This is a guest post from Aidan Skinner. He’s also not the Messiah.
As a Labour man, you’d expect me to say it’s all Alex Salmond’s fault. Well it is. The Holyrood 2011 campaign is a few weeks old and so far it’s been dominated by one man. Monty Python. The SNP started it with the “What have the Romans ever done for us” party political broadcast. Then Iain Gray joined in, doing his best Terry Jones impression at the Labour conference.
At which point it got silly. STV tried to make up for excluding Patrick Harvie from the debate and by showing him as the messiah in their iconography. The Liberal Democrats joined in by splitting into the Democratic Liberal Party (O’Donnell-Mcdaid) and John Farquhar Munro forming the Popular Front (Alex Salmond for First Minister).
It’s all very reminiscent of days spent setting fire to Space Raiders in student unions to see if pickled onion ones burn better than cheese (they do). As has, unfortunately, been the level of debate so far (reminded me of student days, although I’m sure some would like to set all of Holyrood a light with a Bic). With Labour and the SNP occupying much the same policy ground and dominating the share of the vote it’s all been a bit “I put it to him that he smells and should TAKE A SHOWER”. Policies are being stolen, positions are being triangulated,blusters are being.. blown? Anyway, I don’t think Sunder Katwala’s prediction of a red-yellow coalition is likely, but he does have a point about the virulence of the debate between the two being at least partly due to the broad similarity of the policies and the search for synthetic differences.
Ultimately, though, I think there is one big difference. And that’s the form the two administrations could take, as has been outlined in this blog previously. Another SNP minority government with Tory support is conceivable but I can’t really see Annabel Goldie leading her troops into a tacit agreement with Labour. John Reid’d blow a blood vessel for one thing, and who’d clear that up? The Lib Dems arealso pretty toxic to Labour at the moment, and might not even have enough seats to put together a majority Labour-LibDem government anyway. So perhaps the difference is less one of substance, more who’s going to come to whose painfully obscure indie night. Hopefully now we’re in manifesto week we’ll get some actual substance. They’re rather dry and dull things though, so here’s a handy precis of what you can expect to see from each party:
Tories – due to the mess we inherited from Labour all you can have is dry toast. As the former first secretary to the Treasury said “there is no jam left”.
Lib Dems – at the last election we promised jam for everyone. We didn’t win outright, and due to the mess we inherited from Labour all you can have is dry toast. We still hold to our Liberal Democrat policy of jam tomorrow.
SNP – the London government has imposed budget cuts so all you can have is dry toast. In an independent Scotland we’d be able to use oil revenue to purchase jam for everyone.
Labour – due to the savage and unnecesssary cuts imposed by the Tory-led government in Westminster everyone has to have dry toast. We have however secured a new jam-making apprenticeship scheme so the young people of Scotland can learn to make jam tomorrow.
Greens – our continued dependence on jam is unsustainable. Everyone should begin a transition to rape seed oil spread.
#1 by Douglas McLellan on April 6, 2011 - 9:31 am
Like the post. But you got the Greens manifesto wrong. It should have been:
There is plenty of jam. But the rich are using it all on their toast. We shall therefore take the jam from the rich and give it to the poor so the poor need not suffer the fate of dry toast. All while possibly wearing green tights.
(Also, I still think that image shows Patrick with Lisa Simpson hair)
#2 by James on April 6, 2011 - 9:35 am
Green tights are not in our manifesto. Is this what you’re referring to?
#3 by Douglas McLellan on April 6, 2011 - 10:35 am
No green tights. Is that a manifesto exclusive?
No so much. I was kind of referring to Patrick Harvies support for a Robin Hood Tax.
#4 by James on April 6, 2011 - 11:35 am
And that link is to Cleese as Hood.
#5 by Douglas McLellan on April 6, 2011 - 11:44 am
But it is also from Time Bandits. Not a totally Pyton film which is the theme of the post. Kind of.
Not disparaging your link though. Just it wasnt where my head was.
#6 by Malc on April 6, 2011 - 11:51 am
Perhaps we could afford more jam if we bought the rights to the name Douglas? From the looks of things, we’d get plenty of royalties from folk who comment on this blog…
#7 by Douglas McLellan on April 6, 2011 - 11:57 am
I claim prior use!
You would also have to go for the derivatives as well.
Dougie
Doug
and the further west I travel in Scotland the more likely I am to get called – Doog.
