How does the saying go? A picture is worth a thousand words and elections are no different. The uninitiated might think the battle is for copy and content but no. One big, fat visual is enough to make even the most grumpy campaign co-ordinator smile. For a moment anyhow.
So, two and a bit weeks in, a slew of manifesto launches later, who is winning this particular battle?
Never thought I’d be saying this but STV vs the Beeb? No contest. Hats off to Matt Roper, the digital content geek at STV - the commercial channel has wiped the floor with the one what we pay for. And frankly, have a right to expect better from.
STVstole a march with the first televised leaders’ debate and a live blog facility. Its offering includes news, news round ups, live streaming, a postcode searchable facility for your constituency and region, profiles of them and the candidates, blogs and analysis, a twitter stream for all candidates, its pack of reporters assigned a party each, a polling panel, innovative programming and of course, Bernard Ponsonby overseeing proceedings.
What does BBC Scotland offer? A shoestring in comparison. No dedicated election space or heading. A bog standard round up page that scrolls the oldest first (even the burd knows that is a big no-no). There is, though, an impressively designed candidate map with postcode search facility. And of course, Brian’s Blog (Taylor in case you were wondering), though it’s not been updated since Wednesday. Tsk, tsk. It is all a bit, well bitty and half hearted.
The fact remains, though, that newspapers and what they print during the campaign will play a big role in informing the voting public, even if they are no longer the influencers they once were. Looking at this week through the papers’ pictures provides some clues about who they will all be backing and urging their readers to back.
It’s unlikely that the Record will spring a surprise on us this election by transferring its traditional allegiance from Labour. The Tories’ manifesto launch got a whole page (with an image of Annabel looking like she was about to eat the thing), the Lib Dems a paltry half page with a bigger photie of Iain Gray than Tavish Scott, and Labour a full two pages, complete with graphics, analysis and one or two well place pics of the leader. Everyday this week (I think – funnily enough, I’m not an habitual Record reader) Iain Gray’s fizzog featured somewhere, though Nicola Sturgeon also scored a few. If Record readers still can’t recognise Mr Gray at the end of the campaign, it won’t be for its trying.
The Sun appears to be moving towards backing the SNP if its current coverage and slant is any indicator. Some nice pics of Salmond, highly positive coverage, a couple of front page exclusives, all adding up to what seems like a successful wooing. A result in any party’s book.
Of the two Scottish broadsheets, the Scotsman is playing it most canny. Pretty fair, proportionate coverage so far for all the parties and a share of the images. Plenty action shots which they all like: how refreshing that someone is playing nicely. The Herald – well, if they don’t come out for Labour I’m going to be a curry and a tenner down. The Tories got a nice pic of Annabel (with a bizarre rainbow background) and damning headlines for their manifesto launch, but by far and away the best image of Iain Gray this week appeared in Thursday’s edition to coincide with his party’s manifesto launch.
The SNP, of course, tried to steal Labour’s thunder with Brian Cox’s endorsement of the SNP in this election. Did it work? Sort of. A great big splash and clever headline on the front page of the Sun on the morning of Labour’s manifesto launch ensured coverage spilling over into the broadcast news headlines and into other newspapers the following day.
They did the same to the Lib Dems, with the endorsement of Salmond for FM from retiring MSP John Farquhar Munro. They needn’t have bothered – no one was up for covering it much anyway. Yesterday’s people would appear to be the view of the meeja, which tells us a lot.
In terms of news management, the SNP is playing a blinder, though its Scottish Futures Fund launch did fall a bit flat, when such an initiative deserved much more coverage. Its experience tells, not least because they have veteran media man Kevin Pringle at the helm. But they should be careful on two counts. Playing dirty can always backfire, especially when the other parties have time to prepare to counter the SNP’s manifesto launch this coming Tuesday. Moreover, the problem with blizzarding is that news – and pictures, as happened this week – can get lost in the whiteout.
But of course, the images that dominated the week are the ones that Iain Gray will want to forget. Whoever is advising him on media management deserves a dressing down. Or locked in a cupboard until it’s all over and replaced with some more experienced heavyweights.
