Today’s big Scottish news is that of a mysterious man offering us a parade of treats if we’ve been good boys or girls. No, not Santa Claus but rather the figure of Colonel Gaddafi. Thankfully, no-one took the man up on his selection pack offer in return for sitting on his lap, as the latest Wikileaks cables show.
There has been much anticipation over what these leaks would say regarding the Megrahi debacle, a debacle that has caused much heat and light since the Justice Secretary decided to release the man on compassionate grounds. However, today’s news is something of an anti-climax for those hoping for a dramatic twist in the tale.
The Scottish Government was offered goodies by the Libyan leader but these were clearly rebuffed and the situation was played with “a straight bat†by the SNP.
Perhaps the most interesting quote from the US is this:
“It is clear that the Scottish Government underestimated the blowback it would receive in response to Megrahi’s release and is now trying to paint itself as the victim. The Scottish Government severely underestimated both US government and UK public reaction to its decision… Alex Salmond has privately indicated that he was ‘shocked’.”
It would be a shame if there was to be confusion between being shocked at an overblown reaction and admission that the Government got it wrong. I was certainly surprised at a reaction that dragged on at a Scottish level, UK level and international level. That surprise was exacerbated once the situation moved past the point where most people had agreed that the decision was taken in good faith and that Kenny MacAskill was the right person to make that decision, whether one disagreed with the decision itself or not.
I’ve not read that much about the latest revelations but first impressions are that Scotland comes out of this latest Wikileaks instalment looking robust in its dealings and, as much as one would like to keep discussing the Megrahi chapter in Scotland’s history, is there really much else left to say? Particularly if even Wikileaks can’t fashion a meaningful talking point around this story other than Gaddafi’s unwelcome offers that most people had suspected all along?
#1 by Exiled Nat on December 8, 2010 - 6:59 pm
From my reading it seems, privately at least, all the key players didn’t want him to die in custody.
When Kenny took his, morally right, but politically questionable decision to release him, it seems (especially) labour and the other oppos have decided to sail the wave of public rage.
It’s sad to see mr. Charisma, sorry, gray, popping his veins out on his neck over an issue he clearly agreed with privately. At least we know where we stand with salmond.
#2 by cynicalHighlander on December 8, 2010 - 7:28 pm
Labour Agreed to help US Lobby Scottish Government over Megrahi
It would be nice to see the print media do some proper journalism in the UK.
ps. Anna is back online.
#3 by Observer on December 8, 2010 - 8:19 pm
SNP ACCUSED OF TELLING THE TRUTH
should of course be the headlines today……
#4 by Tony on December 8, 2010 - 9:12 pm
Is there no depths to this biased…………..nakedly biased reporting?
Watching the 6.30 news tonight was bizarro time. Opinions were reported as facts (Jack Straws) and the facts (British duplicity, US attempts to pressurise Scots Justice, SNP tells truth) were ignored.
I had to go online to get anything resembling the full story.
I’m not a complainer but have done so to the BBC asking for someone to account for the direction taken.
#5 by Doug Daniel on December 8, 2010 - 9:24 pm
The cables exonerate the SNP from even the tiniest smidgeon of suggestion that they acted in faith at all times. They also tell us that Labour were desperate for him to be released, and were prepared to do so on grounds of dubious morality.
The BBC’s take?
“Ooooh, Alex Salmond says HE had the last word on the release, NOT Kenny MacAskill!!!! This is the BIG news!!!!”
Pathetic, pathetic, pathetic. The BBC Scotland propaganda machine is plumbing previously unheard of depths. It’s clear that their first thought in any story is “so what did the Scottish Government do wrong? What can we use to bash them this time?” I just couldn’t believe my ears when I heard the words coming out of Jackie Bird’s mouth – I didn’t think even the BBC would be able to spin this against the SNP.
Could Scottish Labour perhaps get their own media wing, rather than using the BBC Scotland “news” department?
#6 by Douglas Daniel on December 9, 2010 - 10:16 am
Err, obviously that should be “that they DIDN’T act in good faith at all times”…
#7 by indy on December 8, 2010 - 9:28 pm
I think everyone is so thoroughly bored with the story that even if Wikileaks had published cables saying that Kenny MacAskill released Megrahi in return for a lifelong supply of Lucozade and a date with Elizabeth Hurley no-one would really care. Well, I suppose Iain Gray would feel obliged to go with it at FMQs but everyone else would be nodding off.
#8 by BenSix on December 9, 2010 - 3:04 am
Why, yes! The SCCRC certainly thought so.
#9 by Jeff on December 9, 2010 - 1:21 pm
Yep, sounds like Scotland’s media still has to up its game. Obviously I’m largely insulated from it down here and don’t get the joy of 6:30pm Scottish news etc.
Newsnetscotland obviously provides a good deal of welcome balance (and thanks for the link CH as I was hoping there would be a story on this on their website). I just hope NewsnetScotland gets the readership that it deserves…