#8 by Doug Daniel on April 6, 2011 - 6:50 pm
Already done.
(Well, I’ve bought the web domains, anyway.)
#9 by Richard Thomson on April 6, 2011 - 10:05 am
That’s a braw head of hair Patrick’s got in that photo. Oor Willie would be jealous 🙂
#10 by DougtheDug on April 6, 2011 - 10:16 am
Tories – due to the mess we inherited from Labour all you can have is dry toast unless you’re rich like us. As the former Labour first secretary to the Treasury said “there is no jam left and bugger all toast”.
Lib Dems – at the last election we promised jam for everyone. Due to the mess we inherited from Labour all you can have is dry toast. We still hold to our Liberal Democrat policy of swapping principles for ministerial toasters.
SNP – the London government has imposed budget cuts so all you can have is dry toast. We are fighting for an independent Scotland where we’d be able to use oil and other revenues to put something on the toast.
Labour – due to the savage and unnecesssary cuts imposed by the Tory-led government in Westminster everyone has to have dry toast unless your rich like our Shadow Cabinet. We are fighting hard to ensure that Scotland remains under the Tory-led government in Westminster and that the toast remains dry because it’s a Union benefit.
Greens – In the face of cuts we also need to put the taxes up to ensure a continued toast supply under the Tory-led government in Westminster. If public opinion is for independence and something on the toast we’ll follow the herd.
#11 by Doug Daniel on April 6, 2011 - 11:33 am
Labour – due to the Tory-led government in Westminster making savage cuts in jam, you’ll all have to have dry toast. Oh, and you’ll have to pay local toast providers whatever amount they want to charge to buy your toast, and if you want to learn how to make toast, we’ll have to charge you money for that. Incidentally, we have no idea where all the jam went. It was there when we were in government. Honest.
SNP – due to the Tory-led government in Westminster making savage jam cuts – which were the fault of the previous Labour government creating a massive jam deficit – you’ll have to have dry toast. However, we are at least insuring that local toast providers do not charge you more money for toast. We also intend to make sure that nobody has to pay money to learn how to make toast.
Labour – oh yeah, when we said we would let local toast providers charge whatever they want for toast, we really meant that we would make sure they did NOT charge you more. This, incidentally, has been our position all along. Oh, and people wanting to learn how to make toast don’t need to pay either. That’s always been our position too.
Tories – due to the completely and utterly necessary cuts in jam at Westminster, we unfortunately can’t afford to provide jam for everyone, and we certainly can’t afford to train people to learn how to make toast to ensure that future generations have the ability to maintain their own supplies of toast. Obviously, if you’re rich, it won’t matter anyway. We don’t really care about other people – we’re fairly sure they don’t eat toast anyway, certainly not with jam on.
Lib Dems – We don’t want to charge people to learn how to make toast. Except when we do. We also believe we need to change how people are charged for toast at a local level. Except when someone else suggests it too. We would like to sell off bits of our tea making facilities, but it’s not privatisation, honest. Somehow people will just give us money for nothing. Then we can buy some more jam for your toast. Except that we probably won’t. What’s toast?
Greens – we believe the carbon produced by making toast is harmful to the environment. We therefore believe everyone should switch to low-carbon bread.
#12 by Alwyn ap Huw on April 6, 2011 - 4:45 pm
How disappointing, I would have hoped that the SNP would have offered Dundee Marmalade tomorrow not English Jam tomorrow – is the party beginning to lose touch with its roots?
#13 by Doug Daniel on April 6, 2011 - 10:59 am
Has the Scottish Greens logo changed recently? I’ve never noticed it before, but it reminds me a lot of the BP logo. With less yellow, obviously.
#14 by James on April 6, 2011 - 11:15 am
It’s our campaign branding. We’ll take a decision on long-term logo after the election.
#15 by Indy on April 6, 2011 - 11:15 am
So that’s what Patrick Harvie would look like with Gunther from “Friends””s hair. That was an apostrophically challenging sentence there.
He’s probably best sticking with the baldy napper after all.
#16 by jim on April 6, 2011 - 1:22 pm
Of course, under Labour you’d better not expect to spread your jam with a knife, lest you want to be doing so in the pokey!
#17 by Indy on April 6, 2011 - 3:20 pm
wooden spoons for all
#18 by Malc on April 6, 2011 - 6:03 pm
Now there’s something Scottish rugby fans are used to…