There’s a Goldilocks effect at play right now. The SNP? Too much. Labour? Too little. The media with its low boredom threshhold and attention span needs to be fed just the right amount of stories and images to sate its appetite. Otherwise, incidents like the one in Glasgow Central station end up dominating the headlines.
Does Labour’s PR fail mark a downward turning point as some journalists and commentators are suggesting? Nah.  A bad media day dents the morale of the party concerned and provides a filip for the opposition. Such incidents provide a day’s news, and while they might entertain the masses for a moment, they do not actually influence the outcome of elections. Anyone remember Jennifer’s ear?
#1 by The Burd on April 9, 2011 - 12:41 pm
Well after much faffing and techie failure on the burd’s part it’s up, but not the most recent draft.
Someone had the audacity to ask for a pic of “anyfink”. Bloody cheek, as if toil and tears wasn’t enough… Will try harder next time, oh Better Nation master.
But the point is…. I did give the Greens a single, solitary honourable mention because STV posted their announcement on land values tax at top of the election news yesterday. It just didn’t make the version that was posted.
Other than that – and I was looking honest – they are getting very little coverage. Which is a shame. And they deserve more, not least because they have good things to say and say them well.
James, you might need to think up some outrageous photo opps to pique interest…
#2 by Colin on April 9, 2011 - 12:52 pm
I absolutely agree concerning the election coverage on STV – it has been exemplary!
The BBC’s coverage has been very poor, which is worrying since a lot more people use the BBC and as a public broadcaster it should really cover the election in more detail. Perhaps then we will see a little less apathy.
#3 by Allan on April 9, 2011 - 2:27 pm
Might go and check out the STV site, thanks for the tip.
Jennifers ear might not have been a defining moment, but a better example would have been the Gillian Duffy incident from last year. The moment Brown lost the election.
#4 by Doug Daniel on April 9, 2011 - 2:53 pm
“The moment Brown lost the election” – Wasn’t that when Northern Rock went bust and everyone suddenly realised he wasn’t a financial genius after all?
I have to admit, I can’t remember what the ear incident was (which perhaps just proves The Burd’z point). Can someone remind me?
#5 by oldchap on April 9, 2011 - 3:53 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_Jennifer's_Ear
#6 by Allan on April 9, 2011 - 7:41 pm
Not really, remember at that point Brown was supposedly still considering an election at some point in the autumn of 2007.
The thing about the Gillian Duffy moment was that although we all heard the stories about Brown, that moment was effectively the smoking gun for Brown having a quick temper.
#7 by Colin on April 10, 2011 - 2:54 am
I’d say the moment he lost the election was when the Tories announced their inheritance tax cut at their 2007 conference. GB shat it and cancelled the election he’d been about to call. Labour went behind in the polls and remained there for the rest of his premiership. The media had been looking forward to an election and turned against him, he spent the next couple of years shambling from one disaster to another, and ended up the gibbering wreck we know so well.
When he “bottled it” ™ in 2007, everyone knew it was just a matter of time. It was a pretty stupid thing to lose an election over, but the world’s a pretty stupid place.
#8 by The Burd on April 9, 2011 - 2:49 pm
Yep I thought of putting that one in. But actually Brown was always going to lose that election, with or without the Gillian Duffy moment.
I chose Jennifer’s Ear because Labour thought it was a defining moment, everyone said it was, and it turned out not to be.
Same with when Blair was challenged by the woman on cancer treatment and hospital waiting times I think it was.
Also Prescott’s banjo moment…
All described at the time as pivotal and turned out not to be. Think Thursday was definitely not a good day for Labour but we are still 3 weeks out…. and a week is a long time in politics remember?!
