling on by 66 votes and, in truth, I suspect they’ll hold on by even more than that. SNP hold – Michael Matheson.
Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse – An easy hold for Tom McCabe as Christina McKelvie fights in vain for the win. Labour hold – Tom McCabe
Motherwell & Wishaw – Jack McConnell’s old constituency should change hands from the former First Minister to the 2011 candidate with a reduced majority but no real surprises. John Swinburne of SCCUP to finish 3rd ahead of Conservatives and Lib Dems. Labour hold – John Pentland (Interesting aside, the Lib Dem candidate in 2003 was called K.Legg)
Uddingston & Bellshill – Michael McMahon to stroll back into office with a 5,000+ majority. Labour hold – Michael McMahon
So, that’s 2 for the SNP and 7 for Labour. Let’s see how that impacts upon the d’hondt allocation for Central with a national voteshare of Lab – 36%, SNP – 33%, Con – 13%, Lib Dem – 8%, Greens – 6%
1 – SNP (Jamie Hepburn)
2 – SNP (Linda Fabiani)
3 – Conservative (Margaret Mitchell)
4 – SNP (Richard Lyle)
5 – Labour (Siobhan McMahon)
6 – SNP (Christina McKelvie)
7 – Labour (Mark Griffin)
8 – SNP (Angus McDonald)
Total (2007 in brackets)
Labour – 9 (8)
SNP – 6 (7)
Conservative – 1 (1)
Lib Dems 0 – (1)
Greens – 0 (0)
So, the net loser of the reduction in FPTP seats here is the SNP, despite my predicting them to win Airdrie & Shotts. This makes sense since it is SNP-held Kilmarnock & Loudon that has been chopped up and spread out. As can be seen from the d’hondt allocation, it’s a bit of a see-saw effect over who between the SNP will pick up that valuable seventh seat as it alternates SNP/Labour from position 4 onwards but, nonetheless, Labour go into this contest with something of an upper hand.
This is of course the region that Hugh O’Donnell has decided not to stand for the Lib Dems in. I had not reflected that factor in my workings and the Lib Dems still didn’t get a seat, limping out of the region altogether, so I do not expect that Hugh will win one as an independent. John Swinburne will stand here for the SCCUP, the Socialists have Kevin McVey and the Greens have Kirsten Robb. Even with a 6% national voteshare, I can’t see the Greens winning a seat here unfortunately; I make them to be a good 4,700 votes off taking that 7th spot.
So all in all a pretty straightforward region where the SNP and Labour really are in a two-horse race on the face of things.
Tactical Voting considerations
From an SNP perspective, it’s straightforward, vote SNP in every constituency and with every regional vote because the party is either number 1 or number 2 in each seat.
For the Greens, their main problem is that they simply don’t have enough votes to be in the mix. They really need to outscore the Lib Dems (which I have them to do by 300 votes) and take more than half of the Conservative voteshare (which I have them 600 votes short of) to have any real chance of scooping a seat here. Labour and SNP look too strong as things stand at the moment though.
#1 by Malc on April 1, 2011 - 2:03 pm
Groan. I share your hunch about Alex Neil in Airdrie & Shotts… but I went 7 rounds with someone defending why I’d gone for the incumbent in narrow cases. More difficult to defend with Labour being incumbents here… but I suppose Will’s QIB comes into play a little (though not fully, since Karen Whitefield is also an incumbent).
I don’t know – I genuinely think this is a coin toss seat, and will come down to who gets their vote out on the day. Alex Neil is a more impressive MSP than Karen Whitefield – I think even some Labour activists would support that hypothesis – but whether that is enough to overcome the latent Labour tendencies of the electorate in Central Scotland… who knows.
#2 by Jeff on April 1, 2011 - 2:16 pm
Ha, didn’t mean to spoil your day Malc. The incumbency thing is of course a factor but it is not a hard and fast rule and depends on the incumbent. Nanette Milne was the incumbent in Gordon with a large majority in 2007 but the plucky challenger Alex Salmond still managed to win comfortably. Now, one could say that Alex Neil is no Alex Salmond but one could equally say that that Karen Whitefield is no Nanette Milne.
I’ve backed Labour incumbents, Labour challengers and SNP incumbents before so I think it’s still a fair prediction, based on numbers with an overlay of judgement.
Still, I don’t miss 2003 when the only prediction was by how many thousands Labour were going to hold each of these seats!
#3 by Malc on April 1, 2011 - 2:26 pm
Nanette Milne WAS an incumbent in Gordon, but she wasn’t THE incumbent. She was a Tory list MSP for the North-East. You’re thinking of Nora Radcliffe, the Lib Dem MSP who actually held the seat – but your point holds.
Nevertheless, Salmond wasn’t exactly a “plucky challenger” and was AN incumbent (for a different parliament) in part of the seat, so its not like he came from nowhere.
And I’ not saying you are wrong – like I say, I share the hunch. I’m just not keen on trying to defend the assertion!
#4 by Jeff on April 1, 2011 - 2:31 pm
Bah, I knew I should have checked the names on that one. I got cocky and got it wrong….
#5 by Indy on April 1, 2011 - 2:23 pm
As I recall the Sophia Coyle campaign went heavily on saving Monklands A&E. Perhaps Labpur’s u-turn on that is an indication that they think that issue still has resonance?
