I can’t be the only one who is just feeling a bit… well, unenthusiastic about the Scottish Parliamentary campaign thus far. Â I know. Â I’m never the most enthusiastic when it comes to our political parties (I always expect far too much from them) so perhaps its just me at my Victor Meldrew best. Â But this campaign has just failed to inspire me. Â Thus far, that is.
I don’t want this to be a full-on moan, but there are some things I have noticed in the way the campaign has gone.
Usually when a party has been in government they’ve had to defend their record from attacks from their opposition… but not this time. Â And this is despite the fact that, as a minority government, the SNP haven’t been able to deliver on everything they promised in 2007. Â And yet, they’ve had a largely free-ride to remind the electorate what they’ve done so far and make a few more promises to boot. Â They’ve also kept it largely positive thus far, focusing mostly on themselves and the strengths of their team. Â But its the latter element that is slightly concerning when it comes to policy. Â Yes the team of Salmond, Sturgeon, Swinney, MacAskill, Russell and Lochhead (not to mention Crawford et al.) is impressive – and, in my eyes, considerably more impressive than the alternative – but the people are only as good as the policies, which we haven’t heard that much about. Â Sure, the big ticket items – the Council Tax freeze, the keeping fees free, keeping the 1,000 police officers – they’ve been happy to trumpet, but the main message has been “if you like our team, vote again for Alex Salmond for First Minister”.
Contrast that with Labour – the supposed government-in-waiting. Â They spent the whole of the previous parliamentary term picking fights with what the SNP wanted to deliver… then when the starting gun went for the election, they adopted many of these same policies in their manifesto. Â They decided that their campaign shouldn’t focus on the election in question and instead re-fight last year’s UK election (which was successful for them) and the 1980s battles with the Tories (which weren’t). Â When they realised that folk didn’t like that negative message, they turned their fire on the SNP, calling Salmond “dangerous”. Â Other than the SNP’s policies in Labour colours, the discredited knife/ prison policy and the increasingly negative (and in some cases, vitriolic) critiques of the SNP, I don’t know that much about what Labour are about – and I really don’t know what they’d do in government.
The media have made this an SNP-Labour fight, but the Tories have managed to look distinctive on certain issues. Â Or perhaps that “distinctive” should be “controversial”. Â Taking 14 year olds who don’t want to be in school out of school and putting them into apprenticeships has been billed as the Tories forcing children into work. Â Which tells you what the campaign has been like really. Â On the face of it, that’s an accurate description of the policy – but scratch the surface a bit, and think it through a bit… maybe it makes a bit more sense than you first think. Â By all means, disagree with it if you don’t think its a good idea – but lets have less of the hyperbole. Â Its not putting kids into work – its letting them have a choice about what is good for their future. Â Anyway – that’s a distinctive Tory policy. Â They’ve also claimed responsibility for freezing the council tax, town centre regeneration funds and 1,000 new police officers and since the SNP needed their votes to deliver these things, I suppose that’s fair cop. Â But what are they proposing for now? Â Apparent from the apprenticeships thing… I really don’t know.
And then there’s the Lib Dems. Â They’ve taken a different tact from the other parties and made their campaign about one issue: stopping the amalgamation of Scotland’s police forces into one force. Â They even made their PEB about it. Â Tavish is driving a car with the slogan “Save our Police” around Scotland for two days to hammer home the message. Â If people know one thing about the Lib Dems in this campaign, its that they want to “Save our Police”. Â Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately, since knowing more about them means equating them with the coalition) that’s about it. Â They’ve talked so much about the police issue that even my Gran knows that’s what they stand for (not that it helps – she won’t vote for them!). Â But neither my Gran nor anyone else knows anything else they would do in the next Scottish Parliamentary term if they are in a position of influence. Â I could mention the Scottish Water thing – but even then I only know about that because I watched their campaign launch. Â Since then its been police, police, police. Â Just think about that – a liberal campaign focused on justice. Â For me, they need to make the next week about something else – partly so we know a bit more about them and partly so we don’t get bored.
The Greens… well, Scottish media have decided this campaign is about the SNP & Labour and given the Tories and Lib Dems their necessary airtime but largely ignored the Greens. Â Which is a shame for several reasons, not least because they are actually saying things which are radically different from the other parties. Â They want to keep tuition fees free – and pay for it with a rise in tax. Â They want to stop the cuts – again paid for by an increase in tax. Â And they want to insulate every home in Scotland. Â Three clear objectives which set the party out as distinct. Â But again, I’ve heard little about the policies (mainly because the Greens have mostly been counted out of political debate).