#9 by Doug Daniel on April 9, 2011 - 3:22 pm
While yesterday’s fun and games may not lose Labour the election on its own, the fact is it is one of several incidents which combine to portray Labour as amateurish and clumsy. Iain Gray was out of his depth on the STV debate, although if he can squeeze in a couple of years worth of media training between now and the first BBC one, there’s always a chance he can redeem himself. But you add that to the fire alarm incident, which couldn’t have worked better if the SNP had planned it themselves. You can then try to put that down to just bad luck, but then you add in the Central Station debacle, which just served to show Iain Gray as a man who can’t think on his feet (all that time in the taxi to think up the inevitable media response and the best he can come up with is that drivel about Rwanda and Chile?) and who can’t deal with members of the public. It all adds up to build a picture of incompetence, and certainly feels a bit like 2010 all over again. Gordon Brown had numerous attempts to redeem himself, but whenever he had the chance, he just reinforced the image people had of a dithering, Mr Bean-style character.
When things start going bad, they have a habit of continuing to go bad. Is the public going to vote a party into power that can’t even launch its manifesto without things going wrong? It certainly doesn’t give you much confidence in how they’ll cope when they’re having to make decisions on behalf of the country. None of these incidents will lose them the election in isolation; but if things don’t start going right for them soon, there’ll be no turning back. Meanwhile, the SNP continue to get endorsements from weel kent folks. No one is going to vote SNP because Midge Ure thinks Salmond is great, but the narrative these endorsements provide is of the SNP being the party to support in this election, especially as many of them seem to be saying “I wouldn’t normally vote SNP, but I can’t deny they’re the best bet this time round”, which serves to get people to consider whether they really should be voting for their usual party. It also helps that these famous faces tend to be people we might associate with being more intelligent and talented than your average celebrity.
#10 by oldchap on April 9, 2011 - 4:08 pm
Agreed, it’s a war of attrition, all the little things buiding up that reinforce views and wear down the campaigners. There comes a point when it’s not just a run of bad luck but indicative of a deeper issue with organisation.
#11 by John Ruddy on April 9, 2011 - 5:06 pm
I think the more “celebrities” the SNP wheels out, the greater the impression that they are reliant on personality than on policy?
Their biggest selling point to put on the ballot paper is “Alex Salmond for First Minister”, other reasons to vote for them include Brian Cox and Midge Ure supports them, David Murray and some Lib Dem you’ve never heard of thinks Alex would be a great FM. I’m sure he’s a great man to have at a dinner party, and if ever I’d want a barrack-room lawyer to argue the toss over something on my behald, he’s my man – but surely its what he will actually DO that matters?
#12 by Jeff on April 9, 2011 - 6:19 pm
I think you’re underestimating the power that these endorsements carry. Some will think that these well kent faces know more about Politics than they do and trust their judgement, more still will agree that Salmond is doing a good job and would make a better FM than Gray and the reinforcement of that view will be enough to win their vote. I don’t like the lack of policy behind such a strategy but it’d be foolish to write this off as a bad strategy. Wonder who the SNP will have behind them tomorrow?
NB – You have missed out Jack Vetriano, Iain Banks, Andrew Fairlie and Alan Cumming. It’s a far cry from the usual suspect and a real rich seam of Scotland’s proudest sons (a distinct lack of daughters I grant thee!)
#13 by John Ruddy on April 9, 2011 - 6:40 pm
If this is a deliberate strategy (which it appears to be, considering the timed nature of some of the revelations), then this is exposing a lack of confidence in policy?
There maybe some people who will vote based on who their favoured celebrity recommends, but its a bit rich of the SNP having that strategy, when an all too common retort is that Labour voters in some parts of the country will vote for any monkey with a red rossette? Surely hypocritical?
The lack of daughters is born out by the polling – support for the SNP is much higher amongst men than amongst women!
#14 by Jeff on April 9, 2011 - 7:29 pm
Oh, it’s certainly a deliberate strategy but it is necessary.
Let’s be totally honest, Labour were sauntering into a victory a few months ago without really proving themselves. When did Iain Gray and his wider team prove they were a Government in waiting? Voting down a budget that had everything they were asking for? Voting down minimum pricing for apparently petty reasons? Desultory FMQ performances? Despite this, they had 15 point poll leads. How does the SNP fight that?