#6 by Jeff on April 1, 2011 - 2:30 pm
Good memory Indy! I neglected to consider that. Looking at the Westminster contest in 2010, the SNP (with Sophia) didn’t make much of a dent in Labour’s majority, even with Pamela Nash taking over from John Reid. Maybe I was getting carried away with an SNP gain after all.
Note that Labour winning A&S would not change the seats won by parties, only change would be Karen Whitefield in place at Holyrood instead of Mark Griffin.
#7 by Gaz on April 1, 2011 - 3:17 pm
Can you check your numbers Jeff?
If the vote share is 36% v 33% I would have thought that D’Hondt would allocate the last seat to the SNP to make it 8 v 7 overall rather allocate it to Labour to make it 9 v 6?
#8 by Jeff on April 1, 2011 - 3:29 pm
How very dare you.
No, just joking, but my numbers stack up. I suspect you’ve taken 36% and 33% as the Central region voteshare for Labour and SNP respectively. IN my model, these figures are the national voteshare.
The Central voteshare (which I had assumed not many would be interested in) is Lab – 50.0%, SNP – 34.2% , Con – 8.2%, Green – 3.8%, LD – 3.7%
Note, ‘others’ excluded from voteshare calc.
I get SNP regional votes = 88,352, Labour regional votes = 129149 if that helps.
#9 by Gaz on April 1, 2011 - 5:17 pm
That would explain it then!!!
Thanks.
#10 by Doug Daniel on April 1, 2011 - 3:27 pm
Wow, seven constituency seats and yet Labour would STILL be on course for two list seats, with the gap between Labour and SNP going from one seat to three? Very depressing reading.
How has that happened? With just 3% difference in the list votes, surely Labour shouldn’t be getting more than one MSP more than the SNP overall? This is why I’m not always completely convinced by d’Hondt – how can they get 53% of the total seats on a list vote of just 36%? They’re already over-represented with the constituencies, since seven seats is about 41% of the total seats.
#11 by Malc on April 1, 2011 - 3:32 pm
As Jeff says in response to another comment, its to do with the vote share in the region. If Labour are on course for a national share of 36%, they’d pick up 50% of the vote in Central Scotland. 50% of the vote roughly correlates with 53% of the seats.
Another point to factor in – the reason there was a gap of 1 seat between Lab & SNP last time around was because the SNP won Kilmarnock & Loudoun, which was in the region the last time. This time around, it slots into South Scotland, so the SNP are already a seat down on last time.
#12 by Jeff on April 1, 2011 - 3:45 pm
Yep, just to add to Malc’s points, Labour missed out on taking the 7th list seat in 2007 by 233 votes. That’s only, what, 117 people deciding to vote Labour rather than SNP and we’d have had Jack McConnell as FM for the past 4 years.
By such fine margins elections are won and lost. So it’s more that the SNP scraped it last time than Labour have got lucky this time.
And, as Malc says, 50% of the votes means 50% of the seats so that’s 8 seats for Labour from that alone. But there are 30,000 regional votes going towards parties getting 3%, 4% etc but not winning anys MSPs for their efforts. That splintering of the ‘others’ (incl Lib Dems) allows Labour in for an extra one.
And, to be fair, it gives the SNP 37.5% of the seats with only 34.2% of the voteshare so they can’t complain really either.
#13 by Doug Daniel on April 1, 2011 - 8:10 pm
Ahh, I clearly wasn’t paying enough attention. I don’t know why I didn’t find it strange for Labour to be getting just 36% in this area.
#14 by Danny1995 on April 1, 2011 - 8:16 pm
I have Labour winning all FPTP seats( I live in Falkirk West and Goldie seems to have momentum).
List – 6 SNP and a Tory.
Running total(6 of 8 predicted.)
LAB – 38
SNP – 36
CON – 10
LD – 7
GRN – 1
IND – 1
#15 by Reluctant Hero on April 1, 2011 - 11:33 pm
“Coatbridge & Chryston – Easy Labour hold – Elaine Smith”
I love that analysis!
It has been depressing politically, living in this constituency for the past 10 years, but that at least brought a smile to my face.
You can’t go far wrong with that prediction!
#16 by Jeff on April 2, 2011 - 9:19 am
What can I say. I really wanted to get down to the seeds and stems of this seat and, you know, I think I pulled it off.
It didn’t help that this was a lunchtime blitz post and not a lazy evening one….
Anything you’d add for the constituency? Seems a foregone conclusion surely…
#17 by Top Tory Aide on April 2, 2011 - 7:13 am
Do you think the fact that Michael Matheson doesn’t live in the seat and lives in the Southside of Glasgow will have any impact?
Am not saying it’s vital to live in the seat by any stretch of the imagination but when seats are fairly close then factors like that may come into play.
#18 by Jeff on April 2, 2011 - 9:17 am
Aha, this old chestnut again. I think it could make a difference, yes. Regardless of party, I personally tend to be much less likely to vote for an ‘outsider’ but I could well be in the minority there.
And a local issue here can be cancelled out by a local issue there but, you never know, could be a factor given, as you say, it’s a tight seat.
#19 by Top Tory Aide on April 2, 2011 - 5:28 pm
Jeff, was asking in a devil’s advocate sorta way.
#20 by Jeff on April 2, 2011 - 7:08 pm
Apologies, I only do angelic innocence 😉
Pingback: #sp11 Regions revisited – West and Central Scotland « A Burdz Eye View