So – next Thursday you can vote for a party with a great team to run Scotland. Â Or a party who will simply criticise everyone else without saying what they’ll do better. Â Or a party who (apparently) want to force children into work. Â Or a party who want to “Save out Police” and nothing else. Â Or for a party who the media have decided don’t really count.
Any of those choices sound appealing? Â I don’t know, maybe I’m just being cynical (never!) but I’d like to have a bit more than soundbites and personalities to go on when I go to vote next week. Â Since none of the campaign thus far has focused on it, can we have a final week that focuses on policy please? Â I won’t hold my breath.
#1 by A Brown on April 28, 2011 - 5:35 pm
Labour undoubtedly made an error on a perceived lack of policy on council tax reform
They also should have focused more on transport etc.
#2 by Doug Daniel on April 28, 2011 - 6:19 pm
Malc – you, being cynical?
I don’t believe it.
#3 by Malc on April 28, 2011 - 7:54 pm
*like*
#4 by Mr. Mxyzptlk on April 28, 2011 - 6:48 pm
Has anyone said anything interesting yet?
me neighbor did tell me a good tip on how to re-pot
me geraniums …….well interesting
#5 by Malc on April 28, 2011 - 7:55 pm
that’s about as interesting as it has gotten…
#6 by An Duine Gruamach on April 28, 2011 - 7:02 pm
To be fair to the Liberals, “Save wir polis” is just about the only potential field of policy that hasn’t been made problematic for them by their colleagues in London.
#7 by Douglas McLellan on April 28, 2011 - 7:21 pm
What is interesting is that Labour, for whatever reason, failed to develop interesting policies and that the Lib Dems have totally failed to communicate their policies which are bold and offer something different.
Labour has been mocked mercilessly for its ill thought out knife crime policy and the Lib Dems have got stuck in this mighty single police force rut we have struggled to get out of.
The Tories policies were also well thought through but presentationally again there were problems as well as the general problem of being a Tory in Scotland (ditto on the Lib Dems).
And as you say the Greens have not been given as much exposure as they would want.
The SNP minority government was competent and business like in its presentation and even when open-goal weaknesses were displayed (Salmond & Sturgeon both saying its ok for Minister to try and influence judicial proceedings) the opposition failed to even kick the ball. All they have needed to do was offer a steady as she goes approach to Scottish people.
Of course, the next parliament will not be steady as she goes with the budget cuts but like last year in the General Election, the public seem to think that everything is going to be ok.
For an election campaign to focus on policy is dangerous for some of the parties. For Labour it would expose how much they have copied the SNP policies and for the SNP it would hint that they might run out of ideas sooner than they did in the last government.
I would love to have a toe-to-toe, evidence-to-evidence policy based final week. For one thing, it would give the Lib Dems a better chance.
#8 by Don Francisco on April 28, 2011 - 8:20 pm
The Labour campaign makes me think of In The Thick of It – soundbites & half thought through/non-existent policies thrown in with a bit of public humilation. It’s all been so entertaining that the public/media have practically forgotten what the other parties are proposing.
A shame as you point out in reference to the policies put forward by the Greens & Tories, which if the light of day shone on them, might actually promote that most increasingly rare thing these days, a public political discussion and debate. Instead we have SNP promising more of the same with Labour keeping us amused.
#9 by Kate on April 28, 2011 - 8:21 pm
Actually I thought “we” all had lots of interesting things to say last night!
But bang on the money. I’m totally toiling for an election round-up post this week – what is there to talk about?
#10 by cynicalHighlander on April 28, 2011 - 8:46 pm
There is always tomorrow as Gray will not have to run from Alex as he is busy elsewhere. I think the most telling thing so far is how Labour will fabricate the truth expecting all of the media to back them all of the time even when the videos show a different story.
#11 by Stuart Winton on April 28, 2011 - 11:16 pm
Type your comment here
Which more or less sums up the SNP’s approach as well.
But you’re right, cynicalHighlander – if Iain Gray gets any worse at running away then he might as well join SIR Sean in the Bahamas, or wherever it is he actually lives.