Well, it looks like the SNP fights this by pulling some big names onto the headlines and trying to jolt a public into looking at them again. And, with polls tightening, who is to say it isn’t working….
I don’t think it’s hypocritical of the SNP to use celebrities; I think they are sharpening minds of voters who might otherwise not have given them a fair chance.
#15 by Malc on April 9, 2011 - 7:35 pm
Also the fact that the SNP manifesto hasn’t been published yet means they are looking for headlines in other ways. Suspect when it is published we’ll see more in the way of policy stuff (I can but hope).
#16 by Una on April 9, 2011 - 11:20 pm
I agree – these endorsements kind of make supporting the SNP acceptable, which is still a massive mountain they have to climb, particularly as a “nationalist” party.
As for the daughters, well the Scottish image is a little too macho generally, but the female celebs are there too… Lou Hickey may not be A-list (yet) but she’s certainly cool. And there’s Elaine C. Smith of course, and Sandi Thom. And while Annie Lennox stops short of supporting the SNP specifically she has given her backing to a certain (greenish?) vision of an independent Scotland …
#17 by Colin on April 10, 2011 - 3:00 am
Ugh. Hope there’ll be no Sandi Thom this time.
#18 by An Duine Gruamach on April 9, 2011 - 10:41 pm
I suspect a number of people in Ross, Skye and Inverness West have heard of John Farquhar Munro.
#19 by Kate on April 9, 2011 - 6:35 pm
#7 Doug I think your analysis is great and you are right that it is the cumulative effect of all these little things. Sometimes it’s the luck that’s against you, other times it’s the lack of attention to detail and it wears down what a party is trying to promote. I would just caution everyone getting carried away – there are 26 days left in this campaign (I think) and a lot can happen. But it does look like Labour are stumbling and tripping while the SNP machine gathers momentum.
Re all the endorsements – they do help but there is a tipping point that will make the SNP seem as though it is ganging up on Labour that turns them into an underdog. And that there are so many endorsements people are tuned off.
#10 Jeff I share absolutely concern at the male focus of these endorsements. Wot no wimmin? Is that deliberate or worse, thoughtless, or maybe just none ready yet. Shirley Manson has in the past and of course there is Sandi Thom and Elaine C Smith. As for Iain Banks, he’s an old one ie not new! and Andrew Fairlie well he comes from a well known SNP family (though out in the cold now) so it’s hardly surprising. Labour are bound to have a few up their sleeves, surely?!
#20 by Colin on April 10, 2011 - 3:10 am
Well, they did cut and paste the same Alex Ferguson quote they use every time (“winning team” etc). On the other hand, I quite liked Brian May’s endorsement, which was reasonably thoughtful and actually about an issue (snaring).
#21 by Observer on April 9, 2011 - 7:19 pm
What is good about the celebrity backing is the surprise of some of them. David Murray & Brian Souter on the same side as Alan Cumming & Midge Ure? Iain Banks & Brian Cox chipping in as well – a Liberal Grandee agreeing with Dennis Canavan? It’s not a list of usual haggis sniffers & anything that can get Brian Souter & Alan Cumming on the same platform has to be a good argument. That’s what is coming across with these endorsements – the diversity of the people making them.
#22 by Kate on April 9, 2011 - 7:39 pm
#15 Diversity?! Choke, splutter. All male, all white, oh and all of a certain age!! Alan Cumming and Andrew Fairlie are the youngest! I think it does buy in to the usual SNP demographic actually and that is a problem.
Not knocking the overall endorsement strategy but it needs to work a wee bit harder to hit the right demographics. Unless of course the SNP reckons women are more likely to be impressed by men, in which case I shall choke and splutter some more!!
The endorsements, taken together with everything else, shows a great campaign in action and the whole team deserves credit for that. There is momentum here which will keep going all the way to polling day, barring an “event” or major gaffe….
#23 by Doug Daniel on April 9, 2011 - 9:20 pm
Trying to think of some more people the SNP could try and get endorsements from to make things a bit more diverse is a bit difficult, for me at least. Who is Scottish, famous and not white, male and middle-aged? Karen Gillan? (Now THAT would be a good catch…) Annie Lennox? Evelyn Glennie? Maybe we’ll see a bit more variety over the next few weeks.
