William Hague’s painful personal statement has failed to quell the media fascination with his private life, which is unfortunate but only to be expected. Sally Bercow and others are right to say that he was given duff PR advice, true, but that hardly justifies yet more prurience and three-way interviews between journalists.
It’s been rumbling on for days, after all, and there is no actual story here. The rumours about Hague started years ago, and all inhabitants or political bubbles love a chance to get old rumours off their chest, but there’s nothing that could be described as actual substance to them.
In fact, it’s almost Westminster’s favourite game, given the sheer number of politicians who’ve been the subject of sexuality rumours. For the egregious Paul “Guido Fawkes” Staines, and many others, even the Guardian – see the last line here – this latest effort again reeks of nudge-nudge wink-wink homophobia. They’re too well-dressed, see? It’s politics by way of Are You Being Served? No doubt the Tory machine will respond the way they know best, and the traditional Fawkes-hunting will be in full cry (Jeff insisted on that, by the way).
The specific allegations being made are also profoundly stupid. Imagine, hypothetically, you’re a senior cabinet member, you’re married but in the closet, and you’re having an affair with a special adviser. Let’s also assume you’re of above average intelligence, which the Foreign Secretary clearly is, baseball caps notwithstanding.
Do you get a room together? Really? Surely you’d get a nice double to yourself and have your lover come by to “discuss tomorrow’s campaign events”. You don’t need to be Sherlock Holmes to see the allegation doesn’t stand up. No-one in their right mind plans a happy love life around twin beds. That’s a room booking you only make when it doesn’t even occur to you that people would think anything of it.
Apart from utterly misplaced prejudice, it’s not clear why Staines and others have gone for the Eurosceptic Hague, but he’s certainly an interesting figure. Like John Swinney, he bounced back from an unsuccessful stint as leader and rebuilt his reputation on the front benches. Both men are now effectively the number two figure in their respective governments – apologies to Nicola and Nick. In fact, Hague may be the only coalition Minister who had been gaining in credibility in office.
Once the flurry of nonsense has passed, that trend will continue, and the empathy for his situation will be what remains of this story. Morus is right. If you like a flutter, it’s time to back Hague for next Tory leader, which might encourage comparisons with Salmond rather than Swinney. Just think how furious Redwood and Tebbit would be.
#1 by Jeff on September 3, 2010 - 5:35 pm
I’m not entirely sure I agree with all your points James.Â
I haven’t followed much of the commentary on this (and I at least agree there has been far too much written about such a minor story) but the main point that I believe Guido was making was – why should Hague hire a 3rd spad when the individual appears remarkably underqualified, Â they are clearly very chummy and the PM has specified that Ministers should have only two advisers?
A valid question in these belt-tightening times and relationships, homosexuality and sex didn’t come into the crux of the matter, as far as I understood it at least.
Of course, separate to that, there has been innuendo and ‘nudge nudge wink wink’ over the twin room. That is abhorrent and juvenile but also, I hope at least, ancillary to the central charge.
As you say, not that sharing a room with a mate/colleague of the same sex even needs justifcation, it is not a smart way to cover up an affair. Something Hague would know if he had even turned his mind to the idea for a second, which he clearly hasn’t.Â
  Â
#2 by James on September 3, 2010 - 5:47 pm
Jeff, the question about the number of Spads is certainly a valid one to ask, but I’m not sure that’s what Guido’s really interested in. I didn’t want to link to him in the body, not that he’ll exactly miss the traffic..
#3 by Alec on September 3, 2010 - 7:34 pm
James, although I agree with you that the main point that Paul Staines was making was to get Order-Order onto C4 News, Jeff has a point. Staines was drawing attention to the rise from mediocrity to aide to PPC without oversight by… making a sniggering joke about rent boys.
This crassness in his delivery maybe not was a surprise, given Staines’ use of lawfare (some libertarian!) to suppress discussion of his historical association with RENAMO-affiliates; and his apparent lack of contrition following his drink driving conviction; not to mention previous political attacks with hints of anti-gay sentiments.
Oh, well, C4 just has shown Neil Hamilton describe himself as having been “a barrister, Tory MP and now a teacher”. Can anyone spot what’s missing?
Now, I am off to drink some Bushmills over the sight of his Newsnight interview.
PS Maybe you’re trying to present a wide vista of Norn Irish politics, but is it really necessary to start with a blog which
“create an opportunity for people to share their views on Sinn Féin in a positive and constructive manner”? This is unrelated to my taste for Bushmills.
PPS How about a Preview radio-button?
#4 by James on September 4, 2010 - 12:03 am
Yup, I’ll talk to the chaps about Sinn Fein. Although I do think they’re now playing a largely respectable role, implausible as that seems to those of us with long memories..
But honestly, would Able Seaman Staines have got worked up about some other quickly-promoted Spad if there wasn’t a bit of Shock! Horror! Gayness! with it? Does he even have a list of the other Spads? Has he checked their employment credentials? I doubt it, and if not, I’m not buying anything other than homophobia as his rationale, personally.
#5 by BrnoBhoy on September 3, 2010 - 5:37 pm
Surely all Willie ‘Ague had to do to scotch this one was refer to the 14 pints of ale he would knock back in a day while on’t delivery round when ‘e were a lad:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/871543.stm
Nowt gay about that now is there?
#6 by Alec on September 4, 2010 - 9:48 am
Nah, I think that is mostly twattish.
Genuine comment overheard: “I can’t be gay, I play rubgy!”.
Yeah, and that African-American spiritual that youse all sing in the bath has nowt to do with your willies.
#7 by Jeff on September 4, 2010 - 12:27 am
Fair play James, I can’t very well defend much, if anything, in that post from Guido. Not that I really have any desire to anyway.
And hey, you got the Fawkes Hunting pun in (albeit under protest!) so I’m all good…
Pingback: “Will that be a twin room or a double, sir? – Scottish Roundup
#8 by Bella Caledonia on September 5, 2010 - 10:13 am
Hi – on the Sinn Fein issue you say ‘I’ll talk to the chaps about Sinn Fein. Although I do think they’re now playing a largely respectable role’ – that would be as elected leaders of Northern Ireland wouldnt it who have decommissioned arms and been in coalition government?
#9 by James on September 5, 2010 - 10:23 am
Exactly, that’s the crowd. But then the DUP haven’t owned guns, and they’re in coalition with Sinn Fein, and would I want a link in the blogroll promoting them? Not sure.