But since I think there are two (?) leaders’ debates over the next few days then they’ll probably dominate proceedings, which may or may not provide some elucidation on policy, but since they’ll just be a glorifed FMQs without so much shouting then I doubt it.
#12 by Stuart on April 29, 2011 - 8:07 am
The one person that I’ve heard put real pressure on the SNP was Gary Robertson on Good Morning Scotland when interviewing Angus Robertson MP, as he kept pushing the question why Alex Salmond has used public money to block information coming out on the Local Income Tax.
It’s quite telling that none of the other parties have really picked up on that.
#13 by Doug Daniel on April 29, 2011 - 11:07 am
But then, even that isn’t really debating issues, particularly as LIT isn’t in the SNP manifesto for this campaign.
Perhaps the other parties didn’t pick up on it because the reality is the last thing they want is to get voted into government and suddenly find that the information they get from civil servants on which to formulate policy is no longer privileged information, so opposition parties can start picking plans apart before they’ve even been started? Or maybe because one party in particular realises that the amount of public money it wastes on pointless FOI requests dwarves any money the SNP has used to try and keep this information secret?
#14 by John Ruddy on April 29, 2011 - 10:59 am
I dont get this – on the one hand you say that Labour should have attacked the SNP more, but the moment they do, they get attacked for being negative?
#15 by Rev. S. Campbell on April 29, 2011 - 2:18 pm
I’d genuinely quite like to know what part of this you’ve interpreted as a demand for Labour to “attack the SNP more”:
Seriously – which sentences or phrases from that caused you to arrive at such a conclusion?
#16 by John Ruddy on April 29, 2011 - 4:53 pm
I assume the phrase “Usually when a party has been in government they’ve had to defend their record from attacks from their opposition… but not this time.” indicates that there is a requirement to attack the SNP more.
#17 by Rev. S. Campbell on April 29, 2011 - 9:28 pm
Well, I can see why a Labour supporter might interpret it that way. Personally I read it as “Usually when a party has been in government they’ve had to defend THEIR RECORD from attacks from their opposition”, an interpretation supported by the following line “but the people are only as good as THE POLICIES, WHICH WE HAVEN’T HEARD THAT MUCH ABOUT” (my emphasis on both).
Labour haven’t exactly shied away from attacking the SNP for the last four weeks, or the last four years come to that. It’s just that they tend to attack them over Alex Salmond wearing a hat or – a huge shock to Scottish voters, this one – being interested in independence.
#18 by An Duine Gruamach on April 29, 2011 - 2:42 pm
You’re making the mistake of assuming that critiquing policy is the same thing as shouting “Salmond is dangerous!”, “Bonkers, crazy, insane!”
#19 by Mr. Mxyzptlk on April 29, 2011 - 12:32 pm
Malc
I say many many interesting things (well i thinks they are)
its just you keep moderating them( Boring old Malc)
anyways just been watching Kate Middleton win the Election for Iain Gray phew! was gettin a tad worried till then.
Royal fervor nothing quite like it!
#20 by Stuart Winton on April 29, 2011 - 8:13 pm
Type your comment here
Which would at least save time and money in formulating something that’s a non-starter?
And surely the point about LTI not being in the SNP’s manifesto is that it demonstrates that it was ill-thought out to start with and thus has been kicked into the long grass to avoid akward questions during the campaign.
Sounds like a point worth making to me, but to the extent that none of the parties seem willing or able to come up with a plausible council tax replacement then to that extent you’re correct.
But I can never really understand this FOI exemption for policy development if in fact it could help policy development by exposing it to criticism.
#21 by James on April 29, 2011 - 8:40 pm
Stuart, as the only party in Holyrood last session proposing an alternative to the Council Tax I slightly resent that.
#22 by John on April 29, 2011 - 9:23 pm
O/T but is there a list anywhere of constituencies and regions and the time they declared results at in 2007?
#23 by Stuart Winton on April 30, 2011 - 12:21 am
Type your comment here
Fair point, James. Indeed the Greens did cross my mind when I was making the point, but I couldn’t quite remember what was what, which is why I included the ‘plausible’ qualification.
Not that that’s a criticism on the policy proposal per se, more a comment on the chances of it becoming law ;0)
Pingback: Lib Dems of a weak disposition should look away now… « Better Nation