#24 by Danny1995 on April 9, 2011 - 7:54 pm
Whilst on the subject of the media, does anybody know what kind of live overnight coverage the BBC/STV are offering on counting night?
#25 by Reluctant Hero on April 9, 2011 - 10:31 pm
Here is a link to what STV are offering on election night. Seems like they are really gearing up for it. Can’t wait!
http://news.stv.tv/politics/237981-election-2011-stv-unveils-ambitious-on-air-and-online-plans/
#26 by Stuart Winton on April 9, 2011 - 8:11 pm
“It also helps that these famous faces tend to be people we might associate with being more intelligent and talented than your average celebrity.”
Funny, the first thing that usually strikes me is that many of them choose to live somewhere other than Scotland.
But if that’s by no means universal then these ‘celebrities’ by definition won’t have the slightest clue about living in the real world, thus while they may inspire some, it certainly won’t be me.
#27 by Malc on April 9, 2011 - 8:19 pm
Your sarcastic post on celebrity endorsements captured this perfectly…
#28 by Kate on April 9, 2011 - 8:11 pm
Re the comparisons with Brown and the Gillian Duffy moment – remember how Scotland voted in 2010? And some of it was a sympathy/admiration vote for Brown. Sean Clerkin is a well known “trouble maker”, not an ordinary punter. WHich is not to be critical, he has led some fantastic direct action campaigns over the years. But folk know that and that ordinary voters wouldn’t have done that to any party leader. I think the SNP has to beware an unintended impact of that moment, but also the shiny, successful, uber, swallowing everything in its wake feel to the campaign at the moment. One thing the Scots dislike more than most is folk getting above themselves… I suppose what I;m trying to say is that the campaign is making me nervous, for all the wrong reasons. Maybe I just need to get out and enjoy it more!
#29 by Doug Daniel on April 9, 2011 - 9:07 pm
True, but any SNP supporter getting ahead of themselves merely has to look at the seat predictions that are coming out of various blogs and websites (I suspect even if/when you and Jeff & Malc redo your seat predictions, you’ll still be showing Labour ahead, although hopefully by less) to realise there is far more to be done. The SNP needs to get a clear few percent more than Labour, and that’s not yet showing in the polls.
#30 by Dubbieside on April 9, 2011 - 8:36 pm
A deliberate strategy? Come again.
Do you honestly think that the SNP phoned up David Murry and Brian Cox and all the rest and said “look we have a bit of a strategy here, it would be great if you could come and endorse Alex Salmond”
These people decided to endorse the SNP as they could see what many of us have seen for ages, that Iain Gray was just not up to the job. Considering that he is supposedly the best they have is it any wonder they are worried about the damage Labour would do to Scotland.
The fact that one of the people really worried about Labour in government, did the voice over for Labours 2007 PPB is not lost on many people.
I think it is quite ironic that Labour are suddenly against celebrity endorsement when Blair and Brown were fawning over anyone they could get their photo taken with.
I also note a certain football manger was rolled out again for his usual endorsement, no criticism there over him, why was that I wonder.
It can be spun many ways, but the bottom line is this is great news for the SNP, and every other party would give their eye teeth for such endorsement.
Personally I am enjoying Labours very obvious pain.
#31 by Doug Daniel on April 9, 2011 - 9:14 pm
I think the strategy people are referring to is the timing of the endorsement announcements, rather than getting the endorsements themselves. It was certainly very handy that long-time Labour supporter Brian Cox announced he was behind the SNP the day of the Labour manifesto launch! Still, that doesn’t displace the fact that he did indeed endorse them. Also, I would agree Labour has never shyed away from celebrity endorsements, nor any party in fact. It’s just one of the many facets of an election campaign these days. I can certainly recall at least one recent Labour PPB featuring almost exclusively celebrities – Richard Wilson and the likes.
#32 by Malc on April 9, 2011 - 9:43 pm
I think what John meant by deliberate strategy was more to do with the SNP’s timing of it than anything – the party are having a quiet period policy-wise before the manifesto launch, so endorsements are filling column inches for them and taking away attention from opponents. But yes – I doubt very much they’ve simply been phoning up celebs and asking for endorsements!
#33 by An Duine Gruamach on April 9, 2011 - 10:56 pm
“A certain football manager”, who, again does not live in Scotland – which might give certain Labour supporters pause for thought when criticising Cox and co. (and, then again, it might not).
#34 by John Ruddy on April 10, 2011 - 12:12 am
Has anyone said that Labour are against celebrity endorsement? I think you are elevating me to a position much greater than the one I occupy in the party!
I have no doubt that Scottish Labour will come out with some endorsers – but the feeling in the party is that people will identify more with ordinary endorsers. Its much better for a voter to see someone like them – a teacher, a worker, a mother etc, saying “I’m voting Scottish Labour because…”, instead of some actor who lives in New York or wherever, or a 80s pop star who lives in London.
Brian Cox may carry some weight in the Dundee and surrounding area (it was front page news in the Courier) – but surely the SNP dont need to shore up their vote in the north east?
#35 by Dubbieside on April 9, 2011 - 10:09 pm
Malc
So why do you think the celebrities, particularly former Labour supporters or die hard Unionists are endorsing the SNP?
Would any party say “look this is a very slow news day we better hold back on these endorsements” lest our opponents think this is giving us an unfair advantage?
Its more a case of very good news management, certainly not a good day to bury good news.
Doug
I do not think there will be many SNP supporters getting ahead of themselves, there is still a long way to go. Momentum however is something we should endorse and try to build further on.
#36 by Malc on April 9, 2011 - 10:24 pm
No – you’re twisting what I’m saying. I agree it is good media management – and the reason they are focused more on the “celebrity” element is simply because the manifesto hasn’t been published yet. I wasn’t ascribing value to it – I was simply stating the fact! And that I thought John was perhaps a little trigger-happy on the chat that the SNP are “policy-light” given they haven’t yet released the manifesto.
#37 by John Ruddy on April 10, 2011 - 12:05 am
I’m not being trigger happy – its been a criticism of the SNP campaign for some time now. All you have heard from the nationalist camp is “Are you seriously thinking of Iain Gray for First Minister???” If that isnt a personality-led campaign that is light on policy (which considering they have been in Government is a bit rich).
The fact that when asked to produce the usual series of budgets for thenext few years, John Swinney just came forward with exactly the same as the existing one (he might as well just photocopied it!) suggests either a lack of ideas, or a lack of willingness to talk about them.
The SNP could have used on the ballit paper something like “SNP – A Vote for Independance” or “SNP – For a better Scotland” or any one of a number of good reasons for voting SNP – instead we get told the best reason for voting for them is to get Alex Salmond as First MInister.
#38 by Malc on April 10, 2011 - 9:09 am
Apologies – all I meant by “trigger-happy” was that the party haven’t published their manifesto yet, so will be policy light until then. Having said that – I do agree. The AS4FM on the ballot paper is a bit of a give away of the tactics!
#39 by An Duine Gruamach on April 10, 2011 - 10:02 am
I think you’re letting your party bias get in the way, John. The SNP have said far, far more about their record than they have about Iain Gray. You may be confusing the party with Newsnet.
#40 by John Ruddy on April 10, 2011 - 1:39 pm
Bit difficult since I dont visit Newsnet! If I want personal abuse, I can get it elsewhere thanks!
#41 by Dubbieside on April 9, 2011 - 10:31 pm
Malc
How am I twisting what you are saying?
I asked why you think these celebrities are now endorsing the SNP.
#42 by Malc on April 10, 2011 - 9:11 am
It was on the “Would any party say “look this is a very slow news day we better hold back on these endorsements†lest our opponents think this is giving us an unfair advantage?” that I felt I was being misrepresented! But I understand that those who have backed the SNP over Labour are doing so because they think the SNP offer something better for Scotland – I don’t think you can argue